Comparison of the efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic and open surgery for the correction of retrocaval ureter
Authors Mao L, Xu K, Ding M, Pan J, Guo Z
Received 7 April 2017
Accepted for publication 10 May 2017
Published 6 June 2017 Volume 2017:13 Pages 697—701
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Deyun Wang
Lijun Mao,1,2 Kai Xu,1 Meng Ding,1 Jun Pan,1 Zhicheng Guo1
1Department of Urinary Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, 2Clinical College, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People’s Republic of China
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of retroperitoneal laparoscopic and open surgery for the correction of retrocaval ureter.
Patients and methods: Clinical data of 14 patients with retrocaval ureter were analyzed retrospectively. Among them, nine were treated by open surgical therapy and five by retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery. The ureter was transpositioned to a normal anatomic position followed by laparoscopic intracorporeal uretero and ureteric anastomosis.
Results: Open surgery was successfully performed in nine cases. The mean surgery time was 95.6±22.0 min, and blood loss was 108.6±34.5 mL. The mean hospitalization time was 14.8±1.1 days, and the recovery time was 52.8±1.3 days. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery was successfully performed in five cases without conversion to open surgery and without severe perioperative complications. The mean surgery time was 112.0±42.1 min, and blood loss was 45.3±15.1 mL. The mean hospitalization time was 7.3±1.9 days, and the recovery time was 23.6±2.4 days. Postoperative urine leakage occurred in one patient. No postoperative ureter stenosis occurred in patients who were treated by retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery.
Conclusion: Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureteroplasty in patients with retrocaval ureter is safe and effective with less trauma and faster recovery and could be used as first choice for the treatment of retrocaval ureter.
Keywords: retrocaval ureter, laparoscopy, open surgery
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]