Comparison of corneal biomechanics after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction compared to LASIK: an ex vivo study
Authors Kanellopoulos AJ
Received 8 October 2017
Accepted for publication 14 November 2017
Published 25 January 2018 Volume 2018:12 Pages 237—245
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Anastasios John Kanellopoulos1,2
1Department of Ophthalmology, Laservision Clinical and Research Institute, Athens, Greece; 2Department of Ophthalmology, New York University Medical School, New York, NY, USA
Purpose: To investigate ex vivo potentially different corneal biomechanical properties after small-incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus LASIK for myopic correction.
Methods: Thirty human donor corneas were subjected to either myopic SMILE or femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK. Donor corneas were assigned to six investigative groups: Group A, –3.00 D (diopters) SMILE; Group B, –8.00 D SMILE; Group C, –3.00 D LASIK; and Group D, –8.00 D LASIK. Additionally, two control groups were formed: Group E, SMILE and Group F, LASIK. All groups consisted of five corneas, randomly allocated. The corneas in the control groups were subjected to the corresponding femtosecond-laser lamellar cuts but not to tissue removal. Evaluation of biomechanical tensile strength was conducted by biaxial force application. Primary outcome measures were stress at 10% and 15% strain, and Young’s modulus at 10% and 15% strain.
Results: In SMILE, the average relative difference (Δ) of the four outcome measures was –34.46% for –3.00 D correction versus control Group E and –49.34% for –8.00 D correction versus control Group E. In LASIK, average Δ was –24.88% for –3.00 D correction versus control, and –52.73% for –8.00 D correction versus control. All these differences were statistically significant; SMILE compared to LASIK for the same myopic correction appears to result in more biomechanical reduction for –3.00 D corrections by –26%, while a nonstatistically significant difference was noted in –8.00 D corrections.
Conclusion: Both SMILE and LASIK procedures do substantially alter corneal biomechanical properties, and the degree of tensile strength reduction is statistically significantly correlated to the extent of myopic correction. Additionally, SMILE procedure seems to result in more tensile strength reduction in lower myopic corrections compared to LASIK, and similar tensile strength reduction to LASIK in higher myopic corrections when compared to LASIK.
Keywords: SMILE, femto-second LASIK, myopic LASIK, corneal biomechanics, Young’s modulus, corneal stress–strain, shear strength, tensile strength
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]
Other article by this author:
Topography-modified refraction (TMR): adjustment of treated cylinder amount and axis to the topography versus standard clinical refraction in myopic topography-guided LASIK
Published Date: 3 November 2016