Clinical Presentations and Comparative Outcomes of Delayed-Onset Low-Grade Endophthalmitis Managed with or Without Intraocular Lens Explantation
Authors Dave VP, Parmeshwarappa DC, Dogra A, Pappuru RR, Pathengay A, Joseph J, Das T
Received 23 December 2019
Accepted for publication 13 February 2020
Published 26 February 2020 Volume 2020:14 Pages 551—555
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Vivek Pravin Dave,1 Deepika C Parmeshwarappa,1 Avantika Dogra,1 Rajeev Reddy Pappuru,1 Avinash Pathengay,2 Joveeta Joseph,3 Taraprasad Das1
1Smt. Kanuri Santhamma Center for Vitreoretinal Diseases, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India; 2Retina and Uveitis Service, GMR Varalakshmi Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Visakhapatnam, India; 3Jhaveri Microbiology Center, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India
Correspondence: Vivek Pravin Dave
Smt. Kanuri Santhamma Center for Vitreoretinal Diseases, Kallam Anji Reddy Campus, LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India
Purpose: To compare the outcomes of delayed-onset low-grade endophthalmitis managed with and without intraocular lens (IOL) explantation.
Setting: Tertiary eye-care research institute in southern India.
Design: Retrospective comparative case series.
Methods: The study included all cases of post-cataract surgery delayed-onset endophthalmitis from January 1990 to January 2019. Time to endophthalmitis, duration of symptoms, presenting visual acuity, time to IOL explantation when performed, resolution after explantation, number of intravitreal injections, and final visual acuity were compared in the IOL non-explanted and IOL explanted groups.
Results: There were 115 eyes – 61 eyes in the IOL non-explant and 54 eyes in the IOL explant group. Between the two groups there was no statistically significant difference in age (58.37 ± 14.05 and 56.04 ± 14.96 years, respectively; p=0.35), vision at presentation (> 20/400 in 29.5% and 29.6% eyes, respectively; p=0.98), and the duration of follow-up (14.38 ± 16.05, median 8.5 months and 7.06 ± 3.55, median 6 months respectively; p=0.43). There was a statistically significant difference between the IOL non-explant and IOL-explant groups in the time to resolution of inflammation (92.70 ± 36.28 and 45.33± 11.2 days, respectively; p < 0.0001) and the number of intravitreal injections (4.57 ± 0.75, median 5 and 2.79± 2.11, median 2 respectively, p=0.005). Persistent/recurrent inflammation at 6 months was recorded in 18.03% and 5.55% in the IOL non-explant and IOL explant eyes, respectively (p=0.04). Favorable functional outcome was seen in 50.81% vs 68.51% in IOL non-explant and explant eyes, respectively (p=0.05).
Conclusion: IOL explantation in delayed-onset endophthalmitis helps in earlier resolution of inflammation, need for lesser number of intravitreal injections and a trend towards better functional outcomes.
Keywords: intraocular lens explantation, endophthalmitis, IOL, delayed-onset endophthalmitis, low-grade endophthalmitis
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]