Back to Journals » Research and Reports in Urology » Volume 11

Chronological Changes In Uroflowmetry After Hypospadias Repair: An Observational Study

Authors Al Adl AM, Omar RG, Mohey A, El Mogy AAEN, El Karamany TM

Received 17 August 2019

Accepted for publication 26 September 2019

Published 21 October 2019 Volume 2019:11 Pages 269—276

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S227601

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Justinn Cochran

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jan Colli


Ahmed Mahmoud Al Adl, Rabea Gomaa Omar, Ahmed Mohey, Ahmed Abd El Naeem El Mogy, Tarek Mohammed El Karamany

Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Benha, Egypt

Correspondence: Ahmed Mahmoud Al Adl
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University, Qalubeya, Benha 13512, Egypt
Tel +201009932625
Email ahmed.aladl@fmed.bu.edu.eg

Aim: Urinary flow after urethroplasty is of paramount importance. The aim of this study is to evaluate the progression of uroflowmetry (UF) parameters after different distal and proximal hypospadias repair techniques.
Methods: In this cohort study, cases that underwent primary hypospadias repair at our institution between March 2010 and December 2018 were included when uncomplicated, asymptomatic and toilet-trained. UF findings and post void residual were described after each specific technique.
Results: In all, 88 patients were eligible. Time to last UF ranged from 35 to 138 months postoperatively. Significant increase started 36 months after distal tubularized incised plate urethroplasty (TIP) and afterwards than Mathieu technique. While was noticed 24 and 36 months after Onlay technique and proximal TIP, respectively; however, TIP showed steady significant increase atall time intervals. Duckett repair exhibited insignificant change in maximum flow rate (Qmax) values, buccal mucosal graft (BMG) and inner preputial graft (IPG), significant increase in the Qmax values after 6 and 24 months, respectively, then remained steady high. Transposed preputial flap (TPF) showed significant increase at 6–12 months only, then remained steady lower than the other two techniques. Obstructed flow was 37% after distal TIP, 30% after Mathieu, 25% after proximal TIP, 66.7% after Duckett repair, and 33.3% after TPF. There were no obstructed cases after BMG and IPG.
Discussion: Improvement by time varied between techniques. After repair most cases are below the 50th percentile, implying that the reconstructed urethra is not functioning as a normal urethra. Staged repair for proximal hypospadias is preferable to a heroic one-stage procedure.
Conclusion: Choice of the surgical technique for hypospadias repair had impact on the improvement of Qmax values. TIP improved 36 months postoperatively. However, for proximal cases staged graft repair had earlier improvement and higher Qmax values than proximal TIP and Onlay techniques.

Keywords: hypospadias, evaluation, uroflowmetry, voiding pattern, follow up

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]