Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction
Authors Hosny M, Aboalazayem F, El Shiwy H, Salem M
Received 17 January 2017
Accepted for publication 16 March 2017
Published 14 July 2017 Volume 2017:11 Pages 1309—1314
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Amy Norman
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Mohamed Hosny, Fayrouz Aboalazayem, Hoda El Shiwy, Mohsen Salem
Department of Ophthalmology, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and ocular response analyzer (ORA).
Methods: This is a prospective clinical study that was conducted on 30 eyes in the interval between February 2016 and September 2016. The age of the patients ranged between 19 and 40 years. The patients underwent SMILE surgery using the femto laser. IOP was measured preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively by both techniques, the GAT and the ORA.
Results: GAT recorded lower values than ORA values (IOPcc) preoperatively and postoperatively and the difference was statistically significant. Both GAT and ORA IOP measurements decreased after SMILE. There was no statistically significant correlation between the changes in the GAT and ORA readings and the postoperative corneal pachymetry or the lenticule thickness. Both corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor showed significant decline after the procedure, which correlated with the lenticule thickness.
Conclusion: SMILE causes significant reduction in IOP measurement by ORA and GAT. Corneal biomechanics decreases following SMILE and this correlates with lenticule thickness.
Keywords: ocular response analyzer, small incision lenticule extraction, corneal hysteresis
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]
Other articles by this author:
Simultaneous intratunnel cross-linking with intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation versus simultaneous epithelium-off cross-linking with intrastromal corneal ring segment implantation for keratoconus management
Hosny M, Nour M, Azzam S, Salem M, El-Mayah E
Published Date: 17 January 2018
Femtosecond laser-assisted implantation of complete versus incomplete rings for keratoconus treatment
Hosny M, El–Mayah E, Sidky MK, Anis M
Published Date: 20 January 2015
Changes in retinal nerve fiber layer thickness following mechanical microkeratome-assisted versus femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK
Hosny M, Zaki RM, Ahmed RA, Khalil N, Mostafa HM
Published Date: 25 September 2013
Published Date: 10 June 2011
Hosny M, Hassaballa MAM, Shalaby A
Published Date: 9 June 2011