Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
Support Open Access and Dove Press
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Measuring severe adverse events and medication selection using a “PEER Report” for nonpsychotic patients: a retrospective chart review
(4794) Total Article Views
Authors: Hoffman DA, DeBattista C, Valuck RJ, Iosifescu DV
Published Date June 2012
Volume 2012:8 Pages 277 - 284
|Received:||10 March 2012|
|Accepted:||04 April 2012|
|Published:||21 June 2012|
1Neuro-Therapy Clinic, Inc, Denver, CO, USA; 2Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA; 3University of Colorado, SKAGES School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Aurora, CO, USA; 4Mood and Anxiety Disorders Program, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
Abstract: We previously reported on an objective new tool that uses quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) normative- and referenced-electroencephalography sampling databases (currently called Psychiatric EEG Evaluation Registry [PEER]), which may assist physicians in determining medication selection for optimal efficacy to overcome trial-and-error prescribing. The PEER test compares drug-free QEEG features for individual patients to a database of patients with similar EEG patterns and known outcomes after pharmacological interventions. Based on specific EEG data elements and historical outcomes, the PEER Report may also serve as a marker of future severe adverse events (eg, agitation, hostility, aggressiveness, suicidality, homicidality, mania, hypomania) with specific medications. We used a retrospective chart review to investigate the clinical utility of such a registry in a naturalistic environment.
Results: This chart review demonstrated significant improvement on the global assessment scales Clinical Global Impression – Improvement and Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction – Short Form as well as time to maximum medical improvement and decreased suicidality occurrences. The review also showed that 54.5% of previous medications causing a severe adverse event would have been raised as a caution had the PEER Report been available at the time the drug was prescribed. Finally, due to the significant amount of off-label prescribing of psychotropic medications, additional, objective, evidence-based data aided the prescriber toward better choices.
Conclusion: The PEER Report may be useful, particularly in treatment-resistant patients, in helping to guide medication selection. Based on the preliminary data obtained from this chart review, additional studies are warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of adding PEER data when making medication decisions.
Keywords: PEER, referenced-EEG, QEEG, adverse events, medication selection, off label
Cannotea Citeulike Del.icio.us Facebook LinkedIn Twitter
Other articles by Dr Daniel Hoffman
Readers of this article also read:
"I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University.
- MLA'14 -
May 16–21, 2014
- CINP World Congress
22 - 26 June, 2014
- 27th ECNP Congress
18 - 21 October, 2014
- Neuroscience 2014 Annual Meeting
November 15 - 19
- Aggressive behavior, cognitive impairment, and depressive symptoms in elderly subjects
- Critical appraisal of the role of davunetide in the treatment of progressive supranuclear palsy
- Role of nucleus accumbens glutamatergic plasticity in drug addiction
- Long-term treatment of bipolar disorder with a radioelectric asymmetric conveyor