skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8123

Donepezil in Alzheimer’s disease: an evidence-based review of its impact on clinical and economic outcomes

Review

(3011) Views  (875) Full article downloads

Author: Joanne Knowles

Published Date March 2006 Volume 2006:1-Issues 3 & 4(3) Pages 0 - 0
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CE.S7447

Joanne Knowles

Core Medical Publishing, Knutsford, UK

Introduction: Donepezil is indicated for the symptomatic treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. It is a specific and reversible inhibitor of acetylcholinesterase (AChE); by increasing levels of available acetylcholine, donepezil may compensate for the loss of functioning cholinergic brain cells.

Aims: This review evaluates the clinical impact of donepezil by assessing randomized controlled and open-label naturalistic trials, as well as observational studies. A broad perspective is gained of its effectiveness on various outcomes.

Evidence review: There is strong evidence that donepezil has efficacy against the three major domains of Alzheimer’s disease symptoms, namely functional ability, behavior, and cognition. The strongest evidence is for improvement or less deterioration in global outcomes and cognition in the short to medium term. There is limited evidence that improved global outcomes are maintained in the long term and clear evidence to support long-term maintenance of cognitive benefits. Also, donepezil appears to maintain function in the long term and there is some level 1 and 2 evidence of improved or limited deterioration in behavior or mood in the short to medium term. Despite donepezil’s effects on major symptoms of Alzheimer’s disease, its impact on patients’ quality of life has not been consistently demonstrated, perhaps reflecting the difficulty of assessing this aspect in this patient population. Donepezil may also lessen caregiver burden. Donepezil has some effect on markers of brain function, but more data are needed to confirm a neuroprotective effect. There is limited and conflicting evidence that long-term donepezil treatment delays time to institutionalization. There is some evidence that donepezil may be cost effective, especially when unpaid caregiver costs are considered. Donepezil is generally safe and well tolerated.

Clinical value: AChE inhibitors are the only agents recommended for the treatment of cognitive decline in patients with mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease. Donepezil is more effective than placebo and is well tolerated in improving the major symptoms of this disease. Improvements are usually modest, although stabilization of cognitive and functional symptoms with donepezil can also be considered an important clinical outcome. Donepezil may lessen caregiver burden. Donepezil may also be cost effective, especially when unpaid caregiver costs are considered. More data are required from randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up to confirm its cost effectiveness and impact on quality of life, disease progression, and time to institutionalization.

Key words: acetylcholinesterase (AChE) inhibitor, Alzheimer’s disease, dementia, donepezil, evidence, outcomes






 

Other articles by Dr Core Journal

Aliskiren in hypertension: evidence for its potential therapeutic value
Aprepitant: the evidence for its place in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting
Aripiprazole: the evidence of its therapeutic impact in schizophrenia
Bevacizumab: the evidence for its clinical potential in the treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer
Bortezomib: the evidence of its clinical impact in multiple myeloma
Ciclesonide in persistent asthma: the evidence of its therapeutic value
Dasatinib: the emerging evidence of its potential in the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia
Dutasteride: an evidence-based review of its clinical impact in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
Eltrombopag: the emerging evidence of its therapeutic value in thrombocytopenia
Eplerenone: the evidence for its place in the treatment of heart failure after myocardial infarction
Etanercept in psoriasis: the evidence of its therapeutic impact
Exubera® (inhaled insulin): an evidence-based review of its effectiveness in the management of diabetes
Fosphenytoin for the treatment of status epilepticus: an evidence-based assessment of its clinical and economic outcomes
FTY720 in multiple sclerosis: the emerging evidence of its therapeutic value
K-111: the emerging evidence for its potential in the treatment of the metabolic syndrome
Lapatinib: the evidence for its therapeutic value in metastatic breast cancer
Lumiracoxib: the evidence of its clinical impact on the treatment of osteoarthritis
Maraviroc: the evidence for its potential in the management of HIV
Perindopril: the evidence of its therapeutic impact in hypertension
Pramipexole in restless legs syndrome: an evidence-based review of its effectiveness on clinical outcomes
Rimonabant: the evidence for its use in the treatment of obesity and the metabolic syndrome
Sevelamer as a phosphate binder in adult hemodialysis patients: an evidence-based review of its therapeutic value
Tigecycline: an evidence-based review of its antibacterial activity and effectiveness in complicated skin and soft tissue and intraabdominal infections
Topiramate: the evidence for its therapeutic value in the prevention of migraine
Vildagliptin: the evidence for its place in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • Testimonials

    "... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University