Back to Browse Journals » Clinical Interventions in Aging » Volume 2 » Issue 3

Predictors of adherence to physical activity in the Lifestyle Interventions and Independence for Elders pilot study (LIFE-P)

Authors W Jack Rejeski, Michael E Miller, Abby C King, Stephanie A Studenski, Jeffrey A Katula, et al For the LIFE Investigators (2006)

Published Date October 2007 Volume 2007:2(3) Pages 485—494

DOI http://dx.doi.org/

Published 8 October 2007

W Jack Rejeski1, Michael E Miller2, Abby C King3, Stephanie A Studenski4, Jeffrey A Katula1, Roger A Fielding5, Nancy W Glynn4, Michael P Walkup2, Jamile A Ashmore6, For the LIFE Investigators (2006)

1Department of Health and Exercise Science, Wake Forest University; 2Department of Biostatistics, Wake Forest University; 3Stanford University; 4University of Pittsburgh; 5Tuffs University; 6Cooper Institute

Objectives: A prospective design was used to examine predictors of adherence to a physical activity intervention in older adults with compromised function.

Methods: The sample included 213 men (31.1%) and women (68.9%) with an average age of 76.53 years.

Results: The predictor variables accounted for 10% of the variance in percent attendance during adoption and transition, respectively. Adding percent attendance during adoption to the prediction of percent attendance during transition increased the explained variance in this phase to 21%. During maintenance, the predictors accounted for 13% of the variance in frequency of physical activity; this estimate increased to 46% when adding in percent attendance from the transition phase.

Discussion: These results are encouraging in that the physical activity intervention appears to have been well tolerated by diverse subgroups of older adults. The role of prior behavior in predicting downstream adherence underscores the importance of developing proactive interventions for treating nonadherence in older adult populations.

Keywords: Disability, Physical Activity, Older Adults, Adherence

Download Article [PDF] 

Readers of this article also read:

Glistenings in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses do affect visual function

Beiko GHH, Grzybowski A

Clinical Ophthalmology 2013, 7:2271-2274

Published Date: 27 November 2013

A quasi-experimental study on a new service option for short-term residential care of older stroke patients

Chau PH, Yeung F, Chan TW, Woo J

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2013, 8:1167-1175

Published Date: 6 September 2013

Robotic assessment of the influence of age on upper-limb sensorimotor function

LLinares A, Badesa FJ, Morales R, Garcia-Aracil N, Sabater JM, Fernandez E

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2013, 8:879-888

Published Date: 10 July 2013

Corrigendum

Brief G, Lammich T, Nagel E, Pfennigsdorf S, Spraul CW, Ho S

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:1271-1272

Published Date: 6 August 2012

Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cellulose nanofibers

de Lima R, Feitosa LO, Maruyama CR, Barga MA, Yamawaki PC, Vieira IJ, Teixeira EM, Corrêa AC, Mattoso LH, Fraceto LF

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:3555-3565

Published Date: 11 July 2012

The etiological features of anterior uveitis in a Turkish population

Guney E, Sezgin Akcay BI, Erdogan G, Unlu C, Akcali G, Bayramlar H

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:845-849

Published Date: 1 June 2012

Hydrophobic ion pairing of an insulin-sodium deoxycholate complex for oral delivery of insulin

Sun S, Liang N, Kawashima Y, Xia D, Cui F

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:3049-3056

Published Date: 28 November 2011