Access to Medicines and Pharmaceutical Policy in Saudi Arabia: A Scoping Review

Introduction

Access is an essential term in health policy research that must be defined and applied efficiently. According to researchers, “access” refers to a patient’s capacity or desire to enter or utilize the healthcare system some describe as the variables affecting entrance. In both health policy and health service research, the concept of access is crucial.¹ In order to achieve the highest health standards possible, it is crucial that each individual has access to medicines and has the financial, physical, and social means to do so. According to one definition of pharmaceutical policy, it is a subset of health policy that “deals with the principles guiding decision making in the field of pharmaceuticals”² in order to advance the general health and wellbeing of every society within a healthcare system.

There are many different aspects of pharmaceutical policy, including licensing, pricing, formulary management, prescribing, pharmacy services, rational drug consumption, pharmaceutical economics, access, and affordability of medications. Maximizing access to medications, ensuring the quality of pharmaceutical products, managing the cost of medical care and medications, and encouraging responsible drug use are the overarching goals of pharmaceutical policy.³ However, the price of some medications can be prohibitive for people who need to obtain them. Access to medications is restricted, which has significant effects on patients’ morbidity and mortality.⁴ For this reason, policy decision-makers frequently discuss this issue.

Saudi Arabia has a population of 35.84 million (about twice the population of New York) as of March 2022.⁵ By 2050, it is expected to be 77.2 million population.⁶

Saudi Arabia is ranked 26th out of 191 nations by the World Health Organization for total healthcare performance and is seen as an example for other countries. By 2050, Saudi Arabia’s male and female life expectancies are anticipated to rise from 73.1 to 78.4 years of age and 76.1 to 81.3 years of age in both genders.⁶

The Saudi Arabian healthcare system has significantly developed during the past 70 years.⁶ The Ministry of Health offers primary, secondary, and tertiary health services. In order to refer patients who need more complex care to Government hospitals (the secondary level of care), primary healthcare facilities offer both preventive and curative primary care services. Patients who require higher levels of treatment, in contrast, are moved to central or specialty hospitals (the tertiary level of healthcare).⁷

Modernization has led to the establishment of a vast network of medical institutions, including thousands of polyclinics and hundreds of hospitals. Diabetes is the primary reason for mortality in Saudi Arabia (36%), followed by road traffic accidents (32.3%), ischemic heart disease (25.4%), and chronic renal disease (25.1%).⁸ Saudi Arabia has a three-tiered healthcare system. All citizens and government employees are entitled to free medical and pharmaceutical care. The entire cost of healthcare in 2018 was estimated to be 37.7 billion US dollars (141.375 billion Saudi Riyal).⁸

Saudi Arabia is undergoing a massive economic transformation (2030 economic vision), posing unique challenges to the labor market and healthcare system.⁹ Large demand swings affecting the international market and supplier concerns are all causes that contribute to global drug shortages.⁹ For example, Saudi Arabia’s causes of the shortage of drugs are low commercial margins, poor pharmaceutical supply administration, and weak and inefficient law-violation sanctions against pharmaceutical businesses.¹⁰

Shortages of drugs are a big issue having a detrimental impact on patients’ health and necessitates immediate action by healthcare authorities.¹¹ Local pharmaceutical companies produce only about 16% of domestic medications in Saudi Arabia. However, Saudi Arabia purchases roughly 59.4% of all pharmaceuticals in the Gulf region.¹²

Saudi Arabia’s healthcare system has seen significant development in recent years. This change was significantly influenced by the government-private partnerships that received increasing focus in the Saudi 2030 Vision plan. Putting the Vision 2030 plan into action, which focuses on primary preventative healthcare and increases the private sector’s participation in delivering these health services, was established by introducing an initiative that incorporated private community pharmacies in medication provision.¹³

A system for electronic prescribing named “Wasfaty” was introduced in 2018 in government healthcare facilities at the primary and secondary levels. According to the definition of e-prescribing “the direct computer-to-computer transmission of electronic prescriptions (e-prescriptions) from the prescriber office to community pharmacies”.¹³

The wasfaty portal is used by doctors to initiate e-prescriptions, which are then electronically forwarded to neighborhood pharmacies so that patients can get their free drugs and other healthcare items. The free of cost prescriptions are for Saudi Arabian Citizens and eligible expatriates. These are primarily for those medicines which are not available at hospital pharmacies. To provide simple access to the neighborhood pharmacy, the program establishes connections between primary healthcare facilities and hospitals and a few chosen community pharmacies in different places.¹³ The services also seek to increase patient medication counseling, decrease drug waste, increase medication availability, and improve health spending efficiency.¹³

A pharmaceutical policy provides and uses pharmaceuticals in a healthcare system.¹⁴ The current study examines pharmaceutical policy and access to medicines issues in Saudi Arabia. Even though local pharmaceutical manufacturing has surged in the past ten years, according to some estimates, domestic manufacturers barely cover 20 to 25% of the prescribed medicine use, despite over thirty-two registered and twenty-seven operational pharmaceutical industries.

As a result, corporate and government funding in critical areas of the medicines manufacturing market, including vaccines, biologics, and chemotherapeutics drugs, need to be increased to meet the country’s need for essential prescription medications.¹⁵

The purchasing expenditure will increase the drug’s rising price and limited availability.¹⁶ A Precision Business Insights poll revealed that, the pharmaceutical business was 5.75 billion US Dollars in 2017 and is predicted to increase to 6.7%, reaching 8.46 billion US Dollars by 2023.¹⁶

The Kingdom’s rising population and self-awareness regarding health and pharmaceutical products are some of the contributing factors leading to increased expenditure on healthcare.¹⁷ European, American, and Indian corporations have already constructed manufacturing facilities, particularly in the King Abdullah Economic Industrial Area manufacturing a wide range of pharmaceuticals such as Antimicrobials, Antidiabetic drugs, Anticoagulants, and Cardiovascular drugs. In addition, there are opportunities for other manufacturers to produce Biological, Vaccines, and Parenteral medications.¹⁷

The generics sector is increasing quickly as a result of the Saudi government’s measures in the recent past to lower pharmaceutical costs and increase local manufacturing.¹⁷ Access to medicines suffers budgetary limitations and the increasing cost of innovative medicines. This scoping review discusses medicine access, shortages, generic medication, availability, pharmacoeconomics, and pricing regulations. The study’s outcomes could help the country develop good pharmaceutical and access policies.

Objectives of the Study

To conduct a scoping review documenting access to medicines and pharmaceutical policy in Saudi Arabia.

Method

Study Design and Eligibility Criteria

To find published literature, a scoping review utilizing PRISMA-ScR guidelines¹⁸ was carried out. The term “access” refers to a broad notion encompassing acceptability, availability, accessibility, affordability, price, and reimbursement and was used to select and include research in this scoping review.¹⁹ This review contains any related research that looks at access (perceived or actual) or any components that make up the idea of access. Only the original studies conducted in Saudi Arabia and English Language are included. The studies included were published from June 2010 to July 2022. Letters, opinions, systematic reviews, and editorials that are not original; also, the non-peer-reviewed journal research did not aim to investigate access to medicines and pharmaceutical policy in Saudi Arabia were excluded.

Patient and Public Involvement

None.

Information Sources Searched

The Author conducted a literature search of published publications from 2010 to 2022 in four health-related databases: Google Scholar, EBSCO, Science Direct, and The Library University of Huddersfield database. Until July 2022, 286 articles were retrieved.

Search Strategy

The development and use of a search strategy. These keywords were used in a search that was limited to the English language: The keywords used were “Saudi Arabia”, “Medicines Policy”, “High-cost medicines”, “Pharmaceuticals”, “Drug shortage”, “Drugs”, “Regulation”, “Policy”, and the “Medicines”, “Access”, “Availability”.

Study Selection

We checked and eliminated duplicate articles. Two reviewers checked the research’ titles and abstracts for eligibility and applicability. Three groups—included, excluded, and uncertain—were created from the articles. When unsure whether an article should be included, the complete text was retrieved and independently examined by the two authors/reviewers to determine the eligibility status of the article. If the disagreement persists, a third expert was enlisted to offer advice. The eligibility of all included articles was evaluated by full-text screening after the irrelevant articles had been eliminated. The following criteria were used to eliminate publications: non-original articles such as comments, letters, case reports, surveys, editorials, review articles, unpublished articles, or articles that were published in a language other than English or in a country other than Saudi Arabia.

Data Charting Process

Title, authors, research or study design (including any methodology), study location (hospital, community pharmacy, general pharmacy, educational institution, or public context), associated countries, and technique, if any The information that was gathered and tabulated from each study includes information on the access to medicines, the pharmaceutical policy domain it covers, the date of publication, the publishing journal, and the study objectives.

By assessing the research’ goals or aims, linked papers with similar goals were gathered into one category, and after the categories were analyzed, the themes were created.

Synthesis of Results

The information was evaluated thematically in accordance with the area of “Access to medicines and pharmaceutical policy.” The results of the synthesized analysis were presented as frequencies and percentages.

Results

Study Selection

For all of these keywords, Google Scholar found a total of 21,473 articles, EBSCO 2909 articles, Science Direct 1700 articles, and the Huddersfield Library 1696 articles. All databases yielded a total of 27,778 articles. The research on access to medicines and pharmaceutical policies challenges in Saudi Arabia was searched. The titles and abstracts were evaluated to screen the papers for suitability.

Out of 27,778 titles/abstracts found through database and journal searches, we found 19 articles in English after deleting duplicates and material unrelated to Saudi Arabia’s pharmaceutical policy and access to medicines. All publications were examined thoroughly against the study’s eligibility criteria. The process how these studies were selected is explained in the Prisma Flow Diagram as shown in Figure 1. Three studies were excluded based on their publication year, and four studies were excluded because they were not original research publications. The principal author evaluated the remaining studies for relevance to Saudi Arabia’s medications and pharmaceutical policy access. Finally, only 19 studies total were selected for the analysis. All 19 studies are presented in Table 1. The non-peer-reviewed journal research did not aim to investigate access to medicines, and pharmaceutical policy in Saudi Arabia was excluded. The review only included original research articles.

Figure 1 PRISMA Flow Chart. Notes: PRISMA figure adapted from Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin et al PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473. Copyright © 2018 American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved. Reprinted with the permission of American College of Physicians, Inc.18

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

Included Studies Characteristics

All 19 original research articles were assessed in selection, objectives, results, and conclusion. Two researchers independently extracted data using the extraction table All Data was compared, and any differences were discussed. Access to medicines and pharmaceutical policy difficulties in Saudi Arabia, drug shortages, availability, pricing policies, outcomes measured, and a summary of the findings are among the conditions associated with the retrieved data. The information retrieved from the 19 articles yielded essential themes. Among these topics were: Generic Medicines, Access to medicines, pharmacoeconomics, and Cancer drug financing.

The number of Included articles were published in 2010,¹ 2013,¹ 2014,¹ 2015,¹ 2016,³ 2017,¹ 2018,¹ 2019,¹ 2020,⁶ and in the year 2021.³ Figure 2 shows the distribution of the selected articles over the years.

Figure 2 Articles Distribution through the years.

Figure 3 shows that Nineteen articles were included in this study. The chosen articles revealed four themes. Among these topics were: Access to medicines and Pharmacoeconomics were the predominant theme, 36.84%⁷ pharmacoeconomics 36.84%,⁷ followed by Generic Medicines at 15.80%,³ and Cancer drug financing 10.54%.²

Figure 3 Articles Classified in each Themes.

Four Themes Were Revealed by the Thematic Analysis

1. Theme 1: Generic Medicines.
2. Theme 2: Access to Medicines.
3. Theme 3: Pharmacoeconomics
4. Theme 4: Cancer drugs financing.

Theme 1. Generic Medicines

A cross-sectional study was carried out in Makkah region of Saudi Arabia, between the months of February and March 2016. To evaluate the knowledge, attitude, perspective, and current practices of Saudi Arabian community pharmacists on the substitution of generic medications. The poor utilization of generic medications in Saudi Arabia may be partially explained by the apparent knowledge gaps among community pharmacists regarding generic medications and their substitute. To reduce the price of medications and total healthcare spending, healthcare officials must increase public awareness of the safety and effectiveness of generic medications and encourage their usage.²⁰

According to a study done in Taif, Saudi Arabia, the general people may not be aware of generic medications or generic substitute [20]. Furthermore, branded medications were favored over generic ones by more than half of the study’s participants [20]. Similar to this, a different study that assessed doctors’ perceptions of and attitudes toward generic drugs in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, suggested that prescribers’ lack of knowledge of generic drugs was one of the main reasons for the low rate of generic drug prescribing [20]. Community pharmacists voiced worries regarding the caliber of generic medications in a prior qualitative study carried out in Al Ahsa City (Eastern province).²⁰

One of the most essential elements influencing a pharmacist’s choice to administer generic versus brand drugs is the patient’s physical appearance. Pharmacists working at hospital pharmacies are impacted by medical advice and seek high-quality pharmaceuticals.²¹

Theme 2. Access to Medicines

In one of the studies, it was stated that Drug shortages are an area of the complicated healthcare problem, including foreign and local issues. Creating new laws requiring pharmaceutical manufacturers, dealers, and suppliers to intimate the (Saudi Food and Drug Administration) of impending medicines shortages, upgrading the medication distribution chain, updating the policies on delivery systems, developing, and implementing the penalty regulations against law-violating corporations, expanding pharmaceutical manufacturing investment, and altering present policy of pricing the pharmaceuticals.²²

To explore the occurrence, features, and solutions for reducing the effects of drug shortages on patient care and safety in large hospitals. In Saudi Arabia, a cross-sectional study using questionnaires was carried out. More than 70% of participants cited educating prescribers, suggesting substitute medications, and informing hospital personnel about the existence of drug shortages using modern communication methods as the two most effective strategies for reducing the impact of drug shortages on patient care. Health policymakers should be prompted to address this significant public health issue by the high reported rates of medicine shortages in some hospitals.²³

One of the studies, in Saudi Arabia stated that pharmacies in remote locations are less likely to have specific prescriptions accessible across the board. Although most pharmaceuticals were provided in both cities and suburban regions, with availability varying between 50% to 100%, the availability of the same medicine in both areas was less than 12%.²⁴

Important domestic factors highlighted for drug shortages include lack of government legislation requiring early notice of drug shortages, inefficient pharmaceutical distribution system, low-profit margins on certain vital pharmaceuticals, government contracting strategy that is out of step with pharmaceutical industry developments, overdependence on the pharmaceutical business, ineffectual legal punishment imposed on pharmaceutical firms, and various authorized pharmaceutical importers and dealers.²⁴ A study carried out in Saudi Arabia sought to determine whether there is a scarcity of several frequently prescribed psychiatric drugs in Saudi Arabian community pharmacies, and if so, to evaluate the potential causes of the shortage of these drugs. Most psychotropics were unavailable in almost 50% of the 248 private pharmacies assessed. The study’s findings should hasten the Saudi Food and Drug Administration’s (SFDA) structural transformation process, which should lead to the publication and enforcement of a required list of drugs for community pharmacies that includes the most frequently prescribed psychotropic medications.²⁵

The total drug shortage in US hospitals (15.1%) was higher than in Saudi hospitals (10.3%).²⁶

In another study, it was found that most community pharmacists are informed of and have confirmed appropriate procedures addressing prescription shortages. However, their individual experiences and perspectives on the issue varied depending on the pharmacy’s practice since there is no defined mechanism for notifying medicine shortages.²⁷

In one of the studies in Saudi Arabia, Three hundred fifteen medicines were requested due to drug shortage, which indicated that excess pharmaceuticals were available for re-issue. Overstored medicines reports were re-issued in over 98% of cases, covering 75% of medicine shortage requests.²⁷

In Saudi Arabia, a different study found that due to the absence of any clearly defined methodology to report any drug shortage. Most pharmacists in the community pharmacy know the proper techniques for dealing with medication shortages. However, their experience and perspectives on the issue vary depending on each pharmacy’s policies.²⁸

Theme 3. Pharmacoeconomics

In order to determine the level of cost consciousness and knowledge with cost ideas among Saudi Arabian doctors, a cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study with a study period from May to October 2019 was conducted. It includes Physicians who were employed in Saudi Arabia in a variety of settings and workplaces.

The physicians concurred that while prescribing medicines, expenses should be taken into account. However, physicians are not excessively certain of their understanding of healthcare expenses. The most frequent obstacles to taking cost into account in a physician’s therapeutic decision-making in their everyday practice were thought to be things like medical ethics, patient demand, and satisfaction. The concept of cost-effectiveness increased cost consciousness.²⁹

The KSA is undergoing a significant shift in healthcare delivery to achieve its nationwide “Project 2030”.³⁰ The Kingdom is establishing autonomous, scientific-proof healthcare technology evaluation (HTA) organizations to maximize health gains via optimal resource use. Exercises to build capacity are crucial to ensuring that key stakeholders have a better understanding of healthcare procedures and to facilitating open dialogue that leads to agreement. On December 18 and 19, 2019, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia hosted a two-day workshop to build capacity for a diverse group of local specialists. The study investigated the opinions of a multi-stakeholder group of regional Saudi experts on the value components that may be significant for health technology assessment (HTA) procedures and methodologies pertaining to pharmaceutical products in Saudi Arabia (referred to as “value drivers”). The goal of this study was to find out what pharmaceutical businesses visualize developing a comprehensive HTA organization in KSA and the companies’ expectations. The conference’s outcomes were divided into three categories: HTA methodology, goal and mission, application, and social concerns. HTA’s contribution to the Saudi healthcare system was primarily praised, and industry participants desired to adjust to the country’s future needs.³⁰

In addition to taking disease factors into account for HTA processes, participants valued a pharmaceutical product’s efficacy and safety. Participants also valued a binding HTA recommendation and the utilization of local real-world data to back up HTA contributions when this was possible.

The two factors that most strongly influenced acceptability and feasibility were effectiveness and safety. The least acceptable and feasible were explicit cost-effectiveness thresholds. Participants identified data accuracy and availability as two major barriers to HTA implementation in Saudi Arabia. Stakeholders prioritized the effectiveness and safety of pharmaceutical products and illness characteristics in HTA procedures. They also valued a legally binding healthcare technology assessment suggestion and, where possible, the inclusion of domestic proof to back up HTA recommendations.³¹

The P&T committee members of 11 different hospitals in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, were issued structured survey questions as part of another study that was carried out in 2007.

The study demonstrated the potential influence of pharmacoeconomics on Pharmacy and Therapeutic panel formulary determinations. To facilitate the use of such a tool, more training should be provided to medical practitioners and hospital management. To make the most use of limited healthcare resources, hospitals need to recruit healthcare personnel with pharmacoeconomic expertise.³²

The study’s findings stated that the fast emergence of biosimilar medicines has resulted from the loss of product patents and several original biologics. The anticipated economic benefit of launching such a drug accompanies uncertainties regarding its biotechnology, authorizations, position in therapeutic regimens and the possibility of side consequences.³³

A coordinated medication management strategy for HIV patients helps control the use of specialist drugs to achieve the most remarkable health outcomes while saving costs and boosting patient satisfaction. So, medical coverage can play a significant part in developing specialized medicines such as HCV drugs.³⁴

The study’s findings indicated much scope for development in the areas of medication policy guidelines in Saudi Arabia’s medical insurance businesses. Furthermore, the Research concentrated on improving pharmaceutical services, such as unnecessary prescription of drugs and illogical use of medication.³⁵

Theme 4. Cancer Drugs Financing

In a study conducted in Saudi Arabia, it was found that for the treatment of Breast Cancer, FEC (fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) was the most often utilized regimen.³⁶ Which aligns with the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. According to the findings, compliance with a medical standard and recommended pharmaceutical treatments resulted in better cancer care. The findings show how studying drug usage patterns may help institutions manage inventories and use healthcare resources more efficiently.³⁶ Saudi Oncology Health Economics Expert Group (SHARP) suggested four important categories that affect healthcare outcomes: legal, supply, therapeutic, and consumer areas.³⁷

Discussion

On a national scale, the availability of necessary and inexpensive medicines is a critical component of any healthcare system. Saudi Arabia provides free health care to its citizens, yet, the present literature indicates a substantial medicine shortage.

Pharmacoeconomics

Almost 36.84% of the included articles were classified as pharmacoeconomic studies. According to one of the studies, pharmaceutical expenses are the area of healthcare spending that is growing the fastest in the majority of the countries, thus physicians must conduct drug prescribing with cost considerations in mind. Pharmaceuticals can only be sold if the Saudi government approves the pricing via the (Saudi Food and Drug Administration),³⁸ which is a dynamic process since the government is fully engaged in providing extensive medical care to the citizens.³⁸ Cost varies caused of unforeseen circumstances that affect other parts of the world; however, as an incentive, the government can ensure price stability for items whose manufacturing plants have been shifted to Saudi Arabia. Because of the population’s higher earning power and the government-funded free health services system, pharmaceutical pricing variations appear to have little or no impact in Saudi Arabia.³⁸

Generic Medicines

Almost 15.78% of the included articles were classified as Generic medicines studies. Healthcare facilities (private and government) look to adopt generic drugs, resulting in a larger market for them. However, because of their capacity to get branded items, the Saudi public will be hesitant to embrace this transformation. To reduce the price of medications and total healthcare spending, healthcare officials must increase public awareness of the safety and effectiveness of generic medications and encourage their usage. To encourage private industry participation in medicine manufacturing and marketing, the government provides a range of incentives.³⁸ It was investigated in a study by Hassali et al³⁹ how generic medications were used in the health systems of eight different countries, including Australia. According to the survey, generic medications are between 20% and 90% less expensive than their originator counterparts. Patients typically turn to neighborhood pharmacists as their first port of call for convenient access and quick relief from their ailments.⁴⁰ Nine European nations have indicated that the accessibility of medications is impacted by reclassification in community pharmacies since there was an uptick in pharmacy establishment following deregulation.⁴¹ However, this study also pointed out that this frequently occurred in cities. Therefore, authorities in Australia and New Zealand should also take into account fair access, as suggested by Vogler et al, even though reclassification may improve access.⁴¹ If well-balanced, pharmaceutical policies can influence price levels and the accessibility of branded and generic medications. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia focuses entirely on cost-cutting supply-side strategies rather than demand-side initiatives.⁴¹

Cancer Drugs Financing

Almost 2% of the included articles were classified as Cancer Drugs Funding studies. According to a study by Zia et al⁴² the Qataris do not have to pay for healthcare; it is provided at no cost to them. However, the government always foots 80% of the expense for expatriates. Even for people with chronic illnesses like cancer, diabetes, and heart disease, they only pay 20% of the cost.

These nations should prioritize government procurement and price rules to achieve the industrialization and healthcare systems’ productivity and accessibility goals. To enhance generic acceptance, countries should develop, apply, and execute guidelines for utilizing generic medication.⁴³ Given the region’s inherent distrust of generics, procurement regulations concentrating on costs and compensation could be incapable of achieving performance and cost goals. Such change should be accompanied by identifying the market policies on generic medicines and alternatives and regulatory capacity strengthening if necessary.⁴³

Access to Medicines

Almost 36.84% of the included articles were classified as Access to medicines studies. In compared to the United States, Australia, and New Zealand, it has been discovered that the United Kingdom funds a greater number of medications, the most recent medications, and innovative medications. In contrast to other European nations, the UK takes longer to reimburse for new medications, and access to different types of medications varies across the country.⁴⁴ Even if there is a need to increase investment, prioritizing is also necessary to guarantee timely access to new medications for patients in the United Kingdom.⁴⁴

When Japan was contrasted with European nations, notably the United Kingdom. In Japan, there is more insurance coverage and access to more medications.⁴⁵

Local pharmaceutical manufacture is essential for ensuring that national healthcare systems remain resilient, particularly when it comes to improving access to necessary medications and reducing reliance on imports and global supply chains. Pharmaceuticals are a research-intensive industry, and one of the biggest obstacles to diversifying the portfolio of locally produced pharmaceuticals is the systemic lack of governance and support for R&D activities in this sector, among a host of related problems like unsupportive regulatory regimes and human resources capacity limitations.⁴⁶

The task of conducting a scoping review familiarizes with existing scenarios in Saudi Arabia regarding drug access and availability. However, there is a lot to be done for dispensing generic medicines to reduce the existing cost of pharmaceuticals. To enhance generic acceptance, Saudi Arabia should develop, adopt, and execute generic pharmaceutical ordering and supply rules. Saudi Arabia’s government has done a lot to decrease drug shortages. The health authorities should provide proper warehouses and suppliers to reduce the delays of drugs that are still inadequate and unsatisfactory compared to the developed world. According to the scoping review, more studies are needed to establish the effect of these challenges on the country’s healthcare facilities, patients, physicians, and economy.

Conclusion

All the studies were conducted in Saudi Arabia. The prominent themes were Generic medicine, Drug Availability and Shortages, Pharmacoeconomics, and Cancer drugs financing. Finally, the available evidence revealed that Saudi Arabia’s healthcare system has numerous issues ranging from cancer drug financing, medicines shortages, and access issues to pharmaceuticals. Stakeholders and governments should pay close attention to these issues and support any attempts to alleviate their impact. Furthermore, more teaching programs and resources are needed to raise patient and physician awareness of unethical non-prescribed drug administration, drug abuse, or misuse. To avoid medicine delays, health authorities should supply adequate warehouses and suppliers. More Research is needed to see how these difficulties affect the healthcare system, patients, providers, and the economy.