-
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Why are some evidence-based care recommendations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease better implemented than others? Perspectives of medical practitioners
Original Research
(1082) Views (310) Full article downloads
Authors: Johnston KN, Young M, Grimmer-Somers KA, Antic R, Frith PA
Published Date December 2011
Volume 2011:6 Pages 659 - 667
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S26581
Kylie N Johnston1, Mary Young2, Karen A Grimmer-Somers1, Ral Antic3, Peter A Frith41International Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; 2Transitional and Community Services, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; 3Department of Thoracic Medicine, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; 4Respiratory, Allergy and Sleep Services, Repatriation General Hospital and Flinders University Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
Background: Clinical guidelines for management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) include recommendations based on high levels of evidence, but gaps exist in their implementation. The aim of this study was to examine the perspectives of medical practitioners regarding implementation of six high-evidence recommendations for the management of people with COPD.
Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with medical practitioners involved with care of COPD patients in hospital and general practice. Interviews sought medical practitioners' experience regarding implementation of smoking cessation, influenza vaccination, pulmonary rehabilitation, guideline-based medications, long-term oxygen therapy for hypoxemia and plan and advice for future exacerbations. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and analyzed using content analysis.
Results: Nine hospital-based medical practitioners and seven general practitioners participated. Four major categories were identified which impacted on implementation of the target recommendations in the care of patients with COPD: (1) role clarity of the medical practitioner; (2) persuasive communication with the patient; (3) complexity of behavioral change required; (4) awareness and support available at multiple levels. For some recommendations, strength in all four categories provided significant enablers supporting implementation. However, with regard to pulmonary rehabilitation and plans and advice for future exacerbations, all identified categories that presented barriers to implementation.
Conclusion: This study of medical practitioner perspectives has indicated areas where significant barriers to the implementation of key evidence-based recommendations in COPD management persist. Developing strategies to target the identified categories provides an opportunity to achieve greater implementation of those high-evidence recommendations in the care of people with COPD.
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, guideline implementation, barriers, enablers, medical practitioners, qualitative research
Other articles by Dr Kylie Johnston
Readers of this article also read:
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity
Optimizing management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in the upcoming decade
Safety of indacaterol in the treatment of patients with COPD
Outcome of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD patients with severely impaired health status
Lung function decline in COPD
Adherence to current guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) among patients treated with combination of long-acting bronchodilators or inhaled corticosteroids
Clinical and economic outcomes in an observational study of COPD maintenance therapies: multivariable regression versus propensity score matching
Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a descriptive study in the mid-western region of Nepal
Primary care physician perceptions on the diagnosis and management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in diverse regions of the world
- Journal Indexing
See where all the Dove Press journals are indexed
- Testimonials
"You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Clinical effectiveness of the Respimat® inhaler device in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evidence when compared with other handheld inhaler devices
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity
- The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis
- Exacerbation rate, health status and mortality in COPD – a review of potential interventions




