-
Patient Preference and Adherence
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Unannounced telephone interviews: A useful and positively received tool in the reinforcement of lifestyle intervention
Original Research
(1911) Views (586) Full article downloads
Authors: Hilde Kristin Brekke, Åsa Sunesson, Ragnhild A Lenner
Published Date December 2009
Volume 2009:3 Pages 357 - 362
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S6812
Hilde Kristin Brekke, Åsa Sunesson, Ragnhild A Lenner
Department of Clinical Nutrition, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Objectives: Reinforcement is critical in dietary counseling, but is also time demanding. We evaluated the acceptability of frequent telephone interviews, including a 24-hour dietary recall, as a means of reinforcement after lifestyle intervention in healthy subjects at risk of diabetes. The aim of this report is to assess the following questions: Was the chosen frequency and duration of telephone reinforcement appropriate? What were the positive and negative aspects of receiving telephone interviews?
Methods: Seventy-seven nondiabetic relatives of patients with type 2 diabetes were included in a randomized controlled intervention study in which they received dietary education. Unannounced telephone calls were placed to follow adherence and for encouragement and support. After two years of intervention, the perceived appropriateness of the different aspects of receiving telephone interviews were evaluated by postal questionnaire.
Results: Telephone reinforcement was positively received by the participants. Relatively frequent telephone calls, as many as three times per month, were not considered disturbing or time consuming. Participants became aware of their own dietary habits through the interviews, which they appreciated. They found duration of follow-up between one and five years appropriate.
Conclusions: Telephone interviews can be applied in lifestyle intervention programs in healthy at-risk individuals in which time constraints may otherwise prevent active persons from participating.
Keywords: telephone interviews, reinforcement, lifestyle, intervention, acceptability
- 8th Annual Patient Adherence, Communications & Engagement Summit
31 May - 1 June 2011, Hotel Concorde, Berlin
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- Health literacy and health seeking behavior among older men in a middle-income nation
- Increasing access to quality health care for the poor: Community perceptions on quality care in Uganda
- Prolonged rupture of membranes in term infants: should all babies be screened?
- Narcissistic rage: The Achilles’ heel of the patient with chronic physical illness




