-
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Substitution of anticonvulsant drugs
Review
(2904) Views (903) Full article downloads
Authors: Bernhard J Steinhoff, Uwe Runge, Otto W Witte, Hermann Stefan, et al.
Published Date June 2009
Volume 2009:5 Pages 449 - 457
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S5366
Bernhard J Steinhoff1, Uwe Runge2, Otto W Witte3, Hermann Stefan4, Andreas Hufnagel5, Thomas Mayer6, Günter Krämer7
1Epilepsy Center, Kehl-Kork, Germany; 2Department of Neurology, University of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany; 3Department of Neurology, University of Jena, Jena, Germany; 4Epilepsy Center, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany; 5Neurocenter, Düsseldorf, Germany; 6Epilepsy Center, Radeberg, Germany; 7Swiss Epilepsy Center, Zurich, Switzerland
Abstract: Changing from branded drugs to generic alternatives, or between different generic formulations, is common practice aiming at reducing health care costs. It has been suggested that antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should be exempt from substitution because of the potential negative consequences of adverse events and breakthrough seizures. Controlled data are lacking on the risk of substitution. However, retrospective data from large medical claims databases suggest that switching might be associated with increased use of AED and non-AED medications, and health care resources (including hospitalization). In addition, some anecdotal evidence from patients and health care providers’ surveys suggest a potentially negative impact of substitution. Well-controlled data are needed to assess the real risk associated with substitution, allowing health care professionals involved in the care of patients with epilepsy to make informed decisions. This paper reviews currently available literature, based on which the authors suggest that the decision to substitute should be made on an individual basis by the physician and an informed patient. Unendorsed or undisclosed substitution at the pharmacy level should be discouraged.
Keywords: anticonvulsant drugs, epilepsy, generic drugs
Readers of this article also read:
Risk stratification for arrhythmic death in an emergency department cohort: a new method of nonlinear PD2i analysis of the ECG
Management of glucocorticoids-induced osteoporosis: role of teriparatide
The use of sibutramine in the management of obesity and related disorders: An update
Coenzyme Q10 effects in neurodegenerative disease
Cough and asthma diagnosis: physicians’ diagnosis and treatment of patients complaining of acute, subacute and chronic cough in rural areas of Japan
The dual kinase complex FAK-Src as a promising therapeutic target in cancer
Development and implementation of treadmill exercise testing protocols in COPD
Low intracellular ATP levels exacerbate carcinogen-induced inflammatory stress response and inhibit in vitro tubulogenesis in human brain endothelial cells
Phenotype characterization of embryoid body structures generated by a crystal comet effect tail in an intercellular cancer collision scenario
- Have an opinion about one of our articles?
We encourage you to write a Letter to the Editor
- American Acne and Rosacea Society
The American Acne and Rosacea Society (AARS), is a 501(c)(6) non-profit organization dedicated to elevating the understanding and treatment of acne and rosacea.
- The benefits and risks of testosterone replacement therapy: a review
- Tenofovir-associated bone density loss
- Drug design with Cdc7 kinase: a potential novel cancer therapy target
- Development of mucosal adjuvants for intranasal vaccine for H5N1 influenza viruses




