-
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
PowerPoint or chalk and talk: Perceptions of medical students versus dental students in a medical college in India
Original Research
(3594) Views (1077) Full article downloads
Authors: Vikas Seth, Prerna Upadhyaya, Mushtaq Ahmad, et al.
Published Date August 2010
Volume 2010:1 Pages 11 - 16
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S12154
Vikas Seth, Prerna Upadhyaya, Mushtaq Ahmad, Vijay MogheDepartment of Pharmacology, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India
Purpose: To assess students’ perceptions of the impact of PowerPoint (PPT) presentations in lectures in comparison to the traditional chalk and talk method and lectures using transparencies and overhead projector (TOHP). The study analyzes the preferences for teaching aids of medical students versus dental students.
Methods: Second year medical and dental undergraduates were asked to fill in a nine-item questionnaire about their perceptions of the three lecture delivery methods. Following analysis of the questionnaire the students were interviewed further. The results were analyzed separately for medical and dental students to see if there was any difference in their perceptions.
Results: The majority of the medical students (65.33%) preferred PPT presentations, while 15.16% of students preferred the lectures using chalkboard, and 19.51% preferred TOHP for teaching (P < 0.001). Of the dental students: 41.84% preferred chalkboard, 31.21% preferred TOHP, and 25.85% students preferred PPT presentations in the lectures (P < 0.05). Some important comments of the students were also recorded on interview which could be valuable for the medical teachers.
Conclusion: The medical students clearly preferred the use of PPT presentations while the dental students did not. The study does not bring out evidence based superiority of any lecture delivery method. It appears that in the hands of a trained teacher any teaching aid would be appropriate and effective. This highlights the need for formal training in teaching technologies to develop good presentation skills and thus motivate the students.
Keywords: audiovisual aids, medical education, lecture delivery methods, PowerPoint presentations, OHP, chalkboard
Other articles by Dr Vikas Seth
Readers of this article also read:
Is gene activity in plant cells affected by UMTS-irradiation? A whole genome approach
Novel and emerging approaches to combat adolescent obesity
Development and implementation of an online hybrid model for teaching evidence-based practice to health professions: processes and outcomes from an Australian experience
Doctors or technicians: assessing quality of medical education
Station-based deconstructed training model for teaching procedural skills to medical students: a quasi-experimental study
Interface between problem-based learning and a learner-centered paradigm
Predicting performance at medical school: can we identify at-risk students?
Introduction to Evidence-Based Medicine: a student-selected component at the Faculty of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University
Curriculum design of emergency medical services program at the College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences
-
Call For Submissions
Submit Original Research Article, Review, Case Report, or Rapid Communication in Advances in Medical Education and Practice
- Effects of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors on motor neuron survival
- Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease: a case study
- Unresolved abdominal mass in an adult cryptorchid testis: a case report
- Herpes zoster in the T1 dermatome presenting with Horner’s syndrome, radicular weakness, and postherpetic neuralgia




