-
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Pharmacoeconomics in COPD: lessons for the future
(2777) Views (509) Full article downloads
Authors: Helen J Starkie, Andrew H Briggs, Mike G Chambers
Published Date March 2008
Volume 2008:3(1) Pages 71 - 88
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S
Helen J Starkie1, Andrew H Briggs1, Mike G Chambers2
1Public Health and Health Policy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK; 2Global Health Outcomes, GlaxoSmithKline, Greenford, UK
Abstract: COPD exerts a substantial burden on health and health care systems globally and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Treatment however can be costly and health care providers are interested in both whether treatments can offer improvements in disease burden and whether they represent value for money. Economic evaluations seek to resolve this issue by producing results that can be used to inform and assist the decision maker in allocating scarce health care resources. In this paper we introduce economic evaluation and then use these themes to review and critically appraise the existing COPD economic evaluations, in order to assess quality in light of today’s standards. The use of existing economic evaluations in informing the decision maker is then discussed. Ten out of the fifteen studies were clinical trial or observational study based, and the remaining five on a decision analytic model. Study design, interventions, outcome measures and the use of uncertainty varied considerably; consequentially the results are difficult to compare in any consistent manner. Efforts for future studies to harmonize study design and methodology, particularly towards adopting a modeling framework, using current treatment as comparator and adopting a common effectiveness measure, such as the QALY, should be made in order to produce results that are comparable and useful to a decision maker.
Keywords: COPD, burden of disease, economic evaluation, cost effectiveness, pharmacoeconomic
Readers of this article also read:
Pulmonary stem cells and the induction of tissue regeneration in the treatment of emphysema
Influenza: the virus and prophylaxis with inactivated influenza vaccine in “at risk” groups, including COPD patients
Gender differences in the association between C-reactive protein, lung function impairment, and COPD
Optimizing economic outcomes in the management of COPD
Long-term oxygen therapy: Are we prescribing appropriately?
The influence of the media on COPD patients’ knowledge regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation
Determinants and predictors of the cost of COPD in primary care: A Spanish perspective
A review and empirical study of the composite scales of the Das–Naglieri cognitive assessment system
Application of hyperthermia induced by superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles in glioma treatment
- Journal Indexing
See where all the Dove Press journals are indexed
- Testimonials
"You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Clinical effectiveness of the Respimat® inhaler device in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evidence when compared with other handheld inhaler devices
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity
- The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis
- Exacerbation rate, health status and mortality in COPD – a review of potential interventions




