Back to Browse Journals » Open Access Surgery » Volume 5

Patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: experience at a tertiary care institution in Pakistan

Authors Fazal A, Lakdawala RH

Published Date February 2012 Volume 2012:5 Pages 9—14

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAS.S16348

Received 15 November 2010, Accepted 21 December 2011, Published 14 February 2012

Akil Fazal1, Riaz H Lakdawala2
1Clinical Fellow, NYU Hospital for Joint Disease, New York, US; 2Associate Professor and Chief, Section of Orthopedics, Department of Surgery, The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan

Objective: To determine the effect of patellar resurfacing in patients offered total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis.
Design: Randomized control study.
Place and duration of study: The Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan from January 3, 2005 to January 9, 2010.
Patients and methods: Patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were assigned to either the patellar resurfacing or nonresurfacing arm using systematic sampling. This consisted of patients undergoing unilateral and bilateral knee arthroplasty. Preoperatively, Knee Society Knee and Function Scores were calculated. After a minimum of 3 years postoperatively Knee Society Knee and Function Scores as well as the Clinical Anterior Knee Pain Rating were calculated and analysis done to check for differences.
Results: Seventy-five patients were recruited in each arm; 135 patients had bilateral and 15 had unilateral knee arthroplasty. The mean preoperative knee score was 40.4 for the resurfacing group and 40.60 for the nonresurfacing group (P = 0.45). This improved postoperatively to 93.67 and 94.23 respectively, with no difference between the two groups (P = 0.67). The mean preoperative function score was 45.50 for resurfaced patellae and 45.83 for nonresurfaced. This improved to 89.67 and 90.50, respectively, again with no difference (P = 0.51). Postoperative Clinical Anterior Knee Pain Rating was a mean of 0.1 for resurfaced and 0.13 for nonresurfaced patellas, with no difference on analysis (P = 0.06). However, patients who had bilateral knee arthroplasty had a slightly higher Clinical Anterior Knee Pain Rating than those who had single knee surgery (P = 0.046) irrespective of whether the patellar was resurfaced or not.
Conclusion: In patients undergoing primary Total Knee Arthroplasty for osteoarthritis, there is no added advantage of performing resurfacing of the patellar at 3 years of follow-up.

Keywords: patellar, patellar ligament, patellofemoral pain syndrome, arthroplasty subchondral, arthroplasy replacement knee, osteoarthritis knee, Pakistan

Download Article [PDF] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Other articles by this author:

Readers of this article also read:

Design and in vivo evaluation of oxycodone once-a-day controlled-release tablets

Kim JY, Lee SH, Park CW, Rhee YS, Kim DW, Park J, Lee M, Seo JW, Park ES

Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015, 9:695-706

Published Date: 30 January 2015

Progressive osseous heteroplasia: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis

Pignolo RJ, Ramaswamy G, Fong JT, Shore EM, Kaplan FS

The Application of Clinical Genetics 2015, 8:37-48

Published Date: 30 January 2015

Diabetes reversal via gene transfer: building on successes in animal models

Gerace D, Martiniello-Wilks R, Simpson AM

Research and Reports in Endocrine Disorders 2015, 5:15-29

Published Date: 29 January 2015

Corneal laceration caused by river crab

Vinuthinee N, Azreen-Redzal A, Juanarita J, Zunaina E

Clinical Ophthalmology 2015, 9:203-206

Published Date: 29 January 2015

Device-length changes and implant function following surgical implantation of the KineSpring in cadaver knees

McNicholas MJ, Gabriel SM, Clifford AG, Hasler EM

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 2015, 8:47-56

Published Date: 6 January 2015

Codelivery of doxorubicin and curcumin with lipid nanoparticles results in improved efficacy of chemotherapy in liver cancer

Zhao XJ, Chen Q, Liu W, Li YS, Tang HB, Liu XH, Yang XL

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015, 10:257-270

Published Date: 30 December 2014

Photothermal cancer therapy using graphitic carbon–coated magnetic particles prepared by one-pot synthesis

Lee HJ, Sanetuntikul J, Choi ES, Lee BR, Kim JH, Kim E, Shanmugam S

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015, 10:271-282

Published Date: 30 December 2014

Using registries to identify type 2 diabetes patients

Thomsen RW, Sørensen HT

Clinical Epidemiology 2015, 7:1-3

Published Date: 18 December 2014

Evaluation of in vitro glistening formation in hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses

Thomes BE, Callaghan TA

Clinical Ophthalmology 2013, 7:1529-1534

Published Date: 25 July 2013