Back to Browse Journals » ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research » Volume 5

Medical technology as a key driver of rising health expenditure: disentangling the relationship

Authors Sorenson C, Drummond M, Bhuiyan Khan B

Published Date May 2013 Volume 2013:5 Pages 223—234

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S39634

Received 27 October 2012, Accepted 8 January 2013, Published 30 May 2013

Corinna Sorenson,1,2 Michael Drummond,2,3 Beena Bhuiyan Khan1

1LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK; 2European Health Technology Institute for Socioeconomic Research, Brussels, Belgium; 3Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK

Abstract: Health care spending has risen steadily in most countries, becoming a concern for decision-makers worldwide. Commentators often point to new medical technology as the key driver for burgeoning expenditures. This paper critically appraises this conjecture, based on an analysis of the existing literature, with the aim of offering a more detailed and considered analysis of this relationship. Several databases were searched to identify relevant literature. Various categories of studies (eg, multivariate and cost-effectiveness analyses) were included to cover different perspectives, methodological approaches, and issues regarding the link between medical technology and costs. Selected articles were reviewed and relevant information was extracted into a standardized template and analyzed for key cross-cutting themes, ie, impact of technology on costs, factors influencing this relationship, and methodological challenges in measuring such linkages. A total of 86 studies were reviewed. The analysis suggests that the relationship between medical technology and spending is complex and often conflicting. Findings were frequently contingent on varying factors, such as the availability of other interventions, patient population, and the methodological approach employed. Moreover, the impact of technology on costs differed across technologies, in that some (eg, cancer drugs, invasive medical devices) had significant financial implications, while others were cost-neutral or cost-saving. In light of these issues, we argue that decision-makers and other commentators should extend their focus beyond costs solely to include consideration of whether medical technology results in better value in health care and broader socioeconomic benefits.

Keywords: medical technology, health expenditure, health policy, costs

Download Article [PDF] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Other article by this author:

Readers of this article also read:

Visual field loss in schizophrenia: evaluation of magnocellular pathway dysfunction in schizophrenic patients and their parents

Gracitelli CPB, Vaz de Lima FB, Bressan RA, Paranhos Jr A

Clinical Ophthalmology 2013, 7:1015-1021

Published Date: 29 May 2013

The occurrence of cerebrovascular atherosclerosis in Alzheimer’s disease patients

Yuan J, Wen G, Li Y, Liu C

Clinical Interventions in Aging 2013, 8:581-584

Published Date: 24 May 2013

Preparation and controlled-release studies of a protocatechuic acid-magnesium/aluminum-layered double hydroxide nanocomposite

Barahuie F, Hussein MZ, Hussein-Al-Ali SH, Arulselvan P, Fakurazi S, Zainal Z

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2013, 8:1975-1987

Published Date: 20 May 2013

The potential impact of various diagnostic strategies in cases of chronic pain syndromes associated with lumbar spine degeneration

Bokov A, Perlmutter O, Aleynik A, Rasteryaeva M, Mlyavykh S

Journal of Pain Research 2013, 6:289-296

Published Date: 17 April 2013

Follow-up analysis of federal process of care data reported from three acute care hospitals in rural Appalachia

Sills ES, Chiriac L, Vaughan D, Jones CA, Salem SA

ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research 2013, 5:119-124

Published Date: 27 March 2013