skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Measuring the impact of allied health research

Original Research

(1445) Views  (344) Full article downloads

Authors: Heath J, Grimmer-Somers K, Milanese S, Hillier S, King E, Johnston K, Wall K, Thorpe O, Young A, Kumar S

Published Date June 2011 Volume 2011:4 Pages 191 - 207
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S20265

Jan Heath, Karen Grimmer-Somers, Steve Milanese, Susan Hillier, Ellena King, Kylie Johnston, Kylie Wall, Olivia Thorpe, Alexandra Young, Saravana Kumar
School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia

Background: Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) rankings are given to academic journals in which Australian academics publish. This provides a metric on which Australian institutions and disciplines are ranked for international competitiveness. This paper explores the issues surrounding the ERA rankings of allied health journals in Australia.
Methods: We conducted a broad search to establish a representative list of general allied health and discipline-specific journals for common allied health disciplines. We identified the ERA rankings and impact factors for each journal and tested the congruence between these metrics within the disciplines.
Results: Few allied health journals have high ERA rankings (A*/A), and there is variability in the impact factors assigned to journals within the same ERA rank. There is a small group of allied health researchers worldwide, and this group is even smaller when divided by discipline. Current publication metrics may not adequately assess the impact of research, which is largely aimed at clinicians to improve clinical practice. Moreover, many journals are produced by underfunded professional associations, and readership is often constrained by small numbers of clinicians in specific allied health disciplines who are association members.
Conclusion: Allied health must have a stronger united voice in the next round of ERA rankings. The clinical impact of allied health journals also needs to be better understood and promoted as a research metric.

Keywords: allied health, research impact, publication metrics




 

Other articles by Dr Karen Grimmer- Somers



Readers of this article also read:

Gamma knife radiosurgery for uveal melanoma ineligible for brachytherapy by the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study criteria
Acceptability and effectiveness of chickpea sesame-based ready-to-use therapeutic food in malnourished HIV-positive adults
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Exacerbation rate, health status and mortality in COPD – a review of potential interventions
Enucleation following treatment with intravenous pentamidine for Acanthamoeba sclerokeratitis
Wearing facemasks when performing lumbar punctures: a snapshot of current practice amongst trainee doctors
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy
Critical appraisal of efficacy and safety of abatacept in the treatment of refractory rheumatoid arthritis
Current and future options for the management of phantom-limb pain
Comparison of pain models to detect opioid-induced hyperalgesia
  • Testimonials

    "You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio