skip to content
Dovepress - Open Access to Scientific and Medical Research
View our mobile site

8852

Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals

Other

(2950) Views  (1449) Full article downloads

Authors: Henrik H Rasmussen, Mette Holst, Jens Kondrup

Published Date September 2010 Volume 2010:2 Pages 209 - 216
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S11265

Henrik H Rasmussen1,2, Mette Holst3, Jens Kondrup4

1Centre for Nutrition and Bowel Disease, Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 3Centre for Nutrition and Bowel Disease, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 4Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Clinical Nutrition Unit, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract: About 20%–50% of patients in hospitals are undernourished. The number varies depending on the screening tool amended and clinical setting. A large number of these patients are undernourished when admitted to the hospital, and in most of these patients, undernutrition develops further during hospital stay. The nutrition course of the patient starts by nutritional screening and is linked to the prescription of a nutrition plan and monitoring. The purpose of nutritional screening is to predict the probability of a better or worse outcome due to nutritional factors and whether nutritional treatment is likely to influence this. Most screening tools address four basic questions: recent weight loss, recent food intake, current body mass index, and disease severity. Some screening tools, moreover, include other measurements for predicting the risk of malnutrition. The usefulness of screening methods recommended is based on the aspects of predictive validity, content validity, reliability, and practicability. Various tools are recommended depending on the setting, ie, in the community, in the hospital, and among elderly in institutions. The Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 seems to be the best validated screening tool, in terms of predictive validity ie, the clinical outcome improves when patients identified to be at risk are treated. For adult patients in hospital, thus, the NRS 2002 is recommended.

Keywords: nutritional risk screening, undernutrition, clinical outcome, hospital






Readers of this article also read:

The catastrophic collapse of morale among hospital physicians in Japan
Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors
Potential misinterpretations caused by collapsing upper categories of comorbidity indices: An illustration from a cohort of older breast cancer survivors
Refinement of rigid-body protein–protein docking using backbone and side-chain minimization with a coarse-grained model
Mortality following acute medical admission in Denmark: a feasibility study
The Nordic health registers – an important source when evaluating the safety of antidepressants during pregnancy
Sex ratio of newborn infants born to pregnant women with severe chronic constipation
Doxorubicin-loaded phosphatidylethanolamine-conjugated nanoliposomes: in vitro characterization and their accumulation in liver, kidneys, and lungs in rats
Synthesis, characterization, and biological evaluation of poly(L-γ-glutamyl-glutamine)-paclitaxel nanoconjugate
Existing data sources for clinical epidemiology: Aarhus University Prescription Database