Back to Browse Journals » Clinical Epidemiology » Volume 2

Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals

Authors Henrik H Rasmussen, Mette Holst, Jens Kondrup

Published Date September 2010 Volume 2010:2 Pages 209—216

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S11265

Published 2 September 2010

Henrik H Rasmussen1,2, Mette Holst3, Jens Kondrup4

1Centre for Nutrition and Bowel Disease, Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 3Centre for Nutrition and Bowel Disease, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 4Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Clinical Nutrition Unit, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract: About 20%–50% of patients in hospitals are undernourished. The number varies depending on the screening tool amended and clinical setting. A large number of these patients are undernourished when admitted to the hospital, and in most of these patients, undernutrition develops further during hospital stay. The nutrition course of the patient starts by nutritional screening and is linked to the prescription of a nutrition plan and monitoring. The purpose of nutritional screening is to predict the probability of a better or worse outcome due to nutritional factors and whether nutritional treatment is likely to influence this. Most screening tools address four basic questions: recent weight loss, recent food intake, current body mass index, and disease severity. Some screening tools, moreover, include other measurements for predicting the risk of malnutrition. The usefulness of screening methods recommended is based on the aspects of predictive validity, content validity, reliability, and practicability. Various tools are recommended depending on the setting, ie, in the community, in the hospital, and among elderly in institutions. The Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 seems to be the best validated screening tool, in terms of predictive validity ie, the clinical outcome improves when patients identified to be at risk are treated. For adult patients in hospital, thus, the NRS 2002 is recommended.

Keywords: nutritional risk screening, undernutrition, clinical outcome, hospital

Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Readers of this article also read:

Patient acceptability of the Tecnis® multifocal intraocular lens

Sood P, Woodward MA

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:403-410

Published Date: 24 March 2011

Career choices among medical students in Bangladesh

SM Moslehuddin Ahmed, Md Anwarul Azim Majumdar, Rezina Karim, et al

Advances in Medical Education and Practice 2011, 2:51-58

Published Date: 14 February 2011

Lyme disease: the next decade

Raphael B Stricker, Lorraine Johnson

Infection and Drug Resistance 2011, 4:1-9

Published Date: 7 January 2011

Autofluorescence imaging – a useful adjunct in imaging macular trauma

Mohammed S Mustafa, Vikki A McBain, Christopher M Scott

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:1497-1498

Published Date: 8 December 2010

Epigenomics in cancer management

Fabricio F Costa

Cancer Management and Research 2010, 2:255-265

Published Date: 27 October 2010

Neurotransmitter testing of the urine: a comprehensive analysis

Marty Hinz, Alvin Stein, George Trachte, et al

Research and Reports in Urology 2010, 2:177-183

Published Date: 7 October 2010

Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of cancer: a population-based cohort study

Lars Haukali Omland, Dora Körmendiné Farkas, Peter Jepsen, et al

Clinical Epidemiology 2010, 2:179-186

Published Date: 24 June 2010

Role of aliskiren in cardio-renal protection and use in hypertensives with multiple risk factors

Eduardo Pimenta, Suzanne Oparil

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2009, 5:453-463

Published Date: 19 May 2009

Applications of gold nanoparticles in cancer nanotechnology

Weibo Cai, Ting Gao, Hao Hong, Jiangtao Sun

Nanotechnology, Science and Applications 2008, 1:17-32

Published Date: 19 September 2008