Immunosupportive therapies in aging

(2175) Views  (426) Full article downloads

Authors: Tamas Fülöp, Anis Larbi, Katsuiku Hirokawa, Eugenio Mocchegiani, Bruno Lesourd, et al

Published Date May 2007 Volume 2007:2(1) Pages 33 - 54

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S

Tamas Fülöp¹, Anis Larbi², Katsuiku Hirokawa³, Eugenio Mocchegiani⁴, Bruno Lesourd⁵, Stephen Castle⁶, Anders Wikby⁷, Claudio Franceschi⁸, Graham Pawelec²

¹Research Center on Aging, Immunology Program, Geriatric Division, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada; ²Tübingen Ageing and Tumour Immunology Group, Center for Medical Research, University of Tübingen Medical School, Tübingen, Germany; ³Department of Pathology and Immunology Ageing and Developmental Sciences, Tokyo-Medical and Dental University Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan; ⁴Immunology Center, Section Nutrition, Immunity and Ageing, Research Department, Italian National Research Centres on Ageing, INRCA, Ancona, Italy; ⁵Hopital Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand, Service Soins de Suite, Route de Châteaugay BP56, F-63118 Cebazat, France; ⁶Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System and Multicampus Division of Geriatric and Gerontology, Department of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90073, USA; ⁷School of Health Sciences, Jönköping University, Department of Natural Science and Biomedicine, Jönköping, Sweden; ⁸Italian National Research Center on Aging, Department of Experimental pathology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Abstract: The primary role of the immune system is to protect the organism against pathogens, but age-associated alterations to immunity increase the susceptibility of the elderly to infectious disease. The exact nature of these changes is still controversial, but the use of screening procedures, such as the SENIEUR protocol to exclude underlying illness, helped to better characterize the changes actually related to physiological aging rather than pathology. It is generally agreed that the most marked changes occur in the cellular immune response reflecting profound alterations in T cells. Much of this is due to thymic involution as well as changes in the proportions of T cell subpopulations resulting from antigen exposure, and altered T cell activation pathways. However, a body of data indicates that innate immune responses, including the critical bridge between innate and adaptive immunity, and antigen presenting capacity are not completely resistant to senescence processes. The consequences of all these alterations are an increased incidence of infections, as well as possibly cancers, autoimmune disorders, and chronic inflammatory diseases. The leading question is what, if anything, can we do to prevent these deleterious changes without dangerously dysregulating the precarious balance of productive immunity versus immunopathology? There are many potential new therapeutic means now available to modulate immunosenescence and many others are expected to be available shortly. One main problem in applying these experimental therapies is ethical: there is a common feeling that as ageing is not a disease; the elderly are not sick and therefore do not require adventurous therapies with unpredictable side-effects in mostly frail individuals. Animal models are not helpful in this context. In this chapter we will first briefly review what we think we know about human immunosenescence and its consequences for the health status of elderly individuals. We will then discuss possible interventions that might one day become applicable in an appropriate ethical environment.

Keywords: immunosenescence, T cells, phagocytic cells, nutrition, vaccination, exercise, CMV, inflammaging, IRP, immunorestorative therapies