-
Open Access Emergency Medicine
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Focused versus screening CT scans for evaluation of nontraumatic abdominal pain in the emergency department
Original Research
(1686) Views (610) Full article downloads
Authors: Kristy Thurston, Suma Magge, Robert Fuller, et al
Published Date April 2010
Volume 2010:2 Pages 25 - 27
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S9379
Kristy Thurston, Suma Magge, Robert Fuller, Anthony Voytovich, Jessica Lee, Robert Kozol
University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA
Objective: To evaluate the utility of computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with abdominal pain in the emergency department. We compared focused scans (having a single diagnosis in mind) and screening scans (having no diagnosis or more than one diagnosis in mind) with the hypothesis that focused scans will reveal pathology more often than screening scans. Treatment plans and patient outcomes were also compared between the two populations.
Methods: This is a prospective study in which 100 patients who presented to an academic medical center with abdominal pain and underwent an abdominal CT were enrolled in the study. A chart review was later completed to gather ultimate outcome data for each of the enrolled subjects.
Results: Of the 61 patients having a focused CT, pathology was identified on 63.9% of the scans, which did not differ significantly from the 65.4% of scans that revealed pathology in the screening group. In the focused group, anticipated admissions were reduced, but the reduction was not significant. The screening group did show a significant difference, with eight fewer patients being admitted than initially planned. The total number of patients deemed to require admission was significantly reduced by 15% following all CT scans.
Conclusion: While there was no difference between the focused and screening groups in the rate of identifying pathology, there was a significant decline in number of patients requiring admission to the hospital in the “screening” CT group (when comparing emergency physicians’ pre- and post-CT treatment plans).
Keywords: acute abdominal pain, computed tomography, focused, screening, emergency department
Readers of this article also read:
Exacerbation rate, health status and mortality in COPD – a review of potential interventions
Dronedarone in the management of atrial fibrillation
Antimicrobial prophylaxis in open lower extremity fractures
Solid self-nanoemulsifying cyclosporin A pellets prepared by fluid-bed coating: preparation, characterization and in vitro redispersibility
Editorial
Emerging treatment options for spasticity in multiple sclerosis – clinical utility of cannabinoids
The patterns of toxicity and management of acute nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) overdose
A review of the evidence concerning hepatic glutathione depletion and susceptibility to hepatotoxicity after paracetamol overdose
Update on pediatric dystonias: etiology, epidemiology, and management
- Testimonials
"... I was impressed at the rapidity of publication from submission to final acceptance." Dr Edwin Thrower, PhD, Yale University
- An eight-week yoga intervention is associated with improvements in pain, psychological functioning and mindfulness, and changes in cortisol levels in women with fibromyalgia
- Problems and barriers of pain management in the emergency department: Are we ever going to get better?
- A new transmucosal drug delivery system for patients with breakthrough cancer pain: the fentanyl effervescent buccal tablet
- Anesthesiologists’ perception of patients’ anxiety under regional anesthesia




