-
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Current practicality of nanotechnology in dentistry. Part 1: Focus on nanocomposite restoratives and biomimetics
Review
(6937) Views (5978) Full article downloads
Authors: Scott A Saunders
Published Date November 2009
Volume 2009:1 Pages 47 - 61
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CCIDEN.S7722
Scott A Saunders
MirrorMonitor Creativity, Royersford, PA USA
Abstract: First described in 1959 by physicist Richard P Feynman, who saw it as an unavoidable development in the progress of science, nanotechnology has been part of mainstream scientific theory with potential medical and dental applications since the early 1990s. Nanoparticles, nanospheres, nanorods, nanotubes, nanofibers, dendrimers and other nanostructures have been studied for various applications to biologic tissues and systems. While many layers of nanotechnologic capability have been envisioned for oral health in the last decade (eg, oral hygiene maintenance, local anesthesia, even whole-tooth replacement), few of these applications have been developed. Part 1 of a three-part series reviews the current clinical utility of nanotechnology’s most tangible contribution to dentistry to date: the restoration of tooth structure with nanocomposites. Characterized by filler-particle sizes of ≤100 nm, these materials can offer esthetic and strength advantages over conventional microfilled and hybrid resin-based composite (RBC) systems, primarily in terms of smoothness, polishability and precision of shade characterization, plus flexural strength and microhardness similar to those of the better-performing posterior RBCs. Available comparative data for nanocomposites and organically-modified ceramic (Ormocer®) restoratives are also reviewed. Finally, plausible “next-phase” trends in current nanorestorative research are judiciously examined, including 1) calcium-, phosphate-, and fluoride-ion-releasing nanocomposites for anticaries applications and 2) restorative systems based on biomimetic emulation of the nanomolecular assembly processes inherent in dental enamel formation using nanorods, nanospheres, and recombinant amelogenins.
Keywords: nanostructure, dental restorative, resin-based composite, biomimetic, amelogenin
Readers of this article also read:
Radiolucency below the crown of mandibular horizontal incompletely impacted third molars and acute inflammation in men with diabetes
Berberine: metabolic and cardiovascular effects in preclinical and clinical trials
Potential renovascular hypertension, space missions, and the role of magnesium
Critical appraisal of the role of glucosamine and chondroitin in the management of osteoarthritis of the knee
Ego mechanisms of defense are associated with patients’ preference of treatment modality independent of psychological distress in end-stage renal disease
Can a gentamicin-specific chart reduce neonatal medication errors?
Nephroprotective action of glycosaminoglycans: why the pharmacological properties of sulodexide might be reconsidered
Dashboards in neonatology
Advances in dental veneers: materials, applications, and techniques
- Testimonials
"You do a tremendous job!!" Ruben Restrepo, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
- Current practicality of nanotechnology in dentistry. Part 1: Focus on nanocomposite restoratives and biomimetics
- Bone resorption in incompletely impacted mandibular third molars and acute pericoronitis
- Radiolucency below the crown of mandibular horizontal incompletely impacted third molars and acute inflammation in men with diabetes
- Periosteoplasty for covering gingival recessions: Clinical results




