Cost-effectiveness study of oral hypoglycemic agents in the treatment of outpatients with type 2 diabetes attending a public primary care clinic in Mexico City
Authors Díaz de León-Castañeda C, Altagracia-Martínez M, Kravzov-Jinich J, Cárdenas-Elizalde MR, Moreno-Bonett C, Martínez-Núñez JM
Published Date March 2012 Volume 2012:4 Pages 57—65
Received 1 November 2011, Accepted 29 November 2011, Published 7 March 2012
Christian Díaz de León-Castañeda, Marina Altagracia-Martínez, Jaime Kravzov-Jinich, Ma del Rosario Cárdenas-Elizalde, Consuelo Moreno-Bonett, Juan Manuel Martínez-Núñez
Department of Biological Systems and Health Care, Biological and Health Sciences Division, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana-Xochimilco, Mexico DF, Mexico
Introduction: Worldwide, diabetes mellitus presents a high burden for individuals and society. In Latin America, many people with diabetes have limited access to health care, which means that indirect costs may exceed direct health care cost. Diabetes is Mexico's leading cause of death.
Purpose: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness ratios of the most used oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) in the treatment of outpatients with type 2 diabetes attending a public primary care clinic in Mexico City.
Design: A cross-sectional and analytic study was conducted in Mexico City.
Methodology: Twenty-seven adult outpatients with type 2 diabetes who were treated either with metformin or glibenclamide were included. Acarbose was used as an alternative strategy. The study was carried out from the perspective of Mexican society. Direct medical and nonmedical costs as well as indirect costs were evaluated using a structured questionnaire. Efficacies of all drug treatments were evaluated retrospectively. A systematic search was conducted to select published randomized clinical trials based on predetermined inclusion criteria, and treatment success was defined as glycosylated hemoglobin factor ≤ 7%. Efficacy data of each drug and/or combination were analyzed using meta-analysis. The Monte Carlo Markov model was used. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) were used as the unit of effectiveness; incremental and sensitive analyses were performed and a 5% discount rate was calculated. A hypothetical cohort of 10,000 patients was modeled.
Results: The odds ratios of the success of each drug treatment were obtained from the meta-analyses, and were the following: 5.82 (glibenclamide), 3.86 (metformin), 3.5 (acarbose), and 6.76 (metformin–glibenclamide). The cost-effectiveness ratios found were US$272.63/QALY (glibenclamide), US$296.48/QALY (metformin), and US$409.86/QALY (acarbose). Sensitivity analysis did not show changes for the most cost-effective therapy when the effectiveness probabilities or treatment costs were modified.
Conclusion: Glibenclamide is the most cost-effective treatment for the present study outpatient population diagnosed with type 2 diabetes in the early stages.
Keywords: cost-effectiveness, hypoglycemic, outpatients, type 2 diabetes
This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php
Other article by this author:
Altagracia-Martinez M, Kravzov-Jinich J, Martínez-Núñez JM, Ríos-Castañeda C, López-Naranjo F
Published Date: 8 June 2012
Readers of this article also read:
Wong AWY, Zhang C, Chu CH
Published Date: 8 May 2014
Single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of apixaban in healthy Chinese subjects [Corrigendum]
Cui Y, Song Y, Wang J, Yu Z, Schuster A, Barrett YC, Frost C
Published Date: 27 March 2014
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of acetylsalicylic acid after intravenous and oral administration to healthy volunteers
Nagelschmitz J, Blunck M, Kraetzschmar J, Ludwig M, Wensing G, Hohlfeld T
Published Date: 19 March 2014
Kunisawa T, Kasai H, Suda M, Yoshimura M, Sugawara A, Izumi Y, Iida T, Kurosawa A, Iwasaki H
Published Date: 4 March 2014
Gao B, Doan A, Hybertson BM
Published Date: 3 February 2014
Glycemic control and diabetes-related health care costs in type 2 diabetes; retrospective analysis based on clinical and administrative databases
Degli Esposti L, Saragoni S, Buda S, Sturani A, Degli Esposti E
Published Date: 14 May 2013
Cost-effectiveness of dronedarone and standard of care compared with standard of care alone: US results of an ATHENA lifetime model
Reynolds MR, Nilsson J, Åkerborg Ö, Jhaveri M, Lindgren P
Published Date: 8 January 2013
Abdulameer SA, Syed Sulaiman SA, Hassali MA, Subramaniam K, Sahib MN
Published Date: 11 June 2012
Cumulative clinical experience from over a decade of use of levofloxacin in community-acquired pneumonia: critical appraisal and role in therapy
Noreddin AM, Elkhatib WF, Cunnion KM, Zhanel GG
Published Date: 7 October 2011
Published Date: 18 August 2011