-
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
-
About Dovepress
Open access peer-reviewed scientific and medical journals.
-
Open Access
Dove Medical Press is now a member of the Open Access Initiative
-
An Author's Guide
A guide to help authors get their paper published.
-
Advocacy
Support Open Access and Dove Press
-
Reprints
Promotional Article Monitoring - further details
-
Favored Author Program
Real benefits for authors, including fast-track processing of papers.
Comparative evaluation of prophylactic single-dose intravenous antibiotic with postoperative antibiotics in elective urologic surgery
Original Research
(1864) Views (402) Full article downloads
Authors: Mohammad K Moslemi, Seyed M Moosavi Movahed, Akram Heidari, et al
Published Date November 2010
Volume 2010:6 Pages 551 - 556
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S12512
Mohammad K Moslemi1, Seyed M Moosavi Movahed2, Akram Heidari3, Hossein Saghafi2, Mehdi Abedinzadeh41Department of Urology, 2Department of Nephrology, 3Department of Health, Kamkar Hospital, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran; 4Department of Urology, Moradi Hospital, School of Medicine, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran
Background: Unrestricted antibiotic use is very common in Iran. As a result, emergence of resistant organisms is commonplace. Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery consists of a short antibiotic course given immediately before the procedure in order to prevent development of a surgical site infection. The basic principle of prophylaxis is to maintain effective concentrations of an antibiotic active against the commonest pathogens during the entire surgery.
Materials and methods: We prospectively investigated 427 urologic surgery cases in our department between August 2008 and September 2009 (Group1). As reference cases, we retrospectively reviewed 966 patients who underwent urologic surgery between May 2004 and May 2008 (Group 2) who were administered antibiotics without any restriction. Prophylactic antibiotics such as cefazolin were administered intravenously according to our protocol. Postoperative body temperature, peripheral white blood cell counts, urinalysis, and urine culture were checked.
Results: To judge perioperative infections, wound condition and general condition were evaluated in terms of surgical site infection, as well as remote infection and urinary tract infection, up to postoperative day 30. Surgical site infection was defined as the presence of swelling, tenderness, redness, or drainage of pus from the wound, superficially or deeply. Remote infection was defined as occurrence of pneumonia, sepsis, or urinary tract infection. Perioperative infection rates (for surgical site and remote infection) in Group 1 and Group 2 were nine of 427 (2.6%) and 24 of 966 (2.5%), respectively. Surgical site infection rates of categories A and B in Group 1 were 0 and two (0.86%), respectively, while those in Group 2 were 0 and five (0.92%), respectively. There was no significant difference in infection rates in terms of remote infection and surgical site infection between Group 1 and Group 2 (P = 0.670). The amounts, as well as the prices, for intravenously administered antibiotics decreased to approximately one quarter.
Conclusion: Our protocol effectively decreased the amount of antibiotics used without increasing perioperative infection rates. Thus, our protocol of prophylactic antibiotic therapy can be recommended as an appropriate method for preventing perioperative infection in urologic surgery.
Keywords: surgical site infection, antibiotic prophylaxis, single dose, urologic surgery
Other articles by Professor Mohammad Kazem Moslemi
Evaluation of biochemical urinary stone composition and its relationship to tap water hardness in Qom province, central Iran
Evaluation of epidemiology, safety, and complications of male circumcision using conventional dissection surgery: experience at one center
Evaluation of prostate cancer prevalence in Iranian male population with increased PSA level, a one center experience
Genitourinary system trauma after 2003 Bam earthquake in Kerman, Iran
Mathieu repair of distal and midshaft hypospadias: risks and benefits of foreskin reconstruction versus circumcision
Selenium–vitamin E supplementation in infertile men: effects on semen parameters and pregnancy rate
Urologist-operated ultrasound and its use in urological outpatient clinics
Readers of this article also read:
High-throughput approaches to investigate neutral lipid biosynthesis
Refinement of rigid-body protein–protein docking using backbone and side-chain minimization with a coarse-grained model
Resistance and the management of complicated skin and skin structure infections: the role of ceftobiprole
Deletion of PPAR-γ in immune cells enhances susceptibility to antiglomerular basement membrane disease
Effects of recombinant growth hormone replacement and physical rehabilitation in recovery of gross motor function in children with cerebral palsy
Erratum
Improvement of adenoviral vector-mediated gene transfer to airway epithelia by folate-modified anionic liposomes
Antidepressant-induced akathisia-related homicides associated with diminishing mutations in metabolizing genes of the CYP450 family
An analysis of the Bateson Review of research using nonhuman primates
- Have an opinion about one of our articles?
We encourage you to write a Letter to the Editor
- American Acne and Rosacea Society
The American Acne and Rosacea Society (AARS), is a 501(c)(6) non-profit organization dedicated to elevating the understanding and treatment of acne and rosacea.
- The benefits and risks of testosterone replacement therapy: a review
- Tenofovir-associated bone density loss
- Drug design with Cdc7 kinase: a potential novel cancer therapy target
- Development of mucosal adjuvants for intranasal vaccine for H5N1 influenza viruses




