Back to Browse Journals » International Journal of Nanomedicine » Volume 1 » Issue 1

Selective adhesion and mineral deposition by osteoblasts on carbon nanofiber patterns

Authors Dongwoo Khang, Michiko Sato, Rachel L Price, Alexander E Ribbe Thomas J Webster

Published Date January 2006 Volume 2006:1(1) Pages 65—72

DOI

Published 25 January 2006

Dongwoo Khang1, Michiko Sato4, Rachel L Price2, Alexander E Ribbe3
Thomas J Webster2,4

1Department of Physics, 2Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering, 3Purdue Laboratory of Chemical Nanotechnology and Departments of Chemistry, and 4School of Materials Engineering, Purdue

Abstract: In an effort to develop better orthopedic implants, osteoblast (bone-forming cells) adhesion was determined on microscale patterns (30 μm lines) of carbon nanofibers placed on polymer substrates. Patterns of carbon nanofibers (CNFs) on a model polymer (polycarbonate urethane [PCU]) were developed using an imprinting method that placed CNFs in selected regions. Results showed the selective adhesion and alignment of osteoblasts on CNF patterns placed on PCU. Results also showed greater attraction forces between fibronectin and CNF (compared with PCU) patterns using atomic force microscope force-displacement curves. Because fibronectin is a protein that mediates osteoblast adhesion, these results provide a mechanism of why osteoblast adhesion was directed towards CNF patterns. Lastly, this study showed that the directed osteoblast adhesion on CNF patterns translated to enhanced calcium phosphate mineral deposition along linear patterns of CNFs on PCU. Since CNFs are conductive materials, this study formulated substrates that through electrical stimulation could be used in future investigations to further promote osteoblasts to deposit anisotropic patterns of calcium containing mineral similar to that observed in long bones.

Keywords: carbon nanotubes, carbon nanofibers, osteoblasts, orthopedic, biomaterials, alignment

Download Article [PDF] 

Readers of this article also read:

Variability in contrast agent uptake by different but similar stem cell types

Ketkar-Atre A, Struys T, Soenen SJ, Lambrichts I, Verfaillie CM, De Cuyper M, Himmelreich U

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2013, 8:4577-4591

Published Date: 29 November 2013

Preparation, characterization, and in vivo pharmacokinetics of nanostructured lipid carriers loaded with oleanolic acid and gentiopicrin

Zhang KC, Lv SW, Li XY, Feng YF, Li X, Liu L, Li S, Li YJ

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2013, 8:3227-3239

Published Date: 22 August 2013

Using poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres to encapsulate plasmid of bone morphogenetic protein 2/polyethylenimine nanoparticles to promote bone formation in vitro and in vivo

Qiao C, Zhang K, Jin H, Miao L, Shi C, Liu X, Yuan A, Liu J, Li D, Zheng C, Zhang G, Li X, Yang B, Sun H

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2013, 8:2985-2995

Published Date: 13 August 2013

Surgical outcomes in phacoemulsification after application of a risk stratification system

Tsinopoulos IT, Lamprogiannis LP, Tsaousis KT, Mataftsi A, Symeonidis C, Chalvatzis NT, Dimitrakos SA

Clinical Ophthalmology 2013, 7:895-899

Published Date: 16 May 2013

Hydrophobic ion pairing of an insulin-sodium deoxycholate complex for oral delivery of insulin

Sun S, Liang N, Kawashima Y, Xia D, Cui F

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:3049-3056

Published Date: 28 November 2011

Corrigendum

Sailasuta N, Harris K, Tran T, Ross B

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2011, 7:707-708

Published Date: 25 November 2011