Back to Browse Journals » Vascular Health and Risk Management » Volume 4 » Issue 5

Maintenance of improved lipid levels following attendance at a cardiovascular risk reduction clinic: a 10-year experience

Authors Glen J Pearson, Kari L Olson, Nicole E Panich, Sumit R Majumdar, Ross T Tsuyuki, et al

Published Date August 2008 Volume 2008:4(5) Pages 1127—1135

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S3748

Published 18 August 2008

Glen J Pearson1,5, Kari L Olson6, Nicole E Panich1, Sumit R Majumdar2,5, Ross T Tsuyuki1,4, Dawna M Gilchrist2,5, Ali Damani4, Gordon A Francis3,5

The MILLARR Study (Maintenance of Improved Lipid Levels Following Attendance at a Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Clinic) 1Department of Medicine, Divisions of Cardiology; 2General Internal Medicine; 3Endocrinology and Metabolism; Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences; 4University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; 5Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Clinic (CRRC), University of Alberta Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; 6University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado, USA; 7Family Medicine (Private Practice), Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Background: Specialty cardiovascular risk reduction clinics (CRRC) increase the proportion of patients attaining recommended lipid targets; however, it is not known if the benefits are sustained after discharge. We evaluated the impact of a CRRC on lipid levels and assessed the long-term effect of a CRRC in maintaining improved lipid levels following discharge.

Methods: The medical records of consecutive dyslipidemic patients discharged >6 months from a tertiary hospital CRRC from January 1991 to January 2001 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was the change in patients’ lipid levels between the final CRRC visit and the most recent primary care follow-up. A worst-case analysis was conducted to evaluate the potential impact of the patients in whom the follow-up lipid profiles post-discharge from the CRRC were not obtained.

Results: Within the CRRC (median follow-up = 1.28 years in 1064 patients), we observed statistically significant improvements in all lipid parameters. In the 411 patients for whom post-discharge lipid profiles were available (median follow-up = 2.41 years), there were no significant differences observed in low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, total cholesterol (TC), or triglycerides since CRRC discharge; however, there were small improvements in high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) and TC:HDL ratio (p < 0.05 for both). The unadjusted worst-case analysis (653 patients with no follow-up lipid profiles) demonstrated statistically significant worsening of all lipid parameters between CRRC discharge and the most recent follow-up. However, when the change in lipid parameters between the baseline and the most recent follow-up was assessed in this analysis, the changes in all lipid parameters were significantly improved (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that a CRRC can improve lipid levels and suggests that these benefits are sustained once patients are returned to the care of their primary physician.

Keywords: cardiovascular risk factors, dyslipidemia, outcomes, pharmacotherapy, secondary prevention

Download Article [PDF] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Readers of this article also read:

Cardiac allograft immune activation: current perspectives

Chang D, Kobashigawa J

Transplant Research and Risk Management 2015, 7:13-22

Published Date: 18 December 2014

Ex vivo and in vivo evaluation of an ultrasonic device for precise dissection, coagulation, and transection

Bertke BD, Scoggins PJ, Welling AL, Widenhouse TV, Chen C, Kallakuri S, Cavanaugh JM, Clymer JW, Amaral JF

Open Access Surgery 2015, 8:1-7

Published Date: 18 December 2014

Renal interstitial fibrosis induced by high-dose mesoporous silica nanoparticles via the NF-κB signaling pathway

Chen X, Zhouhua W, Jie Z, Xinlu F, Jinqiang L, Yuwen Q, Zhiying H

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015, 10:1-22

Published Date: 18 December 2014

Transmyocardial revascularization devices: technology update

Kindzelski BA, Zhou Y, Horvath KA

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 2015, 8:11-19

Published Date: 18 December 2014

Surface modifications of silica nanoparticles are crucial for their inert versus proinflammatory and immunomodulatory properties

Marzaioli V, Aguilar-Pimentel JA, Weichenmeier I, Luxenhofer G, Wiemann M, Landsiedel R, Wohlleben W, Eiden S, Mempel M, Behrendt H, Schmidt-Weber C, Gutermuth J, Alessandrini F

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:2815-2832

Published Date: 5 June 2014

Porous microsphere and its applications

Cai Y, Chen Y, Hong X, Liu Z, Yuan W

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2013, 8:1111-1120

Published Date: 15 March 2013

Semantics, pragmatics, and formal thought disorders in people with schizophrenia

Salavera C, Puyuelo M, Antoñanzas JL, Teruel P

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2013, 9:177-183

Published Date: 7 February 2013

Application of magnetically induced hyperthermia in the model protozoan Crithidia fasciculata as a potential therapy against parasitic infections

Grazú V, Silber AM, Moros M, Asín L, Torres TE, Marquina C, Ibarra MR, Goya GF

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5351-5360

Published Date: 8 October 2012

Aminopropyltriethoxysilane-mediated surface functionalization of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and in vitro toxicity assay

Wang S, Wen S, Shen M, Guo R, Cao X, Wang J, Shi X

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:3449-3459

Published Date: 20 December 2011