Back to Browse Journals » Clinical Interventions in Aging » Volume 2 » Issue 2

Reducing the distance in distance-caregiving by technology innovation

Authors Lazelle E Benefield, Cornelia Beck

Published Date August 2007 Volume 2007:2(2) Pages 267—272

DOI

Published 14 August 2007

Lazelle E Benefield1, Cornelia Beck2

1College of Nursing, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA; 2Pat & Willard Walker Family Memory Research Center, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA

Abstract: Family caregivers are responsible for the home care of over 34 million older adults in the United States. For many, the elder family member lives more than an hour’s distance away. Distance caregiving is a growing alternative to more familiar models where: 1) the elder and the family caregiver(s) may reside in the same household; or 2) the family caregiver may live nearby but not in the same household as the elder. The distance caregiving model involves elders and their family caregivers who live at some distance, defined as more than a 60-minute commute, from one another. Evidence suggests that distance caregiving is a distinct phenomenon, differs substantially from on-site family caregiving, and requires additional assistance to support the physical, social, and contextual dimensions of the caregiving process. Technology-based assists could virtually connect the caregiver and elder and provide strong support that addresses the elder’s physical, social, cognitive, and/or sensory impairments. Therefore, in today’s era of high technology, it is surprising that so few affordable innovations are being marketed for distance caregiving. This article addresses distance caregiving, proposes the use of technology innovation to support caregiving, and suggests a research agenda to better inform policy decisions related to the unique needs of this situation.

Keywords: caregiving, family, distance, technology, elders

Download Article [PDF] 

Readers of this article also read:

CdTe quantum dots induce activation of human platelets: implications for nanoparticle hemocompatibility

Samuel SP, Santos-Martinez MJ, Medina C, Jain N, Radomski MW, Prina-Mello A, Volkov Y

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015, 10:2723-2734

Published Date: 2 April 2015

Do calcifying nanoparticles really contain 16S rDNA?

Shiekh FA

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5051-5052

Published Date: 18 September 2012

Erratum

Marusza W, Mlynarczyk G, Olszanski R, Netsvyetayeva I, Obrowski M, Iannitti T, Palmieri B

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4119-4120

Published Date: 27 July 2012

Corrigendum

Chen ZQ, Liu Y, Zhao JH, Wang L, Feng NP

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:1709-1710

Published Date: 30 March 2012

Further data on the association between Helicobacter pylori infection and primary open-angle glaucoma

Zavos C, Kountouras J

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:243-245

Published Date: 10 February 2012

Corrigendum: Softec HD hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens: biocompatibility and precision

Espandar L, Sikder S, Moshirfar M

Clinical Ophthalmology 2011, 5:159-160

Published Date: 6 February 2011

Erratum

RA Kurt, K Gündüz

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:981-982

Published Date: 6 September 2010