Back to Browse Journals » Medicolegal and Bioethics » Volume 1

An analysis of the Bateson Review of research using nonhuman primates

Authors Greek R, Hansen LA, Menache A

Published Date December 2011 Volume 2011:1 Pages 3—22

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/MB.S25938

Published 6 December 2011

Ray Greek1, Lawrence A Hansen2, Andre Menache1
1Americans for Medical Advancement, Goleta, 2Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA

Abstract: An analysis of the use of nonhuman primates in biomedical research in the UK, the Review of Research Using Non-Human Primates (the "Bateson Review") was released in 2011. The review was applauded, to varying degrees, by most of the stakeholders in the controversy over using nonhuman primates in biomedical research. However, there has not been a scientific analysis of the review. In this paper, the Bateson Review is examined for both methodology and the science relevant to the use of nonhuman primates in biomedical research. The relevant science includes complexity theory, evolutionary biology, genetics, empirical evidence regarding the reliability of interspecies extrapolation, and the value of basic biomedical research in general in making discoveries that lead to human treatments. The authors of this paper conclude that the Bateson Review does not meet the criteria for a scientific assessment, in part, because it fails to consider the current science that impacts on the practice of using animals, in general, and nonhuman primates, specifically, in biomedical research. This lack of scientific consideration has legal and ethical ramifications. Since the Bateson Review fails as a scientific evaluation, the ethical and legal recommendations that are based on science are also suspect.

Keywords:
medicine, complex, evolution, ethics, primate, research

Download Article [PDF] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Readers of this article also read:

Bone resorption in incompletely impacted mandibular third molars and acute pericoronitis

Minoru Yamaoka, Yusuke Ono, Masahiro Takahashi, Ryosuke Doto, et al.

Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dentistry 2009, 1:7-12

Published Date: 14 April 2009

Amino acid-responsive Crohn's disease: a case study

Alvin Stein, Marty Hinz, Thomas Uncini

Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology 2010, 3:171-177

Published Date: 6 December 2010

Amino acid management of Parkinson’s disease: a case study

Marty Hinz, Alvin Stein, Thomas Uncini

International Journal of General Medicine 2011, 4:165-174

Published Date: 28 February 2011

Newer agents in antiplatelet therapy: a review

Yeung J, Holinstat M

Journal of Blood Medicine 2012, 3:33-42

Published Date: 25 June 2012

REACH, animal testing, and the precautionary principle

Menache A, Nastrucci C

Medicolegal and Bioethics 2012, 2:13-29

Published Date: 6 August 2012

Biological evaluation of protein nanocapsules containing doxorubicin

Toita R, Murata M, Abe K, Narahara S, Piao JS, Kang JH, Ohuchida K, Hashizume M

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2013, 8:1989-1999

Published Date: 17 May 2013