Back to Browse Journals » Neurobehavioral HIV Medicine » Volume 3

A comparison of screening batteries in the detection of neurocognitive impairment in HIV-infected Spanish speakers

Authors Levine AJ, Palomo M, Hinkin CH, Valdes-Sueiras M, Lopez E, Mathisen G, Donovan S, Singer EJ

Published Date September 2011 Volume 2011:3 Pages 79—86

DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/NBHIV.S22553

Published 26 September 2011

Andrew J Levine1, Manuel Palomo1, Charles H Hinkin2,3, Miguel Valdes-Sueiras1,5, Enrique Lopez3,4, Glenn Mathisen1,5, Suzanne Donovan1,5, Elyse J Singer1
1National Neurological AIDS Bank, Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 2Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, 3Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, 4Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles; 5Olive View-UCLA Medical Center, Sylmar, CA, USA

Background: A substantial number of Spanish-speaking individuals from Mexico and Central America are now living in the United States. These individuals are at heightened risk for HIV infection and, due to late diagnosis and limited resources, for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND). Early detection is key, yet adequate methods for detecting HAND in Spanish speakers, especially in resource-poor areas, remains problematic. Therefore, it is necessary to identify accurate yet efficient neurocognitive screening tools that are appropriate for use in resource-limited AIDS clinics serving Spanish-speaking patients.
Methods: Twenty-one Spanish-speaking, HIV-positive adults who migrated from Mexico or Central America underwent neuromedical and neurocognitive evaluation in Spanish. The concordance of three neurocognitive screening measures (the HIV Dementia Scale [HDS], the Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE], and the NEUROPSI) with a comprehensive neuropsychological battery was examined. In addition, accuracy in detecting neurocognitive impairment using standard and alternative cutoff scores was examined.
Results: The HDS and the NEUROPSI showed high correlation with the comprehensive neuropsychological battery. The HDS and the NEUROPSI also had the highest sensitivity (67% and 75%, respectively) and specificity (50% and 38%, respectively). Both measures also showed greater sensitivity than the MMSE to very mild forms of HAND.
Conclusion: In this small sample of HIV-positive Spanish speakers from Mexico and Central America living in the United States, the HDS and the NEUROPSI demonstrated reasonable accuracy in detecting neurocognitive impairment, while the MMSE demonstrated very poor accuracy. The HDS and the NEUROPSI were equally sensitive in detecting mild HAND. Continued test development is required to capture this disorder, especially in resource-limited settings.

Keywords: HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders, Spanish speaking, NEUROPSI, HIV Dementia Scale, Mini-Mental State Examination

Download Article [PDF] 

Creative Commons License This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php

Other article by this author:

CCL3 genotype and current depression increase risk of HIV-associated dementia

Andrew J Levine, Elyse J Singer, Janet S Sinsheimer, et al

Neurobehavioral HIV Medicine 2009, 1:1-7

Published Date: 17 November 2009

Readers of this article also read:

Design and in vivo evaluation of oxycodone once-a-day controlled-release tablets

Kim JY, Lee SH, Park CW, Rhee YS, Kim DW, Park J, Lee M, Seo JW, Park ES

Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2015, 9:695-706

Published Date: 30 January 2015

Progressive osseous heteroplasia: diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis

Pignolo RJ, Ramaswamy G, Fong JT, Shore EM, Kaplan FS

The Application of Clinical Genetics 2015, 8:37-48

Published Date: 30 January 2015

Gastrointestinal robotic surgery: challenges and developments

Bencini L, Annecchiarico M, Di Marino M, Moraldi L, Perna F, Coratti A

Robotic Surgery: Research and Reviews 2015, 2:11-27

Published Date: 30 January 2015

Diabetes reversal via gene transfer: building on successes in animal models

Gerace D, Martiniello-Wilks R, Simpson AM

Research and Reports in Endocrine Disorders 2015, 5:15-29

Published Date: 29 January 2015

Corneal laceration caused by river crab

Vinuthinee N, Azreen-Redzal A, Juanarita J, Zunaina E

Clinical Ophthalmology 2015, 9:203-206

Published Date: 29 January 2015

Pain catastrophizing as a risk factor for chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review

Burns LC, Ritvo SE, Ferguson MK, Clarke H, Seltzer Z, Katz J

Journal of Pain Research 2015, 8:21-32

Published Date: 5 January 2015

Effects of Arthro-7® in relieving symptoms of osteoarthritis with mild to moderate arthralgia [Corrigendum]

Xie Q, Zhou T, Yen L, Shariff M, Nguyen T, Kami K, Gu P, Liang L, Rao J, Shi R

Nutrition and Dietary Supplements 2013, 5:7-8

Published Date: 16 May 2013

Erratum

Kawaji H, Ishii M, Tamaki Y, Sasaki K, Takagi M

Orthopedic Research and Reviews 2012, 4:103-104

Published Date: 8 November 2012