Venous thromboembolism risk assessments on trauma patients has suboptimal interobserver reliability among inexperienced clinicians (fourth-year medical students)
Authors Chendrasekhar A, Aleti S
Received 9 January 2018
Accepted for publication 29 March 2018
Published 18 June 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 225—231
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Andrew Yee
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Akella Chendrasekhar,1,2 Sireesha Aleti2
1State University of New York Downstate, Brooklyn, NY, USA; 2Department of Surgery, Richmond University Medical Center, Staten Island, NY, USA
Background: Venous thromboembolic disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients worldwide. The objective of this study is to compare interobserver reliability for qualitative and quantitative venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessments in hospitalized trauma patients.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective medical record review of 40 randomly selected trauma patients admitted to a 448-bed urban level-I trauma center from January 2013 to January 2014. Interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated based on a two-way mixed model. The sample was equally distributed between patients admitted to the floor and the intensive care unit (ICU). Eight fourth-year medical students performed the risk assessments by the medical record. Two forms for risk assessment were used: a qualitative screening and a quantitative screening. The composite of intraobserver and interobserver variabilities was determined.
Results: The ICC for qualitative VTE risk assessments was 0.845 and for quantitative VTE risk assessment was 0.628.
Conclusion: To optimize accuracy of VTE risk stratification and appropriate prophylaxis, medical students and first-year residents should be formally trained to perform quantitative assessments.
Keywords: venous thromboembolism, risk assessment, qualitative analysis, quantitative analysis, prophylaxis, interobserver reliability
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]