Back to Journals » Clinical Epidemiology » Volume 7

Validity of a hospital-based obstetric register using medical records as reference

Authors Brixval CS, Thygesen L, Johansen N, Rørbye C, Weber T, Due P, Koushede V

Received 3 August 2015

Accepted for publication 21 October 2015

Published 26 November 2015 Volume 2015:7 Pages 509—515

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S93675

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Christian Fynbo Christiansen

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Henrik Toft Sørensen


Carina Sjöberg Brixval,1 Lau Caspar Thygesen,1 Nanna Roed Johansen,2 Christina Rørbye,3 Tom Weber,3 Pernille Due,1 Vibeke Koushede1

1National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Copenhagen University Hospital, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark

Background: Data from hospital-based registers and medical records offer valuable sources of information for clinical and epidemiological research purposes. However, conducting high-quality epidemiological research requires valid and complete data sources.
Objective: To assess completeness and validity of a hospital-based clinical register – the Obstetric Database – using a national register and medical records as references.
Methods: We assessed completeness of a hospital-based clinical register – the Obstetric Database – by linking data from all women registered in the Obstetric Database as having given birth in 2013 to the National Patient Register with coverage of all births in 2013. Validity of eleven selected indicators from the Obstetric Database was assessed using medical records as a golden standard. Using a random sample of 250 medical records, we calculated proportion of agreement, sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for each indicator. Two assessors independently reviewed medical records and inter-rater reliability was calculated as proportion of agreement and Cohen's κ coefficient.
Results: We found 100% completeness of the Obstetric Database when compared to the Danish National Patient Register. Except for one delivery all 6,717 deliveries were present in both registers. Proportion of agreement between the Obstetric Database and medical records ranged from 91.1% to 99.6% for the eleven indicators. The validity measures ranged from 0.70 to 1.00 indicating high validity of the Obstetric Database. κ coefficients from the inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.71 to 1.00.
Conclusion: Completeness and validity of the Obstetric Database were found acceptable when using the National Patient Register and medical records as golden standards. The Obstetric Database therefore offers a valuable source for examining clinical, administrative, and research questions.

Keywords: obstetric register, register-based, hospital register, validity, completeness

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]