Validation of self-reported and hospital-diagnosed atrial fibrillation: the HUNT-study
Authors Malmo V, Langhammer A, Bønaa KH, Loennechen J, Ellekjaer H
Received 30 December 2015
Accepted for publication 19 February 2016
Published 11 June 2016 Volume 2016:8 Pages 185—193
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Henrik Toft Sørensen
Vegard Malmo,1,2 Arnulf Langhammer,3 Kaare H Bønaa,2,3,4 Jan P Loennechen,1,2 Hanne Ellekjaer5,6
1Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 2Department of Cardiology, St Olav’s Hospital, 3Department of Public Health and General Practice, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, 4Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromso, 5Stroke Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, St Olav’s Hospital, 6Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
Background: Self-reported atrial fibrillation (AF) and diagnoses from hospital registers are often used to identify persons with AF. The objective of this study was to validate self-reported AF and hospital discharge diagnoses of AF among participants in a population-based study.
Materials and methods: Among 50,805 persons who participated in the third survey of the HUNT Study (HUNT3), 16,247 participants from three municipalities were included. Individuals who reported cardiovascular disease, renal disease, or hypertension in the main questionnaire received a cardiovascular-specific questionnaire. An affirmative answer to a question on physician-diagnosed AF in this second questionnaire defined self-reported AF diagnoses in the study. In addition, AF diagnoses were retrieved from hospital and primary care (PC) registers. All AF diagnoses were verified by review of hospital and PC medical records.
Results: A total of 502 HUNT3 participants had a diagnosis of AF verified in hospital or PC records. Of these, 249 reported their AF diagnosis in the HUNT3 questionnaires and 370 had an AF diagnosis in hospital discharge registers before participation in HUNT3. The sensitivity of self-reported AF in HUNT3 was 49.6%, specificity 99.2%, positive predictive value (PPV) 66.2%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 98.4%. The sensitivity of a hospital discharge diagnosis of AF was 73.7%, specificity 99.7%, PPV 88.5%, and NPV 99.2%.
Conclusion: Use of questionnaires alone to identify cases of AF has low sensitivity. Extraction of diagnoses from health care registers enhances the sensitivity substantially and should be applied when estimates of incidence and prevalence of AF are studied.
Keywords: atrial fibrillation, epidemiology, diagnosis, questionnaire, validation
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]