Validation of an instrument to measure patients’ experiences of medicine use: the Living with Medicines Questionnaire
Authors Krska J, Katusiime B, Corlett SA
Received 4 November 2016
Accepted for publication 7 February 2017
Published 28 March 2017 Volume 2017:11 Pages 671—679
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Qian Ding
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Johnny Chen
Janet Krska, Barbra Katusiime, Sarah A Corlett
Medway School of Pharmacy, The Universities of Kent and Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, UK
Background: Medicine-related burden is an increasingly recognized concept, stemming from the rising tide of polypharmacy, which may impact on patient behaviors, including nonadherence. No instruments currently exist which specifically measure medicine-related burden. The Living with Medicines Questionnaire (LMQ) was developed for this purpose.
Objective: This study validated the LMQ in a sample of adults using regular prescription medicines in the UK.
Methods: Questionnaires were distributed in community pharmacies and public places in southeast England or online through UK health websites and social media. A total of 1,177 were returned: 507 (43.1%) from pharmacy distribution and 670 (56.9%) online. Construct validity was assessed by principal components analysis and item reduction undertaken on the original 60-item pool. Known-groups analysis assessed differences in mean total scores between participants using different numbers of medicines and between those who did or did not require assistance with medicine use. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha. Free-text comments were analyzed thematically to substantiate underlying dimensions.
Results: A 42-item, eight-factor structure comprising intercorrelated dimensions (patient–doctor relationships and communication about medicines, patient–pharmacist communication about medicines, interferences with daily life, practical difficulties, effectiveness, acceptance of medicine use, autonomy/control over medicines and concerns about medicine use) was derived, which explained 57.4% of the total variation. Six of the eight subscales had acceptable internal consistency (α>0.7). More positive experiences were observed among patients using eight or fewer medicines compared to nine or more, and those independent with managing/using their medicines versus those requiring assistance. Free-text comments, provided by almost a third of the respondents, supported the domains identified.
Conclusion: The resultant LMQ-2 is a valid and reliable multidimensional measure of prescription medicine use experiences, which covers more diverse domains than existing questionnaires. However, further validation work is necessary.
Keywords: medicines, polypharmacy, patient experience, questionnaire, validation
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]
Other articles by this author:
Medicine-related services in community pharmacy: public preferences for pharmacy attributes and promotional methods and comparison with pharmacists' perceptions
Gammie SM, Rodgers RM, Loo RL, Corlett SA, Krska J
Published Date: 7 November 2016
Katusiime B, Corlett S, Reeve J, Krska J
Published Date: 4 October 2016
Comparison of pharmacist and public views and experiences of community pharmacy medicines-related services in England
Rodgers RM, Gammie SM, Loo RL, Corlett SA, Krska J
Published Date: 9 September 2016