Usefulness of plasma D-dimer level for monitoring development of distant organ metastasis in colorectal cancer patients after curative resection
Authors Guo Y, Chen F, Cui W
Received 14 June 2018
Accepted for publication 14 August 2018
Published 4 October 2018 Volume 2018:10 Pages 4203—4216
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Andrew Yee
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Beicheng Sun
Yi Guo, Feng Chen, Wei Cui
State Key Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Department of Clinical Laboratory, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China
Purpose: To investigate the usefulness of plasma D-dimer level for monitoring the development of distant organ metastasis in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients after curative resection.
Patients and methods: One hundred and seventy-eight CRC patients after curative resection were enrolled in the study. Ninety-two patients developed distant organ metastasis during follow-up (metachronous metastasis), and blood was collected on the day metastasis was confirmed. Eighty-six patients had no evidence of metastasis yet, and their blood samples were evaluated at last return visit. The levels of D-dimer, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) between two patient groups were compared. The agreement between D-dimer and CEA (or LDH) was examined. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of D-dimer, CEA, LDH, and their combination in detection of distant organ metastasis.
Results: The level of D-dimer in CRC patients with metachronous metastasis was higher than that in non-metastasis patients (P<0.0001). Agreement between D-dimer and CEA was fair (κ=0.416, P<0.0001). D-dimer had a larger area under ROC (AUC) (0.85) compared to CEA (0.72) or LDH (0.68). The specificity of D-dimer (73.3%) was lower than that of CEA (74.4%), but the sensitivity (88.0%) of D-dimer assay was superior to that of CEA assay (65.2%). LDH showed the lowest sensitivity (42.4%) and highest specificity (95.3%) among the three biomarkers. The sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of a combination assay (either D-dimer elevation or CEA elevation) were 94.6% and 91.1%, respectively, and the specificity and positive predictive value of another combination assay (both D-dimer elevation and LDH elevation) were 97.7% and 94.9%, respectively. Parallel test of the three markers improved the sensitivity and NPV to 95.7% and 92.7%, respectively.
Conclusion: Combining with CEA and/or LDH, D-dimer could be a useful surveillance marker for distant organ metastasis in CRC patients after curative resection.
Keywords: D-dimer, colorectal cancer, curative resection, distant organ metastasis, CEA
Corrigendum for this article has been published
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]