Back to Journals » Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity » Volume 15

Use of Contrave, Naltrexone with Bupropion, Bupropion, or Naltrexone and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Literature Review

Authors Dahlberg S, Chang ET, Weiss SR, Dopart P, Gould E , Ritchey ME

Received 20 July 2022

Accepted for publication 16 September 2022

Published 29 September 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 3049—3067

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S381652

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Juei-Tang Cheng



Sarah Dahlberg,1 Ellen T Chang,1 Sheila R Weiss,1 Pamela Dopart,1 Errol Gould,2 Mary E Ritchey3

1Exponent, Inc, Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA; 2Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC., Brentwood, TN, 37027, USA; 3Med Tech Epi, LLC., Philadelphia, PA, 19147, USA

Correspondence: Errol Gould, Currax Pharmaceuticals LLC, 155 Franklin Road, Suite 450, Brentwood, TN, 37027, USA, Email [email protected]

Abstract: Naltrexone/Bupropion extended release (ER; Contrave) is an extended-release, fixed-dose combination medication of naltrexone (8 mg) and bupropion (90 mg) for patients with obesity or overweight with at least one weight-related comorbidity. Obese and overweight patients with or without comorbidities are at increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. Due to the increased CV risk profile in this patient population, this systematic literature review was conducted to assess human studies reporting major adverse CV events (MACE) and other CV events. A priori eligibility criteria included clinical studies (randomized and observational) published from January 1, 2012, to September 30, 2021, with data comparing users of naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, bupropion without naltrexone, or naltrexone without bupropion versus comparator groups (placebo or other treatments), and with sufficient information to determine the frequency of MACE or other CV adverse events by treatment group. Among 2539 English-language articles identified, 70 articles met the eligibility criteria: seven studies of naltrexone/bupropion ER or naltrexone with bupropion, 32 studies of bupropion, and 31 studies of naltrexone. No studies reported an increased risk of MACE among users of naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, or bupropion or naltrexone individually compared with nonusers. One-half of the available studies (n = 35) reported no (zero) CV events and the other half (n = 35) reported that a non-zero frequency of CV events occurred. Four studies reported data on MACE, including three studies of bupropion and one study of naltrexone/bupropion ER. For composite MACE and its components, the difference in proportions between naltrexone/bupropion ER-, bupropion-, or naltrexone-treated patients compared with active comparators or placebo-treated patients did not exceed 2.5%. In conclusion, the available human evidence does not indicate an increased risk of CV events or MACE following use of naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, or the individual components.

Keywords: MACE, obese, overweight, cardiovascular risk

Introduction

The prevalence of adults who are overweight or obese has increased steadily over recent decades; currently, nearly 40% of US adults are classified as overweight and an additional 40% are classified as obese, including 10% classified as severely obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥40 kg/m2).1–3 Globally, the World Health Organization estimates that approximately 39% of adults worldwide are overweight, including 13% who are obese. These figures represent a tripling of the global prevalence of obesity since the 1970s.4

Overweight and obese patients are at an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and CV-related mortality.5–7 The importance of overweight/obesity as a determinant of CVD has been demonstrated in several large and well-established cohort studies, including the Framingham Heart Study and the Nurses’ Health Study, in which overweight/obesity remained independently associated with increased CVD risk even after adjustment for other known CVD risk factors.8–11 Obesity has also been shown to directly increase the risk of developing CV risk factors, including hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hypercholesterolemia. As overweight and obesity have a substantial impact on overall CV health, effective weight loss interventions are critical for the prevention of CVD. Pharmacologic agents are an important treatment strategy for weight reduction. There is a desire to better understand the CV safety of currently prescribed medications intended to manage obesity.12,13

Naltrexone/Bupropion extended release (ER; Contrave) is an extended-release, fixed-dose combination medication of naltrexone (8 mg) and bupropion (90 mg). Naltrexone/bupropion ER is indicated as an adjunct to increased physical activity and a reduced-calorie diet for chronic weight management in obese adults or overweight adults with at least one weight-related comorbidity such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, or dyslipidemia.14 Naltrexone and bupropion as stand-alone products are not approved for weight management but are approved for other indications. Naltrexone is an opioid antagonist used to treat alcohol and opioid addiction and bupropion is an aminoketone antidepressant used to treat major depressive disorder and seasonable affective disorder, and as an aid to smoking cessation treatment. Naltrexone/bupropion ER was first approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2014 and is currently the only approved oral fixed-dose combination.

In this increased CV risk patient population, this systematic literature review was conducted to obtain information from clinical trials and observational studies of CV events in adult patients across all indications treated with naltrexone/bupropion ER or naltrexone with bupropion, or either of the components, bupropion and naltrexone. While the primary focus of this literature review was to evaluate incidence of MACE in naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, bupropion, or naltrexone users versus comparator groups (placebo or other active treatments besides naltrexone and bupropion), other CV events were also assessed to more fully delineate and determine the CV risk profile by treatment group.

Material and Methods

Search Strategy and Selection Criteria

The review was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the pre-specified protocol is provided in the Supplemental Material Original Study Protocol and Table 1.15 While the New Drug Application (NDA) for naltrexone/bupropion ER was first submitted to the FDA in 2010, the CV safety profile of one ingredient of naltrexone/bupropion ER, bupropion, was established prior to the NDA submission. Hence, we queried PubMed for all publicly available, English-language primary literature published on or after January 1, 2012, until September 30, 2021. Briefly, the inclusion criteria specified that articles were required to be published, peer-reviewed, human observational studies or clinical trials presenting original data where the intervention was naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, or the individual components bupropion or naltrexone, and results were also presented for a comparator group (placebo, other active comparator that was not naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, bupropion, or naltrexone). The outcome of interest was any clinically diagnosed CV event, with a focus on three-point MACE (ie, CV death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) and its components. Other reported CV events were also extracted. Laboratory values (eg, electrocardiogram readings, cholesterol level, and blood pressure) and symptoms (eg, chest discomfort) were excluded, whereas clinical diagnoses such as hypercholesterolemia and hypertension were included. Review articles and meta-analyses were not eligible for inclusion, because they did not report original research results. However, cited articles in recently published review articles and meta-analyses were examined to identify any additional non-duplicate relevant studies. When multiple publications were based on the same at-risk population, the study reporting the largest patient population was used to inform total patient counts.

Data Extraction

All titles and abstracts were screened by one reviewer (EC). Subsequently, all articles eligible for full-text screening were reviewed by one of eight independent reviewers (AK, BD, CK, EC, MA, NO, RL, SD) trained on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data from each eligible article were extracted by one of the reviewers and checked for accuracy by a second reviewer. Any conflicts were resolved by another reviewer (ETC, SRW).

For studies that reported at least one CV event, data abstraction of study descriptors, patient descriptors, treatment descriptors, adverse event descriptors, and adverse event results was conducted. A full listing of the data abstraction fields can be found in the Supplementary Material. For studies that reported “no adverse events”, “no serious adverse events”, or “no deaths”, or where it could otherwise be clearly inferred that no CV events occurred, data extraction was limited to the study population assessed for safety.

Statistical Analysis

Where studies did not report effect measures (eg, relative risks or risk differences) comparing the proportion of CV adverse events between treatment groups, we calculated Fisher’s exact p-values to compare crude proportions.

Results

A total of 2552 unique articles were screened for inclusion and 70 studies met the inclusion criteria. [Figure 1, PRISMA diagram]

Figure 1 PRISMA flow diagram detailing study selection, inclusion and exclusion. *Bibliographies of all review articles published in 2021 and a subset of earlier reviews selected based on titles and abstracts were screened for additional relevant articles.

Note: Adapted from Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.15

Of the 70 included studies, 35 studies enrolling a total of 6393 patients reported zero CV events (Table 1).16–50 (This total includes studies that reported zero occurrences of certain specified CV events, for example, serious CV adverse events or CV deaths, without reporting whether or not other CV events occurred.) The remaining 35 studies, enrolling a combined total of 3,133,156 patients, each reported at least one CV event (not restricted to MACE).51–85 Four studies reported data on MACE, enrolling a combined total of 26,195 patients.

Table 1 Breakdown of Publications Identified by Treatment of Interest

Seven studies, all of which were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), evaluated naltrexone/bupropion ER or naltrexone with bupropion as the intervention (Table 2).53,65,66,76,78,84,85 Naltrexone-bupropion studies are considered naltrexone/bupropion ER studies if the treatment is naltrexone (32 mg/day) + bupropion (360mg/day). Only one reported on MACE (Nissen et al 2016) (Table 3).78

Table 2 Breakdown of Studies Reporting CV Events According to Study Design

Table 3 Studies Reporting on MACE and MACE+

Nissen et al was an RCT (NCT01601704) evaluating CVD risk in overweight or obese patients treated with naltrexone/bupropion ER or placebo across 266 US centers.

At the final end of the study analysis, with a median follow-up of 121 weeks in both groups, the proportion of MACE events in the naltrexone/bupropion ER-treated population was slightly less than in the placebo-treated population at 2.7% and 2.8%, respectively, yielding an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.95 (99.7% confidence interval [CI]: 0.65–1.38) for naltrexone/bupropion ER vs placebo. For MACE plus hospitalization for unstable angina (“MACE+”), the proportion remained slightly lower for naltrexone/bupropion ER than placebo at 3.7% vs 3.8% (hazard ratio = 0.95, 99.7% CI: 0.69–1.31). After accruing one quarter of the expected MACE events (25% interim), the frequency of MACE among patients in the naltrexone/bupropion ER arm was significantly lower than in the placebo arm. After accruing half of the expected events (50% interim) and at the final end of the study analysis, there was not a statistically significant difference in MACE between the naltrexone/bupropion ER and placebo groups.78 No elevated risk of MACE – including MACE, MACE+, and the individual components of MACE – was observed in the naltrexone/bupropion ER-treated group compared with placebo at the 25% interim analysis, the 50% interim analysis, or the end of the study (Table 3).

Literature on the constituent active ingredients (bupropion and naltrexone) was used to further inform the CV safety profile of naltrexone/bupropion ER. Among the 28 eligible studies that reported at least one CV event, 19 studies evaluated bupropion and 9 evaluated naltrexone (Table 2). Most of the bupropion studies were observational in design (N = 11 of 19), whereas most of the naltrexone studies were RCTs (N = 7 of 9). The studies reporting on MACE are described further below.

Mace

Three bupropion studies, summarized alongside Nissen et al in Table 3, reported on the occurrence of MACE. No studies of naltrexone provided data on MACE. Across the three bupropion studies, the proportion of patients with MACE was similar between bupropion comparator (active comparators or placebo) groups. In particular, the observed proportion of MACE was <0.5% in all treatment groups after at least 6 weeks of follow-up in a pooled analysis of RCTs (Kittle et al 2017) and after 52 weeks of follow-up in a single RCT of bupropion for smoking cessation (Benowitz et al 2018, NCT01574703). MACE occurred in 11–13% of patients after 12 months of follow-up in a third RCT that evaluated bupropion in a high-risk population of smokers who were enrolled at the time of hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, which is a component of three-point MACE (Eisenberg et al 2013, NCT00689611).54,62,69

Mace+

As shown in Table 3, three bupropion studies evaluated MACE+, defined in various ways as composite MACE plus at least one other CV endpoint. No studies of naltrexone reported on the frequency of MACE+. Two of the bupropion publications with data on MACE+ had also reporting on MACE (Kittle et al 2017; Benowitz et al 2018), and the third was an observational cohort study of bupropion compared with varenicline or nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation after 1 year of follow-up (Eberg et al 2019).54,61,69 All three of these studies reported proportions of MACE+ <1% across all treatment groups. The proportion of MACE+ differed by <0.4% between those treated with bupropion and those treated with active comparators or placebo in all studies.

Components of MACE

Cardiovascular Death

Ten studies, including one study of naltrexone/bupropion ER, five studies of bupropion (n = 5 RCTs), and four studies of naltrexone (n = 3 RCTs), reported data on CV death (Table 4). The length of follow-up across the 10 studies varied from 6 weeks to 4.9 years. The frequency of CV death was <1% and the incidence rate, where reported, was <1 per 1000 person-years, except in an RCT of bupropion for high-risk patients initially hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction (Eisenberg et al 2013). In that high-risk study population, CV death occurred in 4.7% (9/192) of those with bupropion and 3.0% (6/200) of those with placebo (Fisher’s exact p = 0.44).62 None of the ten studies reported a difference of 2.0% or more in CV death between treatment groups.

Table 4 Studies Reporting on Cardiovascular Death

Myocardial Infarction

Nine studies reported on the incidence of myocardial infarction, including two naltrexone/bupropion ER studies (n = 2 RCTs), six bupropion studies (n = 3 RCTs), and one naltrexone study (n = 1 RCT) (Table 5). The length of follow-up among these nine studies ranged from 6 weeks to 14 years. Acute myocardial infarction occurred in <3% of all treatment groups across studies that reported this information (excluding two bupropion studies that did not report the proportion of acute myocardial infarction), and the proportion was comparable between the treatment of interest (ie, naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, bupropion, or naltrexone) and comparator groups. None of the nine studies found a difference of more than 2.5% in the occurrence of myocardial infarction between treatment groups, and relative risks were close to the null in the four studies that reported effect measures.

Table 5 Studies Reporting on Myocardial Infarction

Stroke

Ten studies, including one of naltrexone/bupropion ER (n = 1 RCT) and nine of bupropion (n = 2 RCTs), reported on the incidence of stroke or cerebral infarction (Table 6). No studies of naltrexone reported data for stroke. The length of follow-up, across these 10 studies, ranged from 6 weeks to 128 weeks. The proportion of stroke was ≤1% in all treatment groups (two studies did not report proportions), and incidence rates were <5 per 1000 person-years (reported in two studies), except in the nicotine replacement therapy group in two studies (Carney et al 2020, Kotz et al 2015). In both of the latter studies, the incidence rate of cerebral infarction was significantly lower in the bupropion group than the nicotine replacement therapy group [Carney et al 2020 rate ratio (95% CI) = 0.78, 95% CI: 0.64–0.96; Kotz et al 2015 adjusted hazard ratio (95% CI) = 0.55 (0.35–0.89)].56,70 Across the remaining eight studies, the proportion of stroke differed by <0.6% between patients treated with naltrexone/bupropion ER or bupropion vs those treated with active comparators or placebo.

Table 6 Studies Reporting on Stroke

Except for a statistically significantly lower proportion of cerebral infarction in the bupropion group than the nicotine replacement group in one study (Carney et al 2020), no statistically significant Fisher’s exact p-values were found when comparing the proportion of MACE or its components between naltrexone/bupropion ER or its components vs comparators (Tables 3–6).

Other Non-MACE Cardiovascular Adverse Events

Besides MACE and its components, 23 other types of CV events were described in the 35 studies of naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, bupropion, or naltrexone with non-zero data. These results are summarized in Supplemental Tables 13 Several of these CV event types were reported in a single study each; for instance, only Trivedi et al reported acute cardiac failure, hematoma, hypertensive crisis, hypotension, thrombophlebitis, and vascular disorders.84 The frequencies of the non-MACE CV events were generally similar between treatment and comparator groups, with values ranging from 0% to 15%, depending on the type of CV event and the characteristics of the study population. Where reported (n = 7 studies), relative risks comparing the frequency of non-MACE CV events between treatment groups were close to the null value of 1.0. With the exception of one study, none reported statistically significant differences. In that one study, Carney et al 2020 reported significantly lower incidence rates of the following CV events in the bupropion-treated group than the nicotine replacement therapy group: peripheral vascular disease [adjusted incidence rate ratio (IRR) (95% CI): 0.65 (0.57–0.74)], heart failure [adjusted IRR (95% CI): 0.84 (0.74–0.96)], and ischemic heart disease [adjusted IRR (95% CI): 0.79 (0.69–0.91)].56 No statistically significant Fisher’s exact p-values were found for the following non-MACE CV events when comparing the proportion of non-MACE CV events between naltrexone/bupropion ER or its components vs comparators (Supplemental Tables 13): acute cardiac failure, cardiac disorders, coronary artery disease, hematoma, hypertensive crisis, hypotension, orthostatic hypotension, thrombophlebitis, thrombophlebitis superficial, vascular disorders, heart failure, hospitalization for congestive heart failure, serious cardiac arrhythmia, arrhythmia, hospitalization for atrial fibrillation, serious hypertensive adverse event, death from cardiopulmonary arrest, deep vein thrombosis and serious cardiomyopathy.

In total, we found eight studies with statistically significant Fisher’s exact p-values when comparing the proportion of non-MACE CV events between naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion or the components vs comparators. The use of naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone-bupropion, or the components were associated with a significantly lower incidence of angina, composite cardiovascular events, peripheral vascular disease, and ischemic heart disease. For the remaining non-MACE CV events which were hypertension and tachycardia or palpitations, the use of naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, or the components were associated with a significantly higher incidence compared to active comparators or placebo. For the outcome hypertension, one naltrexone/bupropion ER study (Hollander et al, 2013) evaluated naltrexone (32 mg/day)/bupropion (360mg/day) treated individuals against placebo treated individuals. In both groups, the proportion of individuals experiencing hypertension was under 10%. There was one naltrexone/bupropion ER (Nissen et al, 2016), one bupropion (Sheridan et al, 2018), and one naltrexone study (Spencer et al 2018a) which had a significantly higher incidence of tachycardia or palpitations in the treatment group compared to active comparators or placebo.

Discussion

Overweight and obese patients are at an increased risk of CVD and CV-related mortality.5–7 Due to the increased cardiovascular risk profile in this patient population, this systematic literature review was conducted to assess human studies reporting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and other CV events. In particular, we sought to determine whether the types and proportions of CV events, especially MACE, differed between naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, bupropion, or naltrexone and placebo or active comparators. The overall body of literature and individual studies therein do not demonstrate an increased risk of MACE or other CV events with the use of naltrexone/bupropion ER or its individual components, bupropion and naltrexone. We identified one study of naltrexone/bupropion ER that reported specifically on MACE (Nissen et al 2016). In this RCT, there was no statistically significant increase in the incidence of MACE, MACE+, or the components of MACE between overweight/obese patients treated with naltrexone/bupropion ER and those treated with placebo.12 Overall, the published literature provided no consistent or statistically significant evidence of increased risk of CV events with use of naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, or the components. One half of the 70 studies included in this review reported no CV events in patients treated with naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone-bupropion, or the components, or a comparison treatment, while the remainder reported no increase in the incidence of MACE or MACE+ events in patients treated with naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, bupropion, or naltrexone.

The risk of CV events in each study was dependent on the study population, especially comorbidities and indication for treatment. Observation of CV events also depended on duration of follow-up, sample size (such that rare events were unlikely to be observed in smaller studies), and, potentially, comparator treatment type (placebo or active comparator). The underlying patient populations in studies of naltrexone/bupropion ER, naltrexone with bupropion, bupropion, and/or naltrexone are at increased CV risk compared with the general population due to patient comorbidities, which include obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and smoking.5–7 These conditions are known risk factors for MACE and other CVD. Despite the increased risk of CV events in these study populations, half of studies herein reported an absence of CV events, and none reported an elevated risk for CV events in patients treated with naltrexone/bupropion ER or its components.86

The limitations to the studies evaluated in this review are considered in our overall conclusion. The diversity of study designs, lengths of follow-up, indications, and methods of defining, ascertaining, and reporting CV events, as well as overlapping study populations across some articles, a summary incidence of MACE or other CV events among all combined studies preclude a numeric calculation.

The included observational studies incorporated techniques that did not adjust for confounding by indication – that is, biased comparisons from differences in CVD risk due to the underlying indication for treatment, such as overweight/obesity, type 2 diabetes, or smoking. Selection bias in observational studies may contribute to observed differences (or lack thereof) in CVD risk if participation rates and reasons for non-participation vary between treatment groups. It is understood that this patient population is at increased CV risk.5–7

Few of the eligible studies included herein specifically evaluated naltrexone/bupropion ER or naltrexone with bupropion as the intervention of interest, and only one study reported on MACE with naltrexone/bupropion ER, and after accruing half of the expected events (50% interim) and at the final end of the study analysis, there was not a statistically significant difference in MACE between the naltrexone/bupropion ER and placebo groups.78 There was no elevated risk of MACE – including MACE, MACE+, and the individual components of MACE – observed in the naltrexone/bupropion ER-treated group compared with placebo. Studies of bupropion or naltrexone generally had shorter durations of follow-up than studies of naltrexone/bupropion ER or naltrexone with bupropion, impacting their contribution to the body of evidence on the long-term CV safety of naltrexone/bupropion ER. Our findings are consistent with existing systematic reviews regarding the same interventions and outcome. Sposito et al conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of Phase 3 RCTs evaluating bupropion, naltrexone, or naltrexone with bupropion, and found no significant difference in the incidence of MACE between treatment groups.87

Finally, only published articles identified in accordance with the literature search protocol were included in this review. Despite extensive efforts to identify all relevant sources available through a pre-defined search strategy, with input from experts in both the product literature and systematic literature reviews, some sources with relevant information may have been overlooked or not identified for inclusion.

Conclusion

Based on 22 RCTs supplemented by 13 observational studies with relevant data, the overall body of literature and individual studies herein do not demonstrate an increased risk of MACE or other CV events with the use of naltrexone/bupropion ER or its individual components, bupropion and naltrexone.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the following individuals for their assistance with data abstraction and quality control: Ms. Maribeth Anderson, Dr. Benjamin Davis, Dr. Anam Khan, Dr. Anais Kahve, Ms. Callan Krevanko, Dr. Ryan Lewis, Dr. Jowanna Malone, and Dr. Nnaemeka Odo. Additionally, we would like to thank Ms. Hope Mueller and Dr. Michael Kyle for their review of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by a research contract between Currax Pharmaceuticals, LLC, and Exponent, Inc., that provided Exponent with the right to publish findings of all research projects commissioned.

Disclosure

SD, ETC, SRW, PD are employees and ETC and SRW are stockholders of Exponent, a multidisciplinary science and engineering consultancy. MER is a consultant and EG is an employee of Currax Pharmaceuticals, LLC, a specialty pharmaceutical business focused on acquiring and commercializing prescription drugs within the US market. Currax Pharmaceuticals owns the world-wide rights to Contrave. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Flegal KM. Prevalence and trends in obesity among US adults, 1999–2000. JAMA. 2002;288(14):1723–1727. doi:10.1001/jama.288.14.1723

2. Hales CM, Carroll MD, Fryar CD, Ogden CL. Prevalence of obesity among adults and youth: United States, 2017–2018. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db360-h.pdf. Accessed September 21, 2022.

3. Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Afful J. Prevalence of Overweight, Obesity, and Severe Obesity Among Adults Aged 20 and Over: United States, 1960–1962 Through 2017–2018. NCHS Health E-Stats; 2020.

4. World Health Organization. Obesity and overweight; 2021. Avialable from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight. Accessed September 21, 2022.

5. Whitlock G, Lewington S, Sherliker P, et al.; Prospective Studies Collaboration. Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900 000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet. 2009;373(9669):1083–1096.

6. Bhaskaran K, Dos-Santos-Silva I, Leon DA, Douglas IJ, Smeeth L. Association of BMI with overall and cause-specific mortality: a population-based cohort study of 3·6 million adults in the UK. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(12):944–953.

7. Powell-Wiley TM, Poirier P, Burke LE, et al. Obesity and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021;143(21):e984–e1010.

8. Rashid MN, Fuentes F, Touchon RC, Wehner PS. Obesity and the risk for cardiovascular disease. Prev Cardiol. 2003;6(1):42–47. PMID: 12624562. doi:10.1111/j.1520-037x.2003.01358.x

9. Manson JE, Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, et al. A prospective study of obesity and risk of coronary heart disease in women. N Engl J Med. 1990;322(13):882–889. doi:10.1056/NEJM199003293221303

10. Hubert HB, Feinleib M, McNamara PM, Castelli WP. Obesity as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease: a 26-year follow-up of participants in the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 1983;67(5):968–977. doi:10.1161/01.cir.67.5.968

11. Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Sullivan L, Parise H, Kannel WB. Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk: the Framingham experience. Arch Intern Med. 2002;162(16):1867–1872. PMID: 12196085. doi:10.1001/archinte.162.16.1867

12. James WP, Caterson ID, Coutinho W, et al.; SCOUT Investigators. Effect of sibutramine on cardiovascular outcomes in overweight and obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(10):905–917.

13. Connolly HM, Crary JL, McGoon MD, et al. Valvular heart disease associated with fenfluramine-phentermine. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(9):581–588.

14. Contrave (naltrexone hydrochloride and bupropion hydrochloride) extended-release tablets. Prescribing information; 2021. Available from: https://contrave.com/contrave-pi/. Accessed September 21, 2022.

15. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. PMID: 33782057; PMCID: PMC8005924. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71

16. Afshari R, Khadem-Rezaiyan M, Khatibi Moghadam H, Talebi M. Very low dose naltrexone in opioid detoxification: a double-blind, randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. Toxicol Res. 2019;36(1):21–27. PMID: 32042711; PMCID: PMC6990297. doi:10.1007/s43188-019-00008-2

17. Aghabiklooei A, Hassanian-Moghaddam H, Zamani N, et al. Effectiveness of naltrexone in the prevention of delayed respiratory arrest in opioid-naive methadone-intoxicated patients. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:903172. PMID: 24089691; PMCID: PMC3781921. doi:10.1155/2013/903172

18. Ahmadi J, Sahraian A, Biuseh M. A randomized clinical trial on the effects of bupropion and buprenorphine on the reduction of methamphetamine craving. Trials. 2019;20(1):468. PMID: 31362784; PMCID: PMC6668115. doi:10.1186/s13063-019-3554-6

19. Caponnetto P, DiPiazza J, Cappello GC, Demma S, Maglia M, Polosa R. Multimodal smoking cessation in a real-life setting: combining motivational interviewing with official therapy and reduced risk products. Tob Use Insights. 2019;12:1179173X19878435. PMID: 31636483; PMCID: PMC6783661. doi:10.1177/1179173X19878435

20. Chevassus H, Farret A, Gagnol JP, et al. Psychological and physiological effects of bupropion compared to methylphenidate after prolonged administration in healthy volunteers (NCT00285155). Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2013;69(4):779–787. PMID: 23052417. doi:10.1007/s00228-012-1418-z.

21. Cox LS, Nollen NL, Mayo MS, et al. Bupropion for smoking cessation in African American light smokers: a randomized controlled trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2012;104(4):290–298. PMID: 22282543; PMCID: PMC3283533. doi:10.1093/jnci/djr513

22. Darpo B, Zhou M, Bai SA, Ferber G, Xiang Q, Finn A. Differentiating the effect of an opioid agonist on cardiac repolarization from μ-receptor-mediated, indirect effects on the qt interval: a randomized, 3-way crossover study in healthy subjects. Clin Ther. 2016;38(2):315–326. PMID: 26749217. doi:10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.12.004

23. Gelderblom H, Wüstenberg T, McLean T, et al. Bupropion for the treatment of apathy in Huntington’s disease: a multicenter, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective crossover trial. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173872. PMID: 28323838; PMCID: PMC5360242. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173872

24. Gonzales P, Grieco A, White E, et al. Safety of oral naltrexone in HIV-positive men who have sex with men and transgender women with alcohol use disorder and initiating antiretroviral therapy. PLoS One. 2020;15(3):e0228433. PMID: 32134956; PMCID: PMC7058313. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0228433

25. Gray KM, Carpenter MJ, Lewis AL, Klintworth EM, Upadhyaya HP. Varenicline versus bupropion XL for smoking cessation in older adolescents: a randomized, double-blind pilot trial. Nicotine Tob Res. 2012;14(2):234–239. PMID: 21778151; PMCID: PMC3265741. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntr130

26. Gulrez G, Badyal DK, Deswal RS, Sharma A. Bupropion as an augmenting agent in patients of depression with partial response. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;110(3):227–230. PMID: 21895979. doi:10.1111/j.1742-7843.2011.00788.x

27. Heinzerling KG, Gadzhyan J, van Oudheusden H, Rodriguez F, McCracken J, Shoptaw S. Pilot randomized trial of bupropion for adolescent methamphetamine abuse/dependence. J Adolesc Health. 2013;52(4):502–505. PMID: 23333007; PMCID: PMC3608805. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.10.275

28. King AC, Cao D, O’Malley SS, et al. Effects of naltrexone on smoking cessation outcomes and weight gain in nicotine-dependent men and women. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012;32(5):630–636. PMID: 22926596; PMCID: PMC4640209. doi:10.1097/JCP.0b013e3182676956

29. Korthuis PT, Lum PJ, Vergara-Rodriguez P, et al.; CTN-0055 CHOICES Investigators. Feasibility and safety of extended-release naltrexone treatment of opioid and alcohol use disorder in HIV clinics: a pilot/feasibility randomized trial. Addiction. 2017;112(6):1036–1044. PMID: 28061017; PMCID: PMC5408318. doi:10.1111/add.13753

30. Krupitsky E, Zvartau E, Blokhina E, et al. Randomized trial of long-acting sustained-release naltrexone implant vs oral naltrexone or placebo for preventing relapse to opioid dependence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(9):973–981. PMID: 22945623; PMCID: PMC3614358. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.1a

31. Lee JD, McDonald R, Grossman E, et al. Opioid treatment at release from jail using extended-release naltrexone: a pilot proof-of-concept randomized effectiveness trial. Addiction. 2015;110(6):1008–1014. PMID: 25703440. doi:10.1111/add.12894

32. Ling W, Hillhouse MP, Saxon AJ, et al. Buprenorphine + naloxone plus naltrexone for the treatment of cocaine dependence: the Cocaine Use Reduction with Buprenorphine (CURB) study. Addiction. 2016;111(8):1416–1427. PMID: 26948856; PMCID: PMC4940267. doi:10.1111/add.13375

33. Mitchell SG, Monico LB, Gryczynski J, Fishman MJ, O’Grady KE, Schwartz RP. Extended-release naltrexone for youth with opioid use disorder. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021;130:108407. PMID: 34118699; PMCID: PMC8478707. doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108407

34. Nasr S, Wendt B, Popli A, Crayton J. Comparing outcomes of adjunctive treatment in depression: aripiprazole versus bupropion. J Affect Disord. 2014;162:50–54. PMID: 24767005. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2014.03.019

35. O’Malley SS, Corbin WR, Leeman RF, et al. Reduction of alcohol drinking in young adults by naltrexone: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety. J Clin Psychiatry. 2015;76(2):e207–13. PMID: 25742208; PMCID: PMC4442987. doi:10.4088/JCP.13m08934

36. Oslin DW, Leong SH, Lynch KG, et al. Naltrexone vs placebo for the treatment of alcohol dependence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72(5):430–437. PMID: 25760804.10.4088/JCP.13m08934. PMID: 25742208; PMCID: PMC4442987. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2014.3053

37. Pathak S, Vince B, Kelsh D, et al. Abuse potential of samidorphan: a Phase I, oxycodone-, pentazocine-, naltrexone-, and placebo-controlled study. J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;59(2):218–228. PMID: 30476361. doi:10.1002/jcph.1343

38. Ray LA, Bujarski S, Courtney KE, et al. The effects of naltrexone on subjective response to methamphetamine in a clinical sample: a double-blind, placebo-controlled laboratory study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2015;40(10):2347–2356. PMID: 25801501; PMCID: PMC4538349. doi:10.1038/npp.2015.83

39. Salehifar E, Azimi S, Janbabai G, et al. Efficacy and safety of bupropion in cancer-related fatigue, a randomized double blind placebo controlled clinical trial. BMC Cancer. 2020;20(1):158. PMID: 32106832; PMCID: PMC7045731. doi:10.1186/s12885-020-6618-9

40. Santos GM, Coffin P, Santos D, et al. Feasibility, acceptability, and tolerability of targeted naltrexone for nondependent methamphetamine-using and binge-drinking men who have sex with men. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2016;72:21–30. PMID: 26674372; PMCID: PMC4837026. doi:10.1097/QAI.0000000000000922

41. Schmahl C, Kleindienst N, Limberger M, et al. Evaluation of naltrexone for dissociative symptoms in borderline personality disorder. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012;27(1):61–68. PMID: 22002175. doi:10.1097/YIC.0b013e32834d0e50

42. Siddiqi K, Khan A, Ahmad M, et al. Action to stop smoking in suspected tuberculosis (ASSIST) in Pakistan: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(9):667–675. PMID: 23648948. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-9-201305070-00006

43. Smith JP, Field D, Bingaman SI, Evans R, Mauger DT. Safety and tolerability of low-dose naltrexone therapy in children with moderate to severe Crohn’s disease: a pilot study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(4):339–345. PMID: 23188075; PMCID: PMC3586944. doi:10.1097/MCG.0b013e3182702f2b

44. Spencer TJ, Bhide P, Zhu J, et al. The mixed opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone mitigates stimulant-induced euphoria: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of naltrexone. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018b;79(2):17m11609. PMID: 29617066; PMCID: PMC6548180. doi:10.4088/JCP.17m11609

45. Tanum L, Solli KK, Latif ZE, et al. Effectiveness of injectable extended-release naltrexone vs daily buprenorphine-naloxone for opioid dependence: a randomized clinical noninferiority trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(12):1197–1205. PMID: 29049469; PMCID: PMC6583381. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3206

46. Taveira TH, Wu WC, Tschibelu E, et al. The effect of naltrexone on body fat mass in olanzapine-treated schizophrenic or schizoaffective patients: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. J Psychopharmacol. 2014;28(4):395–400. PMID: 24218048. doi:10.1177/0269881113509904

47. Tiihonen J, Krupitsky E, Verbitskaya E, et al. Naltrexone implant for the treatment of polydrug dependence: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2012;169(5):531–536. PMID: 22764364. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11071121

48. White MA, Grilo CM. Bupropion for overweight women with binge-eating disorder: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2013;74(4):400–406. PMID: 23656848; PMCID: PMC4021866. doi:10.4088/JCP.12m08071

49. Xuyi W, Juelu W, Xiaojun X, et al. Phase I study of injectable, depot naltrexone for the relapse prevention treatment of opioid dependence. Am J Addict. 2014;23(2):162–169. PMID: 24107112. doi:10.1111/j.1521-0391.2013.12085.x

50. Yee A, Loh HS, Ong TA, Ng CG, Sulaiman AH; Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group. Placebo-controlled trial of bupropion as treatment for methadone-emergent sexual dysfunction in men. Am J Mens Health. 2018;12(5):1705–1718. PMID: 29973132; PMCID: PMC6142124. doi:10.1177/1557988318784152

51. Adhikari S, Tulachan P, Ojha SP, Chapagai M, Dhungana S, Pant SB. Comparison of disulfiram and naltrexone in cases of alcohol dependence syndrome. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020;18(1):75–81. PMID: 32335597. doi:10.33314/jnhrc.v18i1.1921

52. Anthenelli RM, Benowitz NL, West R, et al. Neuropsychiatric safety and efficacy of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers with and without psychiatric disorders (EAGLES): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10037):2507–2520. PMID: 27116918. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30272-0

53. Apovian CM, Aronne L, Rubino D, et al.; COR-II Study Group. A randomized, phase 3 trial of naltrexone SR/bupropion SR on weight and obesity-related risk factors (COR-II). Obesity. 2013;21(5):935–943. PMID: 23408728; PMCID: PMC3739931. doi:10.1002/oby.20309

54. Benowitz NL, Pipe A, West R, et al. Cardiovascular safety of varenicline, bupropion, and nicotine patch in smokers: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(5):622–631. PMID: 29630702; PMCID: PMC6145797. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0397

55. Bisaga A, Mannelli P, Yu M, et al. Outpatient transition to extended-release injectable naltrexone for patients with opioid use disorder: a phase 3 randomized trial. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;187:171–178. PMID: 29674251. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.02.023

56. Carney G, Bassett K, Maclure M, Taylor S, Dormuth CR. Cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric safety of smoking cessation pharmacotherapies in non-depressed adults: a retrospective cohort study. Addiction. 2020;115(8):1534–1546. PMID: 32077187. doi:10.1111/add.14951

57. Carney G, Maclure M, Malfair S, Bassett K, Wright JM, Dormuth CR. Comparative safety of smoking cessation pharmacotherapies during a government-sponsored reimbursement program. Nicotine Tob Res. 2021;23(2):302–309. PMID: 32484873. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntaa100

58. Chen AC, Huang KL, Chen HM, Chen PC, Chen VC, Chiu WC. Antidepressants and the risk of myocardial infarction among patients with diabetes: a population-based cohort study. J Affect Disord. 2021;294:109–114. PMID: 34274786. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.078

59. Cheon EJ, Lee KH, Park YW, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of aripiprazole versus bupropion augmentation in patients with major depressive disorder unresponsive to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors: a randomized, prospective, open-label study. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2017;37(2):193–199. PMID: 28129308. doi:10.1097/JCP.0000000000000663

60. Cinciripini PM, Robinson JD, Karam-Hage M, et al. Effects of varenicline and bupropion sustained-release use plus intensive smoking cessation counseling on prolonged abstinence from smoking and on depression, negative affect, and other symptoms of nicotine withdrawal. JAMA Psychiatry. 2013;70(5):522–533. PMID: 23536105; PMCID: PMC4128024. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.678

61. Eberg M, Platt RW, Reynier P, Filion KB. Estimation of high-dimensional propensity scores with multiple exposure levels. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29(Suppl 1):53–60. PMID: 31571347. doi:10.1002/pds.4890

62. Eisenberg MJ, Grandi SM, Gervais A, et al.; ZESCA Investigators. Bupropion for smoking cessation in patients hospitalized with acute myocardial infarction: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:524–532. PMID: 23369417. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.1030

63. Garbutt JC, Kampov-Polevoy AB, Kalka-Juhl LS, Gallop RJ. Association of the sweet-liking phenotype and craving for alcohol with the response to naltrexone treatment in alcohol dependence: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2016;73(10):1056–1063. PMID: 27627782. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2157

64. Graham DJ, By K, McKean S, et al. Cardiovascular and mortality risks in older Medicare patients treated with varenicline or bupropion for smoking cessation: an observational cohort study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014;23(11):1205–1212. PMID: 25044169. doi:10.1002/pds.3678

65. Halseth A, Shan K, Gilder K, Malone M, Acevedo L, Fujioka K. Quality of life, binge eating and sexual function in participants treated for obesity with sustained release naltrexone/bupropion. Obes Sci Pract. 2018;4(2):141–152. PMID: 29670752; PMCID: PMC5893468. doi:10.1002/osp4.156

66. Hollander P, Gupta AK, Plodkowski R, et al.; COR-Diabetes Study Group. Effects of naltrexone sustained-release/bupropion sustained-release combination therapy on body weight and glycemic parameters in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(12):4022–4029. PMID: 24144653; PMCID: PMC3836105. doi:10.2337/dc13-0234

67. Jafarinia M, Mohammadi MR, Modabbernia A, et al. Bupropion versus methylphenidate in the treatment of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: randomized double-blind study. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2012;27(4):411–418. PMID: 22806822. doi:10.1002/hup.2242

68. Kelty E, Joyce D, Hulse G. A retrospective cohort study of mortality rates in patients with an opioid use disorder treated with implant naltrexone, oral methadone or sublingual buprenorphine. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2019;45(3):285–291. PMID: 30848965. doi:10.1080/00952990.2018.1545131

69. Kittle J, Lopes RD, Huang M, et al. Cardiovascular adverse events in the drug-development program of bupropion for smoking cessation: a systematic retrospective adjudication effort. Clin Cardiol. 2017;40(10):899–906. PMID: 28605035; PMCID: PMC6490529. doi:10.1002/clc.22744

70. Kotz D, Viechtbauer W, Simpson C, van Schayck OC, West R, Sheikh A. Cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric risks of varenicline: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(10):761–768. PMID: 26355008; PMCID: PMC4593936. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00320-3

71. Kotz D, Viechtbauer W, Simpson CR, van Schayck OCP, West R, Sheikh A. Cardiovascular and neuropsychiatric risks of varenicline and bupropion in smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2017;72(10):905–911. PMID: 28473506. doi:10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-210067

72. Krupitsky E, Nunes EV, Ling W, Gastfriend DR, Memisoglu A, Silverman BL. Injectable extended-release naltrexone (XR-NTX) for opioid dependence: long-term safety and effectiveness. Addiction. 2013;108(9):1628–1637. PMID: 23701526. doi:10.1111/add.12208

73. Krupitsky E, Blokhina E, Zvartau E, et al. Slow-release naltrexone implant versus oral naltrexone for improving treatment outcomes in people with HIV who are addicted to opioids: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised trial. Lancet HIV. 2019;6(4):e221–e229. PMID: 30880163; PMCID: PMC6529232. doi:10.1016/S2352-3018(18)30362-X

74. Lee JD, Friedmann PD, Kinlock TW, et al. Extended-release naltrexone to prevent opioid relapse in criminal justice offenders. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(13):1232–1242. PMID: 27028913; PMCID: PMC5454800. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1505409

75. Maier F, Spottke A, Bach JP, et al. Bupropion for the treatment of apathy in alzheimer disease: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(5):e206027. PMID: 32463470; PMCID: PMC7256670. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.6027

76. McIntyre RS, Paron E, Burrows M, et al. Psychiatric safety and weight loss efficacy of naltrexone/bupropion as add-on to antidepressant therapy in patients with obesity or overweight. J Affect Disord. 2021;289:167–176. PMID: 33989969. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.017

77. Monárrez-Espino J, Galanti MR, Hansson J, Janszky I, Söderberg-Löfdal K, Möller J. Treatment with bupropion and varenicline for smoking cessation and the risk of acute cardiovascular events and injuries: a Swedish case-crossover study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2018;20(5):606–613. PMID: 28595356. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntx131

78. Nissen SE, Wolski KE, Prcela L, et al. Effect of naltrexone-bupropion on major adverse cardiovascular events in overweight and obese patients with cardiovascular risk factors: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(10):990–1004. PMID: 26954408. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.1558

79. Schmitz JM, Green CE, Stotts AL, et al. A two-phased screening paradigm for evaluating candidate medications for cocaine cessation or relapse prevention: modafinil, levodopa-carbidopa, naltrexone. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014;136:100–107. PMID: 24424425; PMCID: PMC3944935. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.12.015

80. Sheridan DC, Lin A, Horowitz BZ. Suicidal bupropion ingestions in adolescents: increased morbidity compared with other antidepressants. Clin Toxicol. 2018;56(5):360–364. PMID: 28944696. doi:10.1080/15563650.2017.1377839

81. Spencer TJ, Bhide P, Zhu J, et al. Opiate antagonists do not interfere with the clinical benefits of stimulants in ADHD: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of the mixed opioid receptor antagonist naltrexone. J Clin Psychiatry. 2018a;79(1):16m11012. PMID: 28640990; PMCID: PMC6438372. doi:10.4088/JCP.16m11012

82. Svanström H, Pasternak B, Hviid A. Use of varenicline for smoking cessation and risk of serious cardiovascular events: nationwide cohort study. BMJ. 2012;345:e7176. PMID: 23138033; PMCID: PMC3493624. doi:10.1136/bmj.e7176

83. Toh S, Baker MA, Brown JS, Kornegay C, Platt R; Mini-Sentinel Investigators. Rapid assessment of cardiovascular risk among users of smoking cessation drugs within the US Food and Drug Administration’s Mini-Sentinel program. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(9):817–819. PMID: 23529063. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.3004

84. Trivedi MH, Walker R, Ling W, et al. Bupropion and naltrexone in methamphetamine use disorder. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(2):140–153. PMID: 33497547; PMCID: PMC8111570. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2020214

85. Wharton S, Yin P, Burrows M, et al. Extended-release naltrexone/bupropion is safe and effective among subjects with type 2 diabetes already taking incretin agents: a post-hoc analysis of the LIGHT trial. Int J Obes. 2021;45(8):1687–1695. PMID: 34083744; PMCID: PMC8310797. doi:10.1038/s41366-021-00831-4

86. Wellbutrin® (bupropion hydrochloride) tablets. Prescribing information; 2017. Available from: https://fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2017/018644s052lbl.pdf. Accessed September 21, 2022.

87. Sposito AC, Bonilha I, Luchiari B, et al. Cardiovascular safety of naltrexone and bupropion therapy: systematic review and meta-analyses. Obes Rev. 2021;22(6):e13224. PMID: 33847068. doi:10.1111/obr.13224

Creative Commons License © 2022 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.