Back to Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 5

Urologist-operated ultrasound and its use in urological outpatient clinics

Authors Moslemi MK, Mahfoozi B

Published 24 January 2011 Volume 2011:5 Pages 85—88


Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2

Mohammad Kazem Moslemi1, Behnam Mahfoozi2
1Department of Urology, Kamkar Hospital, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran; 2Department of Radiology, Shahid Chamran Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Introduction: Ultrasonograghy plays an important role in the evaluation of urinary tract disorders in cases of medical or surgical renal disorders, because of its lower cost, availability, and lack of ionizing radiation and because with it there is no need for contrast material injection or ingestion. It needs no intervention or preparation and specifically can differentiate between the multiple causes of flank pain. Urologist-operated sonography is a quick, cost-effective, and time-saving modality for both the physician and patient for obtaining first or final diagnosis. Based on its results, patients can be selected for appropriate management and further assessment.
Materials and methods: The efficacy of ultrasound examination by a trained urologist in the differentiation of urological emergencies admitted in a district private clinic was studied. Between April 2008 and April 2010, a total of 724 patients (1448 renal units) had renal ultrasound performed by a trained urologist on acute admission. The sonographic findings were compared with subsequent definitive radiological investigations performed as needed, such as KUB (kidney, ureter, bladder) or IVP (intravenous pyelogram). Patient satisfaction and permission for ultrasonography were evaluated by oral consent. Loin pain was the presenting symptom in 45% of the patients (n = 326 cases).
Results: Diagnosis was achieved in 96% of patients. Further evaluations were requested as needed in suspicious cases. If any hydronephrosis was detected and patients' history and/or complaints were suggestive of renal or ureteral stones, an outpatient KUB was requested. For more complex situations, IVP was the next option. Abnormal findings were recorded in 184 cases (25.5%). Mild to moderate unilateral hydronephrosis with or without hydronephrosis was the most common finding observed sonographically. The sensitivity of our ultrasonography evaluation was 99.7%.
Conclusion: Office urologist-operated sonograghy may supplement the information available through routine history, physical examination, and laboratory studies. Our study shows that urological trainees can use ultrasound with high levels of accuracy, thereby improving patient management with a high level of patient satisfaction.

Keywords: ultrasonograghy, kidney, bladder, urologist, CT scan, cystourethroscopy, KUB (kidney, ureter, bladder), urologist-operated sonography (UOS)

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]


Other articles by this author:

Does intraperitoneal injection of propofol prior to detorsion improve testes weight and histopathological findings in a rat model?

Amirhassani S, Mehrabi S, Hosseinipanah SM, Iloon Kashkouli A, Torabian S, Moslemi MK

Research and Reports in Urology 2017, 9:101-105

Published Date: 16 June 2017

Mathieu repair of distal and midshaft hypospadias: risks and benefits of foreskin reconstruction versus circumcision

Moslemi MK, Sadighi Gilani MA, Shahrokh H

Research and Reports in Urology 2011, 3:105-108

Published Date: 17 June 2011

Genitourinary system trauma after 2003 Bam earthquake in Kerman, Iran

Mohammad Hasan Dehghani Firoozabadi, Mehdi Abedinzadeh, Mohammad Kazem Moslemi

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2011, 7:49-52

Published Date: 9 February 2011

Selenium–vitamin E supplementation in infertile men: effects on semen parameters and pregnancy rate

Mohammad K Moslemi, Samaneh Tavanbakhsh

International Journal of General Medicine 2011, 4:99-104

Published Date: 23 January 2011

Comparative evaluation of prophylactic single-dose intravenous antibiotic with postoperative antibiotics in elective urologic surgery

Mohammad K Moslemi, Seyed M Moosavi Movahed, Akram Heidari, et al

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2010, 6:551-556

Published Date: 9 November 2010

An improved delivery system for bladder irrigation

Mohammad K Moslemi, Mojtaba Rajaei

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2010, 6:459-462

Published Date: 30 September 2010

Readers of this article also read:

Green synthesis of water-soluble nontoxic polymeric nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles

Prozorova GF, Pozdnyakov AS, Kuznetsova NP, Korzhova SA, Emel’yanov AI, Ermakova TG, Fadeeva TV, Sosedova LM

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1883-1889

Published Date: 16 April 2014

Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-Fluorouracil in the colon

Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779

Published Date: 15 November 2012

A novel preparation method for silicone oil nanoemulsions and its application for coating hair with silicone

Hu Z, Liao M, Chen Y, Cai Y, Meng L, Liu Y, Lv N, Liu Z, Yuan W

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5719-5724

Published Date: 12 November 2012

Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy

Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088

Published Date: 27 July 2012

Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection

Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711

Published Date: 14 July 2010