Back to Journals » OncoTargets and Therapy » Volume 8

Urine microRNAs as biomarkers for bladder cancer: a diagnostic meta-analysis

Authors Cheng Y, Deng X, Yang X, Li P, Zhang X, Li P, Tao J, Lu Q, Wang Z

Received 19 April 2015

Accepted for publication 25 June 2015

Published 11 August 2015 Volume 2015:8 Pages 2089—2096

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S86908

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Jianmin Xu


Yidong Cheng,* Xiaheng Deng,* Xiao Yang,* Pengchao Li, Xiaolei Zhang, Peng Li, Jun Tao, Qiang Lu, Zengjun Wang

Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Background: The diagnostic value of microRNA (miRNA) detection in patients with bladder cancer (BCa) is controversial. We performed a diagnostic meta-analysis to evaluate current evidence on the use of miRNA assays to diagnose BCa.
Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science for studies published before March 31, 2015. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the overall test performance. Subgroup analyses were used to explore the between-study heterogeneity. Deeks’ funnel plot asymmetry test was used to test publication bias. We applied the software of RevMan 5.2 and Stata 11.0 to the meta-analysis.
Results: A total of 23 studies from nine articles were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 719 patients and 494 controls. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68–0.80) and 0.75 (95% CI, 0.70–0.80), respectively. The pooled positive likelihood ratio was 3.03 (95% CI, 2.50–3.67); negative likelihood ratio was 0.33 (95% CI, 0.27–0.42); and diagnostic odds ratio was 9.07 (95% CI, 6.35–12.95). The pooled AUC was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.78–0.85). Subgroup analyses indicated that the multiple miRNAs assays and urine supernatant assays showed high accuracies in diagnosing BCa.
Conclusion: The miRNA assays may serve as potential noninvasive diagnostic tool for the detection of BCa. However, the clinical application of miRNA assays for BCa diagnosis still needs further validation by large prospective studies.

Keywords: microRNAs, bladder cancer, diagnostic accuracy, meta-analysis

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]