Undermining a common language: smartphone applications for eye emergencies
Authors Charlesworth JM, Davidson MA
Received 5 September 2018
Accepted for publication 26 October 2018
Published 15 January 2019 Volume 2019:12 Pages 21—40
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Jennifer M Charlesworth,1,2 Myriam A Davidson2
1School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland; 2AM Charlesworth & Associates Science and Technology Consultants, Ottawa, ON, Canada
Background: Emergency room physicians are frequently called upon to assess eye injuries and vision problems in the absence of specialized ophthalmologic equipment. Technological applications that can be used on mobile devices are only now becoming available.
Objective: To review the literature on the evidence of clinical effectiveness of smartphone applications for visual acuity assessment marketed by two providers (Google Play and iTunes).
Methods: The websites of two mobile technology vendors (iTunes and Google Play) in Canada and Ireland were searched on three separate occasions using the terms “eye”, “ocular”, “ophthalmology”, “optometry”, “vision”, and “visual assessment” to determine what applications were currently available. Four medical databases (Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, Medline) were subsequently searched with the same terms AND mobile OR smart phone for papers in English published in years 2010–2017.
Results: A total of 5,024 Canadian and 2,571 Irish applications were initially identified. After screening, 44 were retained. Twelve relevant articles were identified from the health literature. After screening, only one validation study referred to one of our identified applications, and this one only partially validated the application as being useful for clinical purposes.
Conclusion: Mobile device applications in their current state are not suitable for emergency room ophthalmologic assessment, because systematic validation is lacking.
Keywords: visual assessment, visual acuity and emergency medicine, epidemiology, methodology, ophthalmology, ocular
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]