Back to Journals » Risk Management and Healthcare Policy » Volume 13

Unattended Pregnancies and Perinatal Mortality in Georgia

Authors Manjavidze T, Rylander C, Skjeldestad FE, Kazakhashvili N, Anda EE

Received 20 December 2019

Accepted for publication 7 March 2020

Published 15 April 2020 Volume 2020:13 Pages 313—321

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S243207

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Kent Rondeau


Tinatin Manjavidze,1 Charlotta Rylander,1 Finn Egil Skjeldestad,1 Nata Kazakhashvili,2 Erik Eik Anda1

1Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø 9037, Norway; 2Department of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi 0179, Georgia

Correspondence: Tinatin Manjavidze
35a Guramishvili Ave, Tbilisi 0178, Georgia
Tel +995 598292936
Email tinatin.manjavidze@uit.no

Introduction: The majority of pregnant women in Georgia attend the free-of-charge, national antenatal care (ANC) programme, but over 5% of pregnancies in the country are unattended. Moreover, Georgia has one of the highest perinatal mortality (PM) rates in Europe (11.7/1000 births).
Purpose: To assess the association between unattended pregnancies and the risk of PM.
Methods: Data were extracted from the Georgian Birth Registry (GBR) and the national vital registration system. All mothers who had singleton births and delivered in medical facilities in Georgia in 2017– 2018 were included in the study and categorised into attended pregnancies (at least one ANC visit during pregnancy) and unattended pregnancies (no ANC visits during pregnancy). After exclusions, the study sample included 101,663 women and their newborns, of which 1186 were either stillborn or died within 7 days. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect of unattended pregnancies on PM.
Results: During the study period, the PM rate was 12.9/1000 births. In total, 5.6% of women had unattended pregnancies. The odds of PM among women with unattended pregnancies were more than double those among women with attended pregnancies (odds ratio=2.21, [95% confidence interval: 1.81– 2.70]). Multiparous women with higher education and who resided/delivered outside of Tbilisi were significantly less likely to experience PM.
Conclusion: The risk of PM doubled among women with unattended pregnancies. Six percent of PM cases were attributable to unattended pregnancies. Targeting women with previous unattended pregnancies will likely reduce the PM rate in Georgia.

Keywords: stillbirth, early neonatal mortality, antenatal care, birth registry

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]