Back to Journals » Journal of Asthma and Allergy » Volume 15

The Role of Defective Epithelial Barriers in Allergic Lung Disease and Asthma Development

Authors Noureddine N, Chalubinski M , Wawrzyniak P 

Received 11 January 2022

Accepted for publication 6 April 2022

Published 18 April 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 487—504

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S324080

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Luis Garcia-Marcos



Nazek Noureddine,1– 3 Maciej Chalubinski,4 Paulina Wawrzyniak1,2

1Division of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; 2Children’s Research Center, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; 3Center for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; 4Department of Immunology and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland

Correspondence: Paulina Wawrzyniak, Division of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University Children’s Hospital Zurich, Zurich, 8032, Switzerland, Tel +41 44 266 75 42, Email [email protected]; [email protected]

Abstract: The respiratory epithelium constitutes the physical barrier between the human body and the environment, thus providing functional and immunological protection. It is often exposed to allergens, microbial substances, pathogens, pollutants, and environmental toxins, which lead to dysregulation of the epithelial barrier and result in the chronic inflammation seen in allergic diseases and asthma. This epithelial barrier dysfunction results from the disturbed tight junction formation, which are multi-protein subunits that promote cell–cell adhesion and barrier integrity. The increasing interest and evidence of the role of impaired epithelial barrier function in allergy and asthma highlight the need for innovative approaches that can provide new knowledge in this area. Here, we review and discuss the current role and mechanism of epithelial barrier dysfunction in developing allergic diseases and the effect of current allergy therapies on epithelial barrier restoration.

Keywords: bronchial epithelial cells, asthma, allergy, tight junction, inflammation

Introduction

The human respiratory system consists of the nasal cavity, trachea, respiratory bronchioles, and distal alveoli, and it is linked together with the cardiovascular system to accomplish gas exchange.1,2 The integral component in maintaining this process is a continuous layer of epithelial cells, which has a central role in defending the lungs against inhaled environmental factors. Airway epithelial cells are continuously exposed to several environmental factors and allergens, which are then cleared by the immune system. Mucociliary clearance is mediated by the actions of diverse conducting airway and secretory cells, such as goblet cells, and the mucous and serous cells in the submucosal glands. They secrete fluids, electrolytes, antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory proteins, and mucus onto airway surfaces and therefore play a critical role in protecting the lungs during an acute injury.3 The continuous exposure of bronchial epithelium to external and internal factors causes structural, protein and genetic changes, which contribute to the development of allergy and asthma. Several treatments for asthma and allergy symptoms are currently available for patients but there are also novel possible therapies and studies, that are aimed at improving the impaired epithelial barrier.

Structure of Bronchial Epithelial Cells

The airway epithelium is pseudostratified in the large airways and becomes columnar and cuboidal in the small airways. It consists of the predominant ciliated epithelial cells, mucous-secreting goblet cells, club cells, airway basal, suprabasal cells and rare cell types such as neuroendocrine cells, ionocytes, Hillock cells, and tuft cells (Figure 1, Table 1).4–6 Epithelial cells form a barrier between neighboring cells via junctional complexes which consist of apical tight junctions (TJs), adherens junctions (AJs), and desmosomes (Figure 2).7,8 TJs form a border between the apical and basolateral plasma-membrane domains, which controls cell polarization, transcription, growth, and differentiation. They are critical regulators of paracellular permeability and limit the transport of macromolecules.9–11 Approximately 40 different proteins have been identified as TJ components, and these include the main transmembrane proteins belonging to the claudin family (26 members in humans and 27 in mice) and the three junctional MARVEL (MAL and related proteins for vesicle trafficking and membrane link) domain proteins: occludin, tricellulin and MARVELD3 that regulate the recruitment of signaling complex proteins to TJs.8,12–14 Other transmembrane TJs include junctional adhesion molecules (JAMs), coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor and angulins (also known as lipolysis-stimulated lipoprotein receptors).8,15,16 The zonula occludens (ZO)-1, ZO-2, and ZO-3 cytoplasmic molecules bind directly to occludin and claudin on one end while also linking to actin fibers on the other end, which is essential for the epithelial barrier function. Several other proteins are located in the cytoplasm, such as multi-PDZ domain protein-1 (MUPP1), cell polarity molecules ASIP/PAR-3, PAR-6, PALS-1, and PALS-1-associated tight junction (PATJ); and non-PDZ proteins, cingulin, symplekin, ZONAB, GEF-H1, aPKC, PP2A, Rab3b, Rab13, PTEN, and 7H6.17,18 Multiple protein interactions couple the extra- and intracellular signaling that allows the complexity and plasticity of TJ function.13,19

Table 1 Types of Bronchial Epithelial Cells

Figure 1 Bronchial epithelial cells repertoire. Common cell types: basal cells, suprabasal cells, goblet cells, club cells (Clara cells) and ciliated cells. Rare cell types: neuroendocrine cells, ionocytes, Hillock cells and Tuft cells (brush cells). Created with affinity.serif.com.

Figure 2 The junctional complex of bronchial epithelial cells. Tight junctions, adherens junction, gap junctions and desmosomes are intracellular junctions which regulate the transport of ions, water and macromolecules between tissue and lumen. TJs consist of claudins, occludin, tricellulin, and JAMs, located directly between neighboring bronchial epithelial cells. They directly interact with cytoplasmic TJs such as cingulin, MUPP1, MAGIs, non-PDZ proteins, and ZO-1, ZO-2, ZO-3 which bind directly to occludin and claudin on one end while also linking to actin fibers on the other end. Created with affinity.serif.com.

AJs are cadherin-catenin adhesion complexes located below TJs and have an important role in tissue homeostasis, stabilization, and transcriptional and intracellular signaling.20 Cadherin adhesion molecules are core AJ components.21 The cytoplasmic tail of classic cadherin binds to the catenins, which allows for links to cytoskeletal networks as well as to the exocytotic and endocytic machinery. Crosstalk between cadherin–catenin clusters and actin regulators controls AJ assembly from initial cell–cell contacts.20 Gap junction proteins (GJs), connexins, which are expressed in different types of cells in the lung tissue, coordinate ciliary beat frequency, enable the direct flow of signaling molecules and metabolites between cells, and regulate inflammation.22 Desmosomes are specialized adhesive protein complexes responsible for maintaining the mechanical integrity of tissues.24 They may also act as signaling centers, regulating the availability of signaling molecules and participating in fundamental processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and morphogenesis.25 Desmosome composition and size vary depending on tissue-specific expression and differentiation state. Their constituent proteins are highly regulated by post-translational modifications that control their function in the desmosome itself and regulate many desmosome-independent functions.26

All these components of airway epithelium, besides their specific functions, closely interact with each other to form and maintain the epithelial cells’ polarity from the apical and basolateral sides.19 It was shown that TJs proteins like ZO-1, which are distributed in AJs and GJs, interact with their proteins like E-cadherin (AJs) and certain connexins (GJs) Such interactions are important for transmitting signals between intracellular junctions and inner cells.19,27–29 Furthermore, the association between a cadherin and plakoglobin, the only known component of desmosomes and AJs, is essential for desmosomes formations.30 The flexibility of cadherin molecules was shown to have an impact on desmosomes plasticity on strong calcium-independent hyper adhesion in adult tissues and on weaker calcium-dependent adhesion in wounds.31 The proper function and homeostasis of airway epithelial cells works through the cooperation of junctional complex molecules.

What Causes Epithelial Barrier Damage?

Airway epithelial cells are an essential part of the innate immune system in the lung. They are susceptible to damage due to exposure to allergens with complex proteolytic activity like house dust mite (HDM) (Der p 1, Der p 3, Der p 6, Der p 9), pollen (Ragweed pollen, Amb a, Birch pollen, Bet v), fungi (Aspergillus fumigatus and Aspergillus oryzae, Asp f 5, Asp f 6, Asp f 11), cockroaches (Bla g) and also animal dander and pathogens.32–34 Allergens with a protease activity were shown to injure the airway epithelial cells and help with initiation of allergen uptake by mucosal dendritic cells (DC) and antigen presentation with major histocompatibility class II to naïve T cells.33,35 In mice, the intraepithelial DC expressing TJs claudin-1, claudin-7 and ZO-2, and the interaction with E-cadherin expressed by epithelial cells is used to uptake allergens by dendritic extensions between epithelial cells.32,35 Infection of human bronchial epithelial cells (HBECs) with human rhinovirus increased their permeability and altered their TJs expression.36 Whereas, respiratory syncytial virus infection in mice was seen only in lung parenchyma with decreased mRNA expression of claudin-1 and occludin observed in whole lungs. This observation was not seen in asthmatic HBECs.37

Increasing numbers of diseases with epithelial barrier damage are caused by lifestyle changes due to urbanization and modernization, and as a result more environmental toxins such as air pollutants, cigarette smoke and ozone are released, which affect more than one billion people worldwide.38–45 The cadmium present in air pollutants and cigarette smoke disrupts epithelial integrity in in vitro human air-liquid interface (ALI) cultures through both occludin hyperphosphorylation via kinase activation and by direct disruption of the junction-interacting complex.46 Recent studies have also revealed that nanoparticles, macroparticles, and toxins contained in laundry, dishwashing, and household cleaning agents can cause epithelial barrier disturbance in human keratinocytes and human bronchial epithelial cells.47–50 Disturbance to the homeostatic balance in the epithelium including loss of differentiation, impairment of junctional complexes or insufficient innate immune response define the epithelial barrier dysfunction.51 The disruption of the basic functions of the epithelium manifested in inability to rebuild causes the penetration of inflammatory cells.5 This leads to chronic inflammatory airway diseases like asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis, which are heterogeneous diseases with complex etiology.52 It was shown that the airway epithelium in asthmatic patients and in vitro ALI cultures is less differentiated, has elevated numbers of basal cells, and has increased phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase.53 The epithelial permeability was higher in asthma, specifically severe asthma, compared to mild asthma, and in biopsy specimens from patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.53–57 This decreased integrity of epithelial barrier was associated with decreased expression of the TJs molecules occludin and ZO-1. In in vitro study of asthma and HDM-induced allergic rhinitis, claudin-18 was shown in epithelial brushings in asthma patients and healthy controls. AJ like E-cadherin and β-catenin in patients with atopic asthma, were also shown to contribute to the disease development.56,58–61 E-cadherin plays an important role in the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, a cellular process where epithelial cells acquire mesenchymal phenotypes and behavior following the downregulation of epithelial features. The epithelial cells lose their cell polarity and cell–cell adhesion, then display fibroblast-like morphology and cytoarchitecture, and gain migratory and invasive properties.62,63 The Wnt/β-catenin pathway was shown to be involved in the remodeling process of fibrosis and allergic inflammation in a genetically modified mouse model.64 Blocking of β-catenin pathway could be a promising therapeutic target in asthma because it can reduce allergic airway inflammation in mouse models.65,66

Disruption of the complex lung epithelium structure by the external components of the environment initiates the immune response, which could enhance the disease development and lead to a chronic stage.

Epithelial Cell Response to Danger

The response of bronchial epithelium to danger is manifested by elevated serum IgE, increased smooth muscle mass, subepithelial fibrosis, epithelial desquamation, eosinophilic airway inflammation, and goblet cell hyperplasia.67 The airway epithelium acts as a chemical barrier against environmental insults by secreting, for example, antimicrobial peptides, anti-proteases, and antioxidants.52 The epithelial cells recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns on inhaled microbes, parasites, and allergens as well as alarmins/damage-associated molecular patterns released from dying or damaged cells by expressing pattern recognition receptors like toll-like receptors, retinoic acid-inducible gene like receptors, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain like receptors, C-type lectin receptors, protease activated receptor 2 and purinergic receptors.68,69 Upon activation, epithelial cells produce and release chemokines, growth factors, lipid mediators, pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-25, IL-33, CCL20, CCL17, thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) which then attract and activate cells from the innate and adaptive immune system (Figure 3).70,71 It has been shown that epithelial expression of the neutrophil chemoattractant IL‐8 and macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha is increased in the biopsies from severe asthma patients. Their presence correlates with increased epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression as a marker of epithelial damage.72 Human and mouse studies have revealed another molecule secreted by the respiratory epithelial cells which is nitric oxide that plays a role in ion transport, modulation of inflammation, and wound repair processes after injury.73–75 Impairment of epithelial barrier induces deposition of extracellular matrix components and release of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which cause an increase in the size of airway wall vessels and promotes angiogenesis.76,77 The airway epithelium maintains an active physical and functional barrier, and responds to the danger with secretion of cytokines, chemokines and mediators therefore activating innate and adaptive immune cells.

Figure 3 Mechanisms involved in a bronchial epithelial cell response to environmental factors and allergens. Airway epithelial cells are susceptible to damage as a result of exposure to allergens (house dust mite, pollen, and animal dander), pathogens (viruses, bacteria), and environmental toxins (air pollutants, cigarette smoke, ozone, detergents). Disruption of bronchial epithelium, indicated by red cell junctions, decreases the barrier integrity as evidenced by lower expression of TJs (occludin, ZO-1, E-cadherin, β-catenin, JAM and EGFR). Consequently, epithelial cells respond by secretion of cytokines IL-25, IL-33, and TSLP, which then attract other inflammatory cells like Th2 (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13), ILC2 (IL-13, IL-5), B cells, and dendritic cells (DC). Additional manifestations of respiratory disease occur in response to lipid mediators. Epithelial cells can also produce PAF and eicosanoids which have been shown to be chemotactic for neutrophils (neu), basophils (baso) and macrophages (mØ), activate eosinophils (eos) and macrophages, and alter vascular and epithelial permeability. Chronic inflammation also causes epigenetic changes in the bronchial epithelial cells by increasing DNA methylation and activating HDACs. Created with affinity.serif.com.

The Influence of Cytokines on Epithelial Barrier Disorders

The main players driving the allergic disease pathology are T helper 2 (Th2) cells and their cytokines IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13.78 During allergic airway inflammation, Wu et al observed elevated levels of IL-5 in mice in bronchial epithelial cells, which can impact the microenvironment of the lung by modifying pathologic and protective immune responses in the airways.79 We have shown that Th2 cell numbers and the level of their cytokines, IL-4 and IL-13, decreased barrier integrity in ALI cultures of HBECs from control subjects. The HBECs from asthmatic patients had an initial low trans-epithelial resistance and reduced expression of ZO-1 and occludin, and the treatment with Th2 cells and cytokines IL-4 and IL-13 did not show any further changes. These cytokines induced a physical separation of the TJs of adjacent cells as seen in the immunofluorescence staining of the TJ molecules occludin and ZO-1.55 Th2 cells and their cytokines (IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-9) are necessary to initiate and propagate the inflammation associated with allergy. They induce class switching of B-cells to produce allergen-specific IgE, recruit mast cells (IL-9) and eosinophils (IL-5) to sites of allergic inflammation and induce goblet cell metaplasia (IL-4, IL-13).80,81 Type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2) through IL-13 were also linked to asthma pathogenesis by reducing human and mice epithelial barrier integrity.82 Similar results were observed in the analysis of TJs in bronchial biopsies from asthmatic subjects and in vitro cultures.56 Mouse studies demonstrated decreased expression of ZO-1, ZO-2, occludin, and claudin-5-8-18 and −23 in three chronic HDM models of eosinophilic, neutrophilic and mixed granulocyte asthma.83 In addition, prolonged interferon (IFN) production impairs lung epithelial regeneration during influenza recovery in mice.84 IFNγ and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) synergistically or singly disrupt barrier function in ALI cultures associated with reduced ZO-1 and JAM expression.54,85,86 Zabner et al showed that histamine, which is a crucial agonist released during the immediate response to an inhaled allergen, increases paracellular airway permeability and increases the susceptibility of airway epithelial cells to infection by adenovirus by interrupting E-cadherin adhesion (Figure 3).87,88 During the acute inflammatory response to pathogens or tissue injury, respiratory epithelium produces and releases eicosanoids together with cytokines and chemokines, and mediators such as histamine (Figure 3).89 They induce the recruitment of neutrophils and other immune cells into the tissue to engulf and kill invading pathogens. The two classes of eicosanoids, leukotrienes and prostaglandins, were shown to be increased in the airways of asthmatic patients and could be involved in asthma pathogenesis.90 They are metabolites of the cyclooxygenase (COX) and 5-lipoxygenase (5-LOX) pathways. Several studies have reported increased levels of COX pathway products, prostaglandin D (PGD2), prostaglandin F2 alpha and thromboxane B2 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of allergic asthmatic.91,92 Specifically, PGD2 activities might contribute to asthma pathogenesis by vasodilation, increased capillary permeability, mucus production by lung epithelial cells, bronchoconstriction, and eosinophil recruitment.93 PGD2 has also been implicated in the trafficking of T cells in allergic inflammation.94 In addition, leukotriene B4 (LTB4) and the cysteinyl leukotrienes (Cys-LTs), products of the 5-LOX pathway, have been shown to be higher in exhaled breath condensate from asthmatic patients.95 Cys-LTs were also reported to be higher in the induced sputum of asthmatic patients and their level correlated with disease severity.96 LTB4 has also been shown to induce chemotaxis of effector T cells to the airways of mice immediately after exposure to an allergen.97,98 In addition to eicosanoids, platelet- activating factor (PAF), a phospholipid mediator, is prevalent in asthmatic airways. It is produced by various cells, including neutrophils, eosinophils, mast cells, fibroblasts, epithelial cells, and endothelial cells.99 In the airways, PAF acts as a potent chemoattractant for neutrophils and eosinophils, promotes vascular permeability and edema and causes bronchoconstriction via acting on airway smooth muscle.100

During the resolution phase in the lungs, specialized pro-resolving mediators (SPMs) are produced by leukocytes, platelets, bronchial epithelial cells, alveolar epithelial type II cells as well as alveolar macrophages.101 Their actions include participation in epithelial cell restoring, inhibition neutrophils’ influx and activation, efferocytosis and phagocytosis of microorganisms, allergens and debris by macrophages as well as lymphocyte differentiation to effector cells that produce healing cytokines such as TGFβ.102,103

Severe asthma is resistant to current therapies and is marked by decreased lipoxin production in the airways due to the aberrant metabolism of AA.104–106 Reduced levels of lipoxins, specifically lipoxin A4 (LXA4), have been linked to more severe airway inflammation and a higher degree of airway obstruction.106 In contrast, LXA4 inhalation by asthmatic patients has been shown to affect airway response by attenuating the leukotriene C4-triggered airway obstruction and improved lung function in asthmatic children.107,108 Infiltrating eosinophils during asthma pathogenesis are producing not only pro-inflammatory cytokines like IFNγ109 but also LXA4 which has been shown to suppress chemotaxis towards chemoattractants and inhibit the GM-CSF triggered secretion of IL-13 and eotaxin in vitro.110 Eosinophils from severe asthmatic patients expressed lower levels of ALX the receptor for LXA4, compared to healthy humans.111 Activation of ALX by LXA4 has protective benefits in the lung airway by promoting the proliferation and wound repair of human airway epithelial cells.112 The activation of this receptor on natural killer cells from asthma patients also increased their triggered apoptosis of eosinophils.113 Various studies reported the beneficial and pro-resolution effects of resolvin E1 in murine models of allergic airway inflammation, where it was shown to decrease eosinophil influx, airway hyperresponsiveness, and the secretion of IL-23, IL-17 and IL-6 in the lung while also increasing the production of LXA4.114,115 Resolvin D1 has also been shown to decrease allergic lung inflammation by stimulating the macrophages clearance of allergens.116 Protectin D1 treatment after an allergen challenge in mouse lungs was associated with a faster resolution of airway inflammation.117 Classically regarded as a pro-inflammatory mediator, PGE2 (prostaglandin E2) can promote resolution.118 PGE2 by inhibiting the proliferation, activation, and secretion of cytokines by ILC2.119 Studies in asthmatic patients reported an inverse correlation between the sputum levels of PGE2 and eosinophil numbers, thus suggesting it can play a role in reducing airway eosinophilia.96,120 Additionally, inhaled PGE2 was shown to have antiallergic effects by reducing the early and late bronchoconstrictor response to an allergen in asthmatic individuals.121 PGI2 (prostacyclin) has been mostly studied in mice models of asthma where it was involved in decreasing allergic inflammation by signaling through its receptor IP, as well as reducing lung fibrosis and remodelling.122–124

Systemic inflammation coordinated by a large number of factors such as cytokines, chemokines and mediators produced by immune cells, interact with each other and consequently cause changes in the bronchial epithelium. Long-term changes in the TJs protein expression, which are important for the maintenance and proper function of epithelial cells, can have an impact on the chronic stage of diseases.

Genetic and Epigenetic Changes in Bronchial Epithelium

Under the influence of external factors and immune cell responses, bronchial epithelial cells undergo many changes in their DNA structure and post-translational genetic modifications. Several epithelial-derived genes have been identified in genome-wide association studies, such as metalloprotease 33 (ADAM33)125 and protocadherin-1 (PCDH1),126,127 which are associated with epithelial barrier function, differentiation, and homeostasis. Cadherin-related family member 3 (CDHR3) as a receptor for rhinovirus C was associated with childhood asthma with severe exacerbations.128,129 β2-adrenergic receptor haplotype pair (2/4) was shown to be associated with severe asthma,130 while serine peptidase inhibitor, Kazal type 5 (SPINK5), and TSLP were associated with childhood asthma.131 A large study involving more than a hundred centers worldwide identified genes associated with asthma on chromosomes 2 (IL1RL1/IL18R1), 6 (HLA-DQ), 9 (IL33), 15 (SMAD3), 17 (ORMDL3/GSDMB), and 22 (IL2RB).132 IL1RL1 encodes the ST2 receptor (ST2L) for IL-33, which promotes type 2 inflammation in some asthma patients. Soluble isoform, IL-1RL1-a or sST2, acts as a decoy receptor by sequestering IL-33, thereby inhibiting IL1RL1-b/IL-33 signaling, which could be used as a biomarker or target for pharmacological intervention.133,134 Orosomucoid- like 3 (ORMDL3), was shown to play an important role in regulating epithelial barrier function in allergic asthma,135–137 rhinovirus infection138,139 and by inducing the p-ERK/MMP-9 pathway to promote pathological airway remodeling in patients with asthma.140 SMAD3 is an essential signal transducer in TGF-β signaling, which is elevated in airway epithelial cells of some asthmatics141,142 and is involved in the response of bronchial epithelial cells to viral infection.143,144 Deletion of P2Y13 in human airway epithelial cells and in a mouse model protects against asthma exacerbations.145 A study in Der f 1 stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells from dust mite sensitized patients showed upregulation of IL9, IL5, and proteoglycan 2 (PRG2) expression with evidence for an interaction of IL9 polymorphisms with dust mite in childhood asthma.146

Changes in bronchial epithelial cells also lead to epigenetic changes like DNA methylation, histone modification, and microRNA modifications, defined as heritable changes in gene activity without an alteration in the DNA sequence.147–149 Recent studies in epigenome-wide association studies have shown an association between epigenetic signatures and allergic diseases, including pediatric asthma.150–152 We showed a higher methylation level in bronchial epithelial cells from asthma donors following the changes in genes associated with cell growth, ion transport, and cytoskeletal remodeling. Additionally, higher methylation was observed in genes involved in the regulation of bronchial barrier integrity, eg, TJ family members: AMOTL1, CLDN11, CLDN18, MAGI1, TJP2, JAM3, actin protein: ACTB, a component of the cytoskeleton: TUBA1C, ROCK2, LLGL1. Interestingly ten-eleven translocation enzyme (TET1), which can reverse CpG methylation, was methylated in asthmatic HBEC.153 Vermeulen et al reported differentially methylated regions between persistent asthma, remission, and healthy controls associated with ciliated epithelium genes.154 Also, short-term exposure of bronchial epithelial cells to diesel exhaust, a significant contributor to air pollution, alters DNA methylation and could be implicated in pulmonary pathologies.155 DNA-methyltransferases (Dnmts) play a crucial role in the methylation process. Qin et al showed that the bronchial epithelial Dnmt3b impairs the host defense during Pseudomonas-induced pneumonia, at least in part, by dampening the mucosal responses to flagellin.156 Additionally, Dnmt1 deficiency disrupts epithelial-mesenchymal crosstalk and leads to an early-branching defect. It also causes a loss of epithelial polarity and proximal endodermal cell differentiation.157 We showed that the inhibition of Dnmts restores leakiness in the bronchial epithelium in asthma.153 Bronchial epithelium can also be influenced by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs), that antagonistically control the overall balance of post-translational modification of DNA core histone proteins (Figure 3). They play a crucial role in cell signaling, cell cycle control, and epigenetic gene transcription regulation. HDAC inhibitors can inhibit these enzymes, resulting in the increased acetylation of histones, thereby affecting gene expression.158 The HDAC family consists of 11 members of HDACs and 7 silent information regulator genes. We have shown that human bronchial epithelial cells from asthma patients showed higher HDAC activity with higher expression of HDAC1 and HDAC9. Most HDACs were significantly upregulated in control subjects and asthmatic patients upon IL-4 and IL-13 stimulation.55 Similarly, Steelant et al159 observed increased HDACs activity in allergic rhinitis patients with high expression of HDAC5 and HDAC11 and decreased HDAC2 was reported in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.160 In a mouse model of ovalbumin (OVA)-induced asthma, HDAC4 was upregulated in the lung tissue.161 We and others have also shown that inhibition of endogenous HDAC activity reconstitutes the defective barrier by increasing TJ expression.55,159,161–163 Genetic and epigenetic changes in the bronchial epithelial cells are an important part of the complex changes observed upon epithelium injury and therefore could be a possible approach to improving the epithelial barrier.

The Effect of Treatment of Asthma and Allergy on Epithelial Barrier and Airway Remodeling

Epithelial barrier disruption, as a feature of airway remodeling which represents structural changes in bronchial wall encompassing wall thickening, basal membrane thickening, overgrowth of smooth muscle cell layer and enhanced angiogenesis, is observed in asthma patients. The effect of long-term asthma treatment on epithelial barrier and airway remodeling has been intensively studied (Table 2). Inhaled corticosteroids and β2-adrenoreceptor agonists are the first-line medications used in asthma treatment and are effective in most patients. Several data indicate that glucocorticoids (GCs) inhalation therapy, including budesonide, can improve epithelial barrier integrity and might contribute to the therapeutic effects of GCs for treating asthma164,165 or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.166 Similarly, other GCs, including mometasone and fluticasone, were shown to be effective in restoring nasal epithelial barrier dysfunction in allergic rhinitis.167 In animal models, budesonide was also proved to inhibit airway remodeling in the early stage of allergen-induced airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR), however it did not reverse established AHR.168,169 Interestingly, neither formoterol nor Montelukast, were shown to promote barrier integrity,165 suggesting that β2-adrenoreceptor agonists and anti-leukotrienes themselves might not have any positive effect on epithelial barrier restoration. In severe asthma patients, the long-term oral corticosteroid (CS) therapy is associated with serious side effects.170 Therefore, currently, several biologicals are used in severe asthma treatment as an alternative for systemic CS. Currently, they encompass omalizumab (anti-IgE), mepolizumab (anti-IL-5), benralizumab (anti-IL5R), dupilumab (anti-IL4/13R) and reslizumab (anti-IL-5) approved by the Food and Drug Administration.171 The question is posed whether they may affect epithelial barrier disruption and related bronchial remodeling in asthma patients. As omalizumab has been used for more than 15 years, there are some data indicating that it may decrease unfavorable structural airway changes in allergic asthmatics, with respect to the fibronectin deposit, the increased thickness of the basal lamina and the bronchial wall thickness.172–174 Treatment with mepolizumab significantly reduced the expression of three extracellular matrix proteins: tenascin, lumican and procollagen III in the reticular basement membrane.171 Benralizumab caused the consequent 29% relative reduction of airways smooth muscle mass and number of tissues myofibroblasts.175 As IL-13 and IL-4 partly share the same receptor and signaling pathways and both are deeply involved in mucus secretion and airways remodeling dupilumab might exert a positive effect on airway remodelling.176 Additionally, Anti-VEGF and TNF inhibition therapy was shown to be an effective treatment for remodeling in asthma with the significant restoration of the epithelial barrier.177

Table 2 Summary of Current and Novel Biological Therapies to Treat Asthma and Allergic Diseases

Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) represents the only curative treatment in which an allergic patient is incrementally exposed to increasing quantities of a specific antigen, such as pollen, fungi, HDM, or food allergens.152 Successful AIT induces the reinstatement of tolerance toward allergens and represents a disease-modifying treatment.178 Long-term efficacy with allergen immunotherapy is associated with decreases in IgE-dependent activation of mast cells, tissue eosinophilia, regulatory T cells induction and local and systemic IgG, IgG4, and IgA antibodies.179,180 In the mouse model of allergen specific immunotherapy (SIT), the restoration of the airway epithelial integrity was observed. Additionally, the use of 4-PBA, an inhibitor of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, suppressed IL-25 induced airway epithelial ER stress and apoptosis triggered by Dermatophagoides farinae (Der f).181 SIT has also been shown to affect HDM‐induced activation of lung structural cells including airway epithelium.182 Sublingual Immunotherapy was also shown to have a beneficial impact on airway wall thickness and remodeling in allergic asthma.183

Novel anti-inflammatory mediator, secretoglobin1A1, was shown as a long-term allergen-specific therapeutic intervention that can suppress pro-inflammatory epithelial gene expression.184 Several recent studies have studied novel molecules which could be used as a new potential treatment for allergy and asthma. We have shown that the oral gavage of polyamines spermine or spermidine can modulate HDM-induced cell infiltration, cytokine secretion, and epithelial cell tight junction expression in murine models.185 Additionally, a redox-sensitive transcription factor Nuclear erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), a key regulator of oxidative and environmental stress, enhanced epithelial barrier function and increased localization of ZO-1 to the cell surface.186 Furthermore, a study using the cannabinoid WIN55212‐2 illustrated an essential role of this chemical in restoring airway epithelial barrier during rhinovirus infection and in suppressing T cell-mediated inflammation in human tonsil cells.187

Conclusion

The influence of external factors and immune cell responses, cytokines and mediators associated with allergic airway inflammation can disrupt the epithelial barrier by interfering with junctional complex assembly. Understanding all the changes occurring in the bronchial epithelium during injury is very important for developing future possible treatments for asthma and allergy diseases. It is still unclear whether, the increased airway epithelial permeability that enables transport of allergens, pathogens and other damaging factors is constant and predisposes to disease development. However, the changes in structure and function in bronchial epithelium asthma and allergic diseases are well documented and there are important indications that restoring the epithelial barrier could be a potential target for new treatments. Nevertheless, data on the effects of particular biological therapies on epithelial barrier and airway remodeling in allergy and asthma are currently incomplete and thus require further studies.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Davis JD, Wypych TP. Cellular and functional heterogeneity of the airway epithelium. Mucosal Immunol. 2021;14(5):978–990. doi:10.1038/s41385-020-00370-7

2. Basil MC, Katzen J, Engler AE, et al. The cellular and physiological basis for lung repair and regeneration: past, present, and future. Cell Stem Cell. 2020;26(4):482–502. doi:10.1016/j.stem.2020.03.009

3. Whitsett JA. Airway epithelial differentiation and mucociliary clearance. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2018;15(Suppl 3):S143–S148. doi:10.1513/AnnalsATS.201802-128AW

4. Crystal RG, Randell SH, Engelhardt JF, Voynow J, Sunday ME. Airway epithelial cells: current concepts and challenges. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008;5(7):772–777. doi:10.1513/pats.200805-041HR

5. Hellings PW, Steelant B. Epithelial barriers in allergy and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;145(6):1499–1509. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.010

6. Knight DA, Holgate ST. The airway epithelium: structural and functional properties in health and disease. Respirology. 2003;8(4):432–446. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00493.x

7. Cereijido M, Contreras RG, Shoshani L. Cell adhesion, polarity, and epithelia in the Dawn of metazoans. Physiol Rev. 2004;84(4):1229–1262. doi:10.1152/physrev.00001.2004

8. Zihni C, Mills C, Matter K, Balda MS. Tight junctions: from simple barriers to multifunctional molecular gates. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2016;17(9):564–580. doi:10.1038/nrm.2016.80

9. Shen L, Weber CR, Raleigh DR, Yu D, Turner JR. Tight junction pore and leak pathways: a dynamic duo. Annu Rev Physiol. 2011;73:283–309. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-012110-142150

10. Steelant B, Seys SF, Boeckxstaens G, Akdis CA, Ceuppens JL, Hellings PW. Restoring airway epithelial barrier dysfunction: a new therapeutic challenge in allergic airway disease. Rhinology. 2016;54(3):195–205. doi:10.4193/Rhino15.376

11. Otani T, Furuse M. Tight junction structure and function revisited: (trends in cell biology 30, 805–817, 2020). Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30(12):1014. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2020.10.001

12. Raleigh DR, Marchiando AM, Zhang Y, et al. Tight junction-associated MARVEL proteins marveld3, tricellulin, and occludin have distinct but overlapping functions. Mol Biol Cell. 2010;21(7):1200–1213. doi:10.1091/mbc.e09-08-0734

13. Vermette D, Hu P, Canarie MF, Funaro M, Glover J, Pierce RW. Tight junction structure, function, and assessment in the critically ill: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med Exp. 2018;6(1):37. doi:10.1186/s40635-018-0203-4

14. Kast JI, Wanke K, Soyka MB, et al. The broad spectrum of interepithelial junctions in skin and lung. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(2):544–547 e544. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2012.04.044

15. Luissint AC, Nusrat A, Parkos CA. JAM-related proteins in mucosal homeostasis and inflammation. Semin Immunopathol. 2014;36(2):211–226. doi:10.1007/s00281-014-0421-0

16. Cohen CJ, Shieh JT, Pickles RJ, Okegawa T, Hsieh JT, Bergelson JM. The coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor is a transmembrane component of the tight junction. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(26):15191–15196. doi:10.1073/pnas.261452898

17. Yuksel H, Turkeli A. Airway epithelial barrier dysfunction in the pathogenesis and prognosis of respiratory tract diseases in childhood and adulthood. Tissue Barriers. 2017;5(4):e1367458. doi:10.1080/21688370.2017.1367458

18. Tsukita S, Furuse M, Itoh M. Multifunctional strands in tight junctions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2001;2(4):285–293. doi:10.1038/35067088

19. Matter K, Balda MS. Signalling to and from tight junctions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4(3):225–236. doi:10.1038/nrm1055

20. Harris TJ, Tepass U. Adherens junctions: from molecules to morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2010;11(7):502–514. doi:10.1038/nrm2927

21. Takeichi M. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science. 1991;251(5000):1451–1455. doi:10.1126/science.2006419

22. Koval M. Sharing signals: connecting lung epithelial cells with gap junction channels. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2002;283(5):L875–L893. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00078.2002

23. Johnson LN, Koval M. Cross-talk between pulmonary injury, oxidant stress, and gap junctional communication. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2009;11(2):355–367. doi:10.1089/ars.2008.2183

24. Dubash AD, Green KJ. Desmosomes. Curr Biol. 2011;21(14):R529–531. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2011.04.035

25. Garrod D, Chidgey M. Desmosome structure, composition and function. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2008;1778(3):572–587. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.07.014

26. Muller L, Hatzfeld M, Keil R. Desmosomes as signaling hubs in the regulation of cell behavior. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:745670. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.745670

27. Rajasekaran AK, Hojo M, Huima T, Rodriguez-Boulan E. Catenins and zonula occludens-1 form a complex during early stages in the assembly of tight junctions. J Cell Biol. 1996;132(3):451–463. doi:10.1083/jcb.132.3.451

28. Itoh M, Nagafuchi A, Moroi S, Tsukita S. Involvement of ZO-1 in cadherin-based cell adhesion through its direct binding to alpha catenin and actin filaments. J Cell Biol. 1997;138(1):181–192. doi:10.1083/jcb.138.1.181

29. Reichert M, Muller T, Hunziker W. The PDZ domains of zonula occludens-1 induce an epithelial to mesenchymal transition of Madin-Darby canine kidney I cells. Evidence for a role of beta-catenin/Tcf/Lef signaling. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(13):9492–9500. doi:10.1074/jbc.275.13.9492

30. Lewis JE, Wahl JK 3rd, Sass KM, Jensen PJ, Johnson KR, Wheelock MJ. Cross-talk between adherens junctions and desmosomes depends on plakoglobin. J Cell Biol. 1997;136(4):919–934. doi:10.1083/jcb.136.4.919

31. Tariq H, Bella J, Jowitt TA, et al. Cadherin flexibility provides a key difference between desmosomes and adherens junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(17):5395–5400. doi:10.1073/pnas.1420508112

32. Herbert CA, King CM, Ring PC, et al. Augmentation of permeability in the bronchial epithelium by the house dust mite allergen Der p1. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1995;12(4):369–378. doi:10.1165/ajrcmb.12.4.7695916

33. Matsumura Y. Role of allergen source-derived proteases in sensitization via airway epithelial cells. J Allergy. 2012;2012:903659. doi:10.1155/2012/903659

34. Wan H, Winton HL, Soeller C, et al. Der p 1 facilitates transepithelial allergen delivery by disruption of tight junctions. J Clin Invest. 1999;104(1):123–133. doi:10.1172/JCI5844

35. Hammad H, Lambrecht BN. Dendritic cells and epithelial cells: linking innate and adaptive immunity in asthma. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(3):193–204. doi:10.1038/nri2275

36. Looi K, Troy NM, Garratt LW, et al. Effect of human rhinovirus infection on airway epithelium tight junction protein disassembly and transepithelial permeability. Exp Lung Res. 2016;42(7):380–395. doi:10.1080/01902148.2016.1235237

37. Kast JI, McFarlane AJ, Globinska A, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus infection influences tight junction integrity. Clin Exp Immunol. 2017;190(3):351–359. doi:10.1111/cei.13042

38. Akdis CA. Does the epithelial barrier hypothesis explain the increase in allergy, autoimmunity and other chronic conditions? Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(11):739–751. doi:10.1038/s41577-021-00538-7

39. Heijink IH, Brandenburg SM, Postma DS, van Oosterhout AJ. Cigarette smoke impairs airway epithelial barrier function and cell-cell contact recovery. Eur Respir J. 2012;39(2):419–428. doi:10.1183/09031936.00193810

40. Tamashiro E, Cohen NA, Palmer JN, Lima WT. Effects of cigarette smoking on the respiratory epithelium and its role in the pathogenesis of chronic rhinosinusitis. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;75(6):903–907. doi:10.1016/s1808-8694(15)30557-7

41. Schamberger AC, Staab-Weijnitz CA, Mise-Racek N, Eickelberg O. Cigarette smoke alters primary human bronchial epithelial cell differentiation at the air-liquid interface. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8163. doi:10.1038/srep08163

42. Sokolowska M, Quesniaux VFJ, Akdis CA, Chung KF, Ryffel B, Togbe D. Acute respiratory barrier disruption by ozone exposure in mice. Front Immunol. 2019;10:2169. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2019.02169

43. Bromberg PA, Ranga V, Stutts MJ. Effects of ozone on airway epithelial permeability and ion transport. Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 1991;1991(48):1–22;discussion 23–32.

44. Schamberger AC, Mise N, Jia J, et al. Cigarette smoke-induced disruption of bronchial epithelial tight junctions is prevented by transforming growth factor-beta. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2014;50(6):1040–1052. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2013-0090OC

45. Yamamoto N, Kan OK, Tatsuta M, et al. Incense smoke-induced oxidative stress disrupts tight junctions and bronchial epithelial barrier integrity and induces airway hyperresponsiveness in mouse lungs. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):7222. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86745-7

46. Cao X, Lin H, Muskhelishvili L, Latendresse J, Richter P, Heflich RH. Tight junction disruption by cadmium in an in vitro human airway tissue model. Respir Res. 2015;16:30. doi:10.1186/s12931-015-0191-9

47. Cullinan P, Harris JM, Newman Taylor AJ, et al. An outbreak of asthma in a modern detergent factory. Lancet. 2000;356(9245):1899–1900. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(00)03264-5

48. Hole AM, Draper A, Jolliffe G, Cullinan P, Jones M, Taylor AJ. Occupational asthma caused by bacillary amylase used in the detergent industry. Occup Environ Med. 2000;57(12):840–842. doi:10.1136/oem.57.12.840

49. Xian M, Wawrzyniak P, Ruckert B, et al. Anionic surfactants and commercial detergents decrease tight junction barrier integrity in human keratinocytes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138(3):890–893 e899. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.07.003

50. Wang M, Tan G, Eljaszewicz A, et al. Laundry detergents and detergent residue after rinsing directly disrupt tight junction barrier integrity in human bronchial epithelial cells. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;143(5):1892–1903. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2018.11.016

51. Schleimer RP, Berdnikovs S. Etiology of epithelial barrier dysfunction in patients with type 2 inflammatory diseases. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(6):1752–1761. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.04.010

52. Heijink IH, Kuchibhotla VNS, Roffel MP, et al. Epithelial cell dysfunction, a major driver of asthma development. Allergy. 2020;75(8):1902–1917. doi:10.1111/all.14421

53. Hackett TL, Singhera GK, Shaheen F, et al. Intrinsic phenotypic differences of asthmatic epithelium and its inflammatory responses to respiratory syncytial virus and air pollution. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2011;45(5):1090–1100. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2011-0031OC

54. Soyka MB, Wawrzyniak P, Eiwegger T, et al. Defective epithelial barrier in chronic rhinosinusitis: the regulation of tight junctions by IFN-gamma and IL-4. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(5):1087–1096 e1010. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2012.05.052

55. Wawrzyniak P, Wawrzyniak M, Wanke K, et al. Regulation of bronchial epithelial barrier integrity by type 2 cytokines and histone deacetylases in asthmatic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(1):93–103. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.03.050

56. Xiao C, Puddicombe SM, Field S, et al. Defective epithelial barrier function in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;128(3):549–556 e541–512. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2011.05.038

57. Blume C, Swindle EJ, Dennison P, et al. Barrier responses of human bronchial epithelial cells to grass pollen exposure. Eur Respir J. 2013;42(1):87–97. doi:10.1183/09031936.00075612

58. de Boer WI, Sharma HS, Baelemans SM, Hoogsteden HC, Lambrecht BN, Braunstahl GJ. Altered expression of epithelial junctional proteins in atopic asthma: possible role in inflammation. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2008;86(3):105–112. doi:10.1139/Y08-004

59. Hackett TL, de Bruin HG, Shaheen F, et al. Caveolin-1 controls airway epithelial barrier function. Implications for asthma. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2013;49(4):662–671. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2013-0124OC

60. Steelant B, Farre R, Wawrzyniak P, et al. Impaired barrier function in patients with house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis is accompanied by decreased occludin and zonula occludens-1 expression. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(4):1043–1053 e1045. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.050

61. Sweerus K, Lachowicz-Scroggins M, Gordon E, et al. Claudin-18 deficiency is associated with airway epithelial barrier dysfunction and asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;139(1):72–81 e71. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2016.02.035

62. Hackett TL. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the pathophysiology of airway remodelling in asthma. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;12(1):53–59. doi:10.1097/ACI.0b013e32834ec6eb

63. Yang J, Antin P, Berx G, et al. Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(6):341–352. doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0237-9

64. John M. Eisenberg Center for Clinical Decisions and Communications Science. Omega-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: a review of the research for adults. In: Comparative Effectiveness Review Summary Guides for Consumers. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005.

65. Reuter S, Martin H, Beckert H, et al. The Wnt/beta-catenin pathway attenuates experimental allergic airway disease. J Immunol. 2014;193(2):485–495. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1400013

66. Yao L, Zhao H, Tang H, et al. Blockade of beta-catenin signaling attenuates toluene diisocyanate-induced experimental asthma. Allergy. 2017;72(4):579–589. doi:10.1111/all.13045

67. Vroling AB, Fokkens WJ, van Drunen CM. How epithelial cells detect danger: aiding the immune response. Allergy. 2008;63(9):1110–1123. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.2008.01785.x

68. Wills-Karp M. Allergen-specific pattern recognition receptor pathways. Curr Opin Immunol. 2010;22(6):777–782. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2010.10.011

69. Laulajainen-Hongisto A, Toppila-Salmi SK, Luukkainen A, Kern R. Airway epithelial dynamics in allergy and related chronic inflammatory airway diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:204. doi:10.3389/fcell.2020.00204

70. Barnes PJ. The cytokine network in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Clin Invest. 2008;118(11):3546–3556. doi:10.1172/JCI36130

71. Kaur K, Bachus H, Lewis C, et al. GM-CSF production by non-classical monocytes controls antagonistic LPS-driven functions in allergic inflammation. Cell Rep. 2021;37(13):110178. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110178

72. Hamilton LM, Torres-Lozano C, Puddicombe SM, et al. The role of the epidermal growth factor receptor in sustaining neutrophil inflammation in severe asthma. Clin Exp Allergy. 2003;33(2):233–240. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2222.2003.01593.x

73. Bayarri MA, Milara J, Estornut C, Cortijo J. Nitric oxide system and bronchial epithelium: more than a barrier. Front Physiol. 2021;12:687381. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.687381

74. Hardiman KM, McNicholas-Bevensee CM, Fortenberry J, et al. Regulation of amiloride-sensitive Na(+) transport by basal nitric oxide. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2004;30(5):720–728. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2003-0325OC

75. Olson N, Greul AK, Hristova M, Bove PF, Kasahara DI, van der Vliet A. Nitric oxide and airway epithelial barrier function: regulation of tight junction proteins and epithelial permeability. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2009;484(2):205–213. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2008.11.027

76. Burgstaller G, Oehrle B, Gerckens M, White ES, Schiller HB, Eickelberg O. The instructive extracellular matrix of the lung: basic composition and alterations in chronic lung disease. Eur Respir J. 2017;50(1):1601805.

77. Lee CG, Ma B, Takyar S, et al. Studies of vascular endothelial growth factor in asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2011;8(6):512–515. doi:10.1513/pats.201102-018MW

78. Lloyd CM, Hessel EM. Functions of T cells in asthma: more than just T(H)2 cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2010;10(12):838–848. doi:10.1038/nri2870

79. Wu CA, Peluso JJ, Zhu L, Lingenheld EG, Walker ST, Puddington L. Bronchial epithelial cells produce IL-5: implications for local immune responses in the airways. Cell Immunol. 2010;264(1):32–41. doi:10.1016/j.cellimm.2010.04.008

80. Martinez FD, Vercelli D. Asthma. Lancet. 2013;382(9901):1360–1372. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61536-6

81. Kau AL, Korenblat PE. Anti-interleukin 4 and 13 for asthma treatment in the era of endotypes. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;14(6):570–575. doi:10.1097/ACI.0000000000000108

82. Sugita K, Steer CA, Martinez-Gonzalez I, et al. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells disrupt bronchial epithelial barrier integrity by targeting tight junctions through IL-13 in asthmatic patients. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141(1):300–310 e311. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.038

83. Tan HT, Hagner S, Ruchti F, et al. Tight junction, mucin, and inflammasome-related molecules are differentially expressed in eosinophilic, mixed, and neutrophilic experimental asthma in mice. Allergy. 2019;74(2):294–307. doi:10.1111/all.13619

84. Major J, Crotta S, Llorian M, et al. Type I and III interferons disrupt lung epithelial repair during recovery from viral infection. Science. 2020;369(6504):712–717. doi:10.1126/science.abc2061

85. Coyne CB, Vanhook MK, Gambling TM, Carson JL, Boucher RC, Johnson LG. Regulation of airway tight junctions by proinflammatory cytokines. Mol Biol Cell. 2002;13(9):3218–3234. doi:10.1091/mbc.e02-03-0134

86. Hardyman MA, Wilkinson E, Martin E, et al. TNF-alpha-mediated bronchial barrier disruption and regulation by src-family kinase activation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(3):665–675 e668. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.03.005

87. Zabner J, Winter MC, Shasby S, Ries D, Shasby DM. Histamine decreases E-cadherin-based adhesion to increase permeability of human airway epithelium. Chest. 2003;123(3 Suppl):385S. doi:10.1378/chest.123.3_suppl.385S

88. Zabner J, Winter M, Excoffon KJ, et al. Histamine alters E-cadherin cell adhesion to increase human airway epithelial permeability. J Appl Physiol. 2003;95(1):394–401. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01134.2002

89. Sanak M. Eicosanoid mediators in the airway inflammation of asthmatic patients: what is new? Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2016;8(6):481–490. doi:10.4168/aair.2016.8.6.481

90. Luster AD, Tager AM. T-cell trafficking in asthma: lipid mediators grease the way. Nat Rev Immunol. 2004;4(9):711–724. doi:10.1038/nri1438

91. Liu MC, Bleecker ER, Lichtenstein LM, et al. Evidence for elevated levels of histamine, prostaglandin D2, and other bronchoconstricting prostaglandins in the airways of subjects with mild asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;142(1):126–132. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/142.1.126

92. Liu MC, Proud D, Lichtenstein LM, et al. Effects of prednisone on the cellular responses and release of cytokines and mediators after segmental allergen challenge of asthmatic subjects. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108(1):29–38. doi:10.1067/mai.2001.116004

93. Alving K, Matran R, Lundberg JM. The possible role of prostaglandin D2 in the long-lasting airways vasodilatation induced by allergen in the sensitized pig. Acta Physiol Scand. 1991;143(1):93–103. doi:10.1111/j.1748-1716.1991.tb09204.x

94. Matsuoka T, Hirata M, Tanaka H, et al. Prostaglandin D2 as a mediator of allergic asthma. Science. 2000;287(5460):2013–2017. doi:10.1126/science.287.5460.2013

95. Mondino C, Ciabattoni G, Koch P, et al. Effects of inhaled corticosteroids on exhaled leukotrienes and prostanoids in asthmatic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114(4):761–767. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.06.054

96. Pavord ID, Ward R, Woltmann G, Wardlaw AJ, Sheller JR, Dworski R. Induced sputum eicosanoid concentrations in asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160(6):1905–1909. doi:10.1164/ajrccm.160.6.9903114

97. Tager AM, Bromley SK, Medoff BD, et al. Leukotriene B4 receptor BLT1 mediates early effector T cell recruitment. Nat Immunol. 2003;4(10):982–990. doi:10.1038/ni970

98. Goodarzi K, Goodarzi M, Tager AM, Luster AD, von Andrian UH. Leukotriene B4 and BLT1 control cytotoxic effector T cell recruitment to inflamed tissues. Nat Immunol. 2003;4(10):965–973. doi:10.1038/ni972

99. Snyder F. Platelet-activating factor: the biosynthetic and catabolic enzymes. Biochem J. 1995;305(Pt 3):689–705. doi:10.1042/bj3050689

100. Schauberger E, Peinhaupt M, Cazares T, Lindsley AW. Lipid mediators of allergic disease: pathways, treatments, and emerging therapeutic targets. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2016;16(7):48. doi:10.1007/s11882-016-0628-3

101. Krishnamoorthy N, Abdulnour RE, Walker KH, Engstrom BD, Levy BD. Specialized proresolving mediators in innate and adaptive immune responses in airway diseases. Physiol Rev. 2018;98(3):1335–1370. doi:10.1152/physrev.00026.2017

102. Serhan CN, Savill J. Resolution of inflammation: the beginning programs the end. Nat Immunol. 2005;6(12):1191–1197. doi:10.1038/ni1276

103. Buckley CD, Gilroy DW, Serhan CN. Proresolving lipid mediators and mechanisms in the resolution of acute inflammation. Immunity. 2014;40(3):315–327. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2014.02.009

104. Levy BD, Bonnans C, Silverman ES, et al. Diminished lipoxin biosynthesis in severe asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2005;172(7):824–830. doi:10.1164/rccm.200410-1413OC

105. Vachier I, Bonnans C, Chavis C, et al. Severe asthma is associated with a loss of LX4, an endogenous anti-inflammatory compound. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;115(1):55–60. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.09.038

106. Ono E, Dutile S, Kazani S, et al. Lipoxin generation is related to soluble epoxide hydrolase activity in severe asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190(8):886–897. doi:10.1164/rccm.201403-0544OC

107. Christie PE, Spur BW, Lee TH. The effects of lipoxin A4 on airway responses in asthmatic subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145(6):1281–1284. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/145.6.1281

108. Kong X, Wu SH, Zhang L, Chen XQ. Pilot application of lipoxin A4 analog and lipoxin A4 receptor agonist in asthmatic children with acute episodes. Exp Ther Med. 2017;14(3):2284–2290. doi:10.3892/etm.2017.4787

109. Steinke JW, Liu L, Huyett P, Negri J, Payne SC, Borish L. Prominent role of IFN-gamma in patients with aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(4):856–865 e851–853. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.05.008

110. Soyombo O, Spur BW, Lee TH. Effects of lipoxin A4 on chemotaxis and degranulation of human eosinophils stimulated by platelet-activating factor and N-formyl-L-methionyl-L-leucyl-L-phenylalanine. Allergy. 1994;49(4):230–234. doi:10.1111/j.1398-9995.1994.tb02654.x

111. Planaguma A, Kazani S, Marigowda G, et al. Airway lipoxin A4 generation and lipoxin A4 receptor expression are decreased in severe asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;178(6):574–582. doi:10.1164/rccm.200801-061OC

112. Bonnans C, Fukunaga K, Levy MA, Levy BD. Lipoxin A(4) regulates bronchial epithelial cell responses to acid injury. Am J Pathol. 2006;168(4):1064–1072. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2006.051056

113. Barnig C, Cernadas M, Dutile S, et al. Lipoxin A4 regulates natural killer cell and type 2 innate lymphoid cell activation in asthma. Sci Transl Med. 2013;5(174):174ra126. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3004812

114. Haworth O, Cernadas M, Yang R, Serhan CN, Levy BD. Resolvin E1 regulates interleukin 23, interferon-gamma and lipoxin A4 to promote the resolution of allergic airway inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2008;9(8):873–879. doi:10.1038/ni.1627

115. Aoki H, Hisada T, Ishizuka T, et al. Resolvin E1 dampens airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in a murine model of asthma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008;367(2):509–515. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2008.01.012

116. Rogerio AP, Haworth O, Croze R, et al. Resolvin D1 and aspirin-triggered resolvin D1 promote resolution of allergic airways responses. J Immunol. 2012;189(4):1983–1991. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1101665

117. Levy BD, Kohli P, Gotlinger K, et al. Protectin D1 is generated in asthma and dampens airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness. J Immunol. 2007;178(1):496–502. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.178.1.496

118. Lin YJ, Flaczyk A, Wolfheimer S, et al. The fusion protein rFlaA:Betv1 modulates DC responses by a p38-MAPK and COX2-dependent secretion of PGE2 from epithelial cells. Cells. 2021;10:12. doi:10.3390/cells10123415

119. Zhou Y, Wang W, Zhao C, et al. Prostaglandin E2 inhibits group 2 innate lymphoid cell activation and allergic airway inflammation through E-prostanoid 4-cyclic adenosine monophosphate signaling. Front Immunol. 2018;9:501. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2018.00501

120. Aggarwal S, Moodley YP, Thompson PJ, Misso NL. Prostaglandin E2 and cysteinyl leukotriene concentrations in sputum: association with asthma severity and eosinophilic inflammation. Clin Exp Allergy. 2010;40(1):85–93. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03386.x

121. Pavord ID, Wong CS, Williams J, Tattersfield AE. Effect of inhaled prostaglandin E2 on allergen-induced asthma. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993;148(1):87–90. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/148.1.87

122. Takahashi Y, Tokuoka S, Masuda T, et al. Augmentation of allergic inflammation in prostanoid IP receptor deficient mice. Br J Pharmacol. 2002;137(3):315–322. doi:10.1038/sj.bjp.0704872

123. Nagao K, Tanaka H, Komai M, Masuda T, Narumiya S, Nagai H. Role of prostaglandin I2 in airway remodeling induced by repeated allergen challenge in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2003;29(3pt 1):314–320. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2003-0035OC

124. Yamabayashi C, Koya T, Kagamu H, et al. A novel prostacyclin agonist protects against airway hyperresponsiveness and remodeling in mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2012;47(2):170–177. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2011-0350OC

125. Tripathi P, Awasthi S, Husain N, Prasad R, Mishra V. Increased expression of ADAM33 protein in asthmatic patients as compared to non-asthmatic controls. Indian J Med Res. 2013;137(3):507–514.

126. Biswas S. Role of PCDH 1 gene in the development of childhood asthma and other related phenotypes: a literature review. Cureus. 2018;10(9):e3360. doi:10.7759/cureus.3360

127. Koppelman GH, Meyers DA, Howard TD, et al. Identification of PCDH1 as a novel susceptibility gene for bronchial hyperresponsiveness. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009;180(10):929–935. doi:10.1164/rccm.200810-1621OC

128. Bonnelykke K, Coleman AT, Evans MD, et al. Cadherin-related family member 3 genetics and rhinovirus C respiratory illnesses. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018;197(5):589–594. doi:10.1164/rccm.201705-1021OC

129. Everman JL, Sajuthi S, Saef B, et al. Functional genomics of CDHR3 confirms its role in HRV-C infection and childhood asthma exacerbations. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;144(4):962–971. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2019.01.052

130. Chung LP, Baltic S, Ferreira M, Temple S, Waterer G, Thompson PJ. Beta2 adrenergic receptor (ADRbeta2) haplotype pair (2/4) is associated with severe asthma. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e93695. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093695

131. Biagini Myers JM, Martin LJ, Kovacic MB, et al. Epistasis between serine protease inhibitor Kazal-type 5 (SPINK5) and thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) genes contributes to childhood asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;134(4):891–899 e893. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.037

132. Moffatt MF, Gut IG, Demenais F, et al. A large-scale, consortium-based genomewide association study of asthma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(13):1211–1221. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0906312

133. Saikumar Jayalatha AK, Hesse L, Ketelaar ME, Koppelman GH, Nawijn MC. The central role of IL-33/IL-1RL1 pathway in asthma: from pathogenesis to intervention. Pharmacol Ther. 2021;225:107847. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2021.107847

134. Gordon ED, Palandra J, Wesolowska-Andersen A, et al. IL1RL1 asthma risk variants regulate airway type 2 inflammation. JCI Insight. 2016;1(14):e87871. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.87871

135. Yang R, Tan M, Xu J, Zhao X. Investigating the regulatory role of ORMDL3 in airway barrier dysfunction using in vivo and in vitro models. Int J Mol Med. 2019;44(2):535–548. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2019.4233

136. James B, Milstien S, Spiegel S. ORMDL3 and allergic asthma: from physiology to pathology. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;144(3):634–640. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2019.07.023

137. Laura G, Liu Y, Fernandes K, et al. ORMDL3 regulates poly I:C induced inflammatory responses in airway epithelial cells. BMC Pulm Med. 2021;21(1):167. doi:10.1186/s12890-021-01496-5

138. Zhang YM. Orosomucoid-like protein 3, rhinovirus and asthma. World J Crit Care Med. 2021;10(5):170–182. doi:10.5492/wjccm.v10.i5.170

139. Liu Y, Bochkov YA, Eickhoff JC, et al. Orosomucoid-like 3 supports rhinovirus replication in human epithelial cells. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2020;62(6):783–792. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2019-0237OC

140. Yu F, Sun Y, Yu J, et al. ORMDL3 is associated with airway remodeling in asthma via the ERK/MMP-9 pathway. Mol Med Rep. 2017;15(5):2969–2976. doi:10.3892/mmr.2017.6413

141. Anthoni M, Wang G, Leino MS, Lauerma AI, Alenius HT, Wolff HJ. Smad3 -signalling and Th2 cytokines in normal mouse airways and in a mouse model of asthma. Int J Biol Sci. 2007;3(7):477–485. doi:10.7150/ijbs.3.477

142. Fan Q, Jian Y. MiR-203a-3p regulates TGF-beta1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in asthma by regulating Smad3 pathway through SIX1. Biosci Rep. 2020;40:2. doi:10.1042/BSR20192645

143. Lund RJ, Osmala M, Malonzo M, et al. Atopic asthma after rhinovirus-induced wheezing is associated with DNA methylation change in the SMAD3 gene promoter. Allergy. 2018;73(8):1735–1740. doi:10.1111/all.13473

144. Gibbs JD, Ornoff DM, Igo HA, Zeng JY, Imani F. Cell cycle arrest by transforming growth factor beta1 enhances replication of respiratory syncytial virus in lung epithelial cells. J Virol. 2009;83(23):12424–12431. doi:10.1128/JVI.00806-09

145. Werder RB, Ullah MA, Rahman MM, et al. Targeting the P2Y13 receptor suppresses IL-33 and HMGB1 release and ameliorates experimental asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;205(3):300–312. doi:10.1164/rccm.202009-3686OC

146. Sordillo JE, Kelly R, Bunyavanich S, et al. Genome-wide expression profiles identify potential targets for gene-environment interactions in asthma severity. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;136(4):885–892 e882. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2015.02.035

147. Alashkar Alhamwe B, Miethe S, Pogge von Strandmann E, Potaczek DP, Garn H. Epigenetic regulation of airway epithelium immune functions in asthma. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1747. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01747

148. Sugita K, Soyka MB, Wawrzyniak P, et al. Outside-in hypothesis revisited: the role of microbial, epithelial, and immune interactions. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2020;125(5):517–527. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2020.05.016

149. Lee AY. The role of microRNAs in epidermal barrier. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21:16.

150. Potaczek DP, Harb H, Michel S, Alhamwe BA, Renz H, Tost J. Epigenetics and allergy: from basic mechanisms to clinical applications. Epigenomics. 2017;9(4):539–571. doi:10.2217/epi-2016-0162

151. Kabesch M, Tost J. Recent findings in the genetics and epigenetics of asthma and allergy. Semin Immunopathol. 2020;42(1):43–60. doi:10.1007/s00281-019-00777-w

152. Wang CM, Chang CB, Wu SF. Differential DNA methylation in allergen-specific immunotherapy of asthma. Cell Mol Immunol. 2020;17(9):1017–1018. doi:10.1038/s41423-020-0476-x

153. Wawrzyniak P, Krawczyk K, Acharya S, et al. Inhibition of CpG methylation improves the barrier integrity of bronchial epithelial cells in asthma. Allergy. 2021;76(6):1864–1868. doi:10.1111/all.14667

154. Vermeulen CJ, Xu CJ, Vonk JM, et al. Differential DNA methylation in bronchial biopsies between persistent asthma and asthma in remission. Eur Respir J. 2020;55:2. doi:10.1183/13993003.01280-2019

155. Cardenas A, Fadadu RP, Van Der Laan L, et al. Controlled human exposures to diesel exhaust: a human epigenome-wide experiment of target bronchial epithelial cells. Environ Epigenet. 2021;7(1):dvab003. doi:10.1093/eep/dvab003

156. Qin W, Brands X, Van’t Veer C, et al. Bronchial epithelial DNA methyltransferase 3b dampens pulmonary immune responses during Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(4):e1009491. doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1009491

157. Liberti DC, Zepp JA, Bartoni CA, et al. Dnmt1 is required for proximal-distal patterning of the lung endoderm and for restraining alveolar type 2 cell fate. Dev Biol. 2019;454(2):108–117. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2019.06.019

158. Lawlor L, Yang XB. Harnessing the HDAC-histone deacetylase enzymes, inhibitors and how these can be utilised in tissue engineering. Int J Oral Sci. 2019;11(2):20. doi:10.1038/s41368-019-0053-2

159. Steelant B, Wawrzyniak P, Martens K, et al. Blocking histone deacetylase activity as a novel target for epithelial barrier defects in patients with allergic rhinitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2019;144(5):1242–1253 e1247. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2019.04.027

160. Ito K, Yamamura S, Essilfie-Quaye S, et al. Histone deacetylase 2-mediated deacetylation of the glucocorticoid receptor enables NF-kappaB suppression. J Exp Med. 2006;203(1):7–13. doi:10.1084/jem.20050466

161. Wei W, Chen W, He N. HDAC4 induces the development of asthma by increasing Slug-upregulated CXCL12 expression through KLF5 deacetylation. J Transl Med. 2021;19(1):258. doi:10.1186/s12967-021-02812-7

162. Ren Y, Su X, Kong L, et al. Therapeutic effects of histone deacetylase inhibitors in a murine asthma model. Inflamm Res. 2016;65(12):995–1008. doi:10.1007/s00011-016-0984-4

163. Wang J, Cui M, Sun F, et al. HDAC inhibitor sodium butyrate prevents allergic rhinitis and alters lncRNA and mRNA expression profiles in the nasal mucosa of mice. Int J Mol Med. 2020;45(4):1150–1162. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2020.4489

164. Sekiyama A, Gon Y, Terakado M, et al. Glucocorticoids enhance airway epithelial barrier integrity. Int Immunopharmacol. 2012;12(2):350–357. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2011.12.006

165. Rimmer C, Hetelekides S, Eliseeva SI, Georas SN, Veazey JM, Deli MA. Budesonide promotes airway epithelial barrier integrity following double-stranded RNA challenge. PLoS One. 2021;16(12):e0260706. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260706

166. Ma S, Xian M, Wang Y, Wang C, Zhang L. Budesonide repairs decreased barrier integrity of eosinophilic nasal polyp epithelial cells caused by PM2.5. Clin Transl Allergy. 2021;11(5):e12019. doi:10.1002/clt2.12029

167. Doulaptsi M, Wils T, Hellings PW, et al. Mometasone furoate and fluticasone furoate are equally effective in restoring nasal epithelial barrier dysfunction in allergic rhinitis. World Allergy Organ J. 2021;14(9):100585. doi:10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100585

168. Qian J, Xu Y, Yu Z. Budesonide and calcitriol synergistically inhibit airway remodeling in asthmatic mice. Can Respir J. 2018;2018:5259240. doi:10.1155/2018/5259240

169. Southam DS, Ellis R, Wattie J, Young S, Inman MD. Budesonide prevents but does not reverse sustained airway hyperresponsiveness in mice. Eur Respir J. 2008;32(4):970–978. doi:10.1183/09031936.00125307

170. Bateman ED, Boushey HA, Bousquet J, et al. Can guideline-defined asthma control be achieved? The Gaining Optimal Asthma Control study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(8):836–844. doi:10.1164/rccm.200401-033OC

171. Kardas G, Kuna P, Panek M. Biological therapies of severe asthma and their possible effects on airway remodeling. Front Immunol. 2020;11:1134. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.01134

172. Riccio AM, Dal Negro RW, Micheletto C, et al. Omalizumab modulates bronchial reticular basement membrane thickness and eosinophil infiltration in severe persistent allergic asthma patients. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2012;25(2):475–484. doi:10.1177/039463201202500217

173. Zastrzezynska W, Przybyszowski M, Bazan-Socha S, et al. Omalizumab may decrease the thickness of the reticular basement membrane and fibronectin deposit in the bronchial mucosa of severe allergic asthmatics. J Asthma. 2020;57(5):468–477. doi:10.1080/02770903.2019.1585872

174. Hoshino M, Ohtawa J. Effects of adding omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin E antibody, on airway wall thickening in asthma. Respiration. 2012;83(6):520–528. doi:10.1159/000334701

175. Laviolette M, Gossage DL, Gauvreau G, et al. Effects of benralizumab on airway eosinophils in asthmatic patients with sputum eosinophilia. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(5):1086–1096 e1085. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2013.05.020

176. Bagnasco D, Ferrando M, Varricchi G, Passalacqua G, Canonica GW. A critical evaluation of anti-IL-13 and anti-IL-4 strategies in severe asthma. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2016;170(2):122–131. doi:10.1159/000447692

177. Turkeli A, Yilmaz O, Karaman M, et al. Anti-VEGF treatment suppresses remodeling factors and restores epithelial barrier function through the E-cadherin/beta-catenin signaling axis in experimental asthma models. Exp Ther Med. 2021;22(1):689. doi:10.3892/etm.2021.10121

178. Globinska A, Boonpiyathad T, Satitsuksanoa P, et al. Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy: diverse mechanisms of immune tolerance to allergens. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018;121(3):306–312. doi:10.1016/j.anai.2018.06.026

179. Shamji MH, Layhadi JA, Sharif H, Penagos M, Durham SR. Immunological responses and biomarkers for allergen-specific immunotherapy against inhaled allergens. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021;9(5):1769–1778. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.029

180. Akdis CA, Akdis M. Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127(1):18–27; quiz 28–19. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.11.030

181. Yuan X, Wang J, Li Y, et al. Allergy immunotherapy restores airway epithelial barrier dysfunction through suppressing IL-25 -induced endoplasmic reticulum stress in asthma. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):7950. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-26221-x

182. Hesse L, Van ieperen N, Habraken C, et al. Subcutaneous immunotherapy with purified Der p1 and 2 suppresses type 2 immunity in a murine asthma model. Allergy. 2018;73(4):862–874. doi:10.1111/all.13382

183. Hoshino M, Akitsu K, Kubota K. Effect of sublingual immunotherapy on airway inflammation and airway wall thickness in allergic asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(8):2804–2811. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2019.06.003

184. Zissler UM, Jakwerth CA, Guerth F, et al. Allergen-specific immunotherapy induces the suppressive secretoglobin 1A1 in cells of the lower airways. Allergy. 2021;76(8):2461–2474. doi:10.1111/all.14756

185. Wawrzyniak M, Groeger D, Frei R, et al. Spermidine and spermine exert protective effects within the lung. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2021;9(4):e00837. doi:10.1002/prp2.837

186. Sussan TE, Gajghate S, Chatterjee S, et al. Nrf2 reduces allergic asthma in mice through enhanced airway epithelial cytoprotective function. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2015;309(1):L27–36. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00398.2014

187. Angelina A, Martin-Fontecha M, Ruckert B, et al. The cannabinoid WIN55212-2 restores rhinovirus-induced epithelial barrier disruption. Allergy. 2021;76(6):1900–1902. doi:10.1111/all.14707

188. Evans MJ, Van Winkle LS, Fanucchi MV, Plopper CG. Cellular and molecular characteristics of basal cells in airway epithelium. Exp Lung Res. 2001;27(5):401–415. doi:10.1080/019021401300317125

189. Hewitt RJ, Lloyd CM. Regulation of immune responses by the airway epithelial cell landscape. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(6):347–362. doi:10.1038/s41577-020-00477-9

190. Yang Y, Riccio P, Schotsaert M, et al. Spatial-temporal lineage restrictions of embryonic p63(+) progenitors establish distinct stem cell pools in adult airways. Dev Cell. 2018;44(6):752–761 e754. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2018.03.001

191. Morrisey EE. Basal cells in lung development and repair. Dev Cell. 2018;44(6):653–654. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2018.03.004

192. Jakiela B, Brockman-Schneider R, Amineva S, Lee WM, Gern JE. Basal cells of differentiated bronchial epithelium are more susceptible to rhinovirus infection. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2008;38(5):517–523. doi:10.1165/rcmb.2007-0050OC

193. Bukowy-Bieryllo Z. Long-term differentiating primary human airway epithelial cell cultures: how far are we? Cell Commun Signal. 2021;19(1):63. doi:10.1186/s12964-021-00740-z

194. Knoop KA, Newberry RD. Goblet cells: multifaceted players in immunity at mucosal surfaces. Mucosal Immunol. 2018;11(6):1551–1557. doi:10.1038/s41385-018-0039-y

195. Rogers DF. The airway goblet cell. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2003;35(1):1–6. doi:10.1016/S1357-2725(02)00083-3

196. Rogers DF. Airway goblet cell hyperplasia in asthma: hypersecretory and anti-inflammatory? Clin Exp Allergy. 2002;32(8):1124–1127. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2002.01474.x

197. Jackson AD. Airway goblet-cell mucus secretion. Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2001;22(1):39–45. doi:10.1016/S0165-6147(00)01600-X

198. Yang S, Yu M. Role of goblet cells in intestinal barrier and mucosal immunity. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:3171–3183. doi:10.2147/JIR.S318327

199. Rokicki W, Rokicki M, Wojtacha J, Dzeljijli A. The role and importance of club cells (Clara cells) in the pathogenesis of some respiratory diseases. Kardiochir Torakochirurgia Pol. 2016;13(1):26–30. doi:10.5114/kitp.2016.58961

200. Broeckaert F, Bernard A. Clara cell secretory protein (CC16): characteristics and perspectives as lung peripheral biomarker. Clin Exp Allergy. 2000;30(4):469–475. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00760.x

201. Wang SX, Liu P, Wei MT, et al. Roles of serum Clara cell protein 16 and surfactant protein-D in the early diagnosis and progression of silicosis. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49(8):834–839. doi:10.1097/JOM.0b013e318124a927

202. Pilon AL. Rationale for the development of recombinant human CC10 as a therapeutic for inflammatory and fibrotic disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2000;923:280–299. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2000.tb05536.x

203. Tata PR, Mou H, Pardo-Saganta A, et al. Dedifferentiation of committed epithelial cells into stem cells in vivo. Nature. 2013;503(7475):218–223. doi:10.1038/nature12777

204. Morimoto M, Nishinakamura R, Saga Y, Kopan R. Different assemblies of Notch receptors coordinate the distribution of the major bronchial Clara, ciliated and neuroendocrine cells. Development. 2012;139(23):4365–4373. doi:10.1242/dev.083840

205. Guseh JS, Bores SA, Stanger BZ, et al. Notch signaling promotes airway mucous metaplasia and inhibits alveolar development. Development. 2009;136(10):1751–1759. doi:10.1242/dev.029249

206. Thomas B, Rutman A, Hirst RA, et al. Ciliary dysfunction and ultrastructural abnormalities are features of severe asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(4):722–729 e722. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.05.046

207. Tilley AE, Walters MS, Shaykhiev R, Crystal RG. Cilia dysfunction in lung disease. Annu Rev Physiol. 2015;77:379–406. doi:10.1146/annurev-physiol-021014-071931

208. Van Lommel A. Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells (PNEC) and neuroepithelial bodies (NEB): chemoreceptors and regulators of lung development. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2001;2(2):171–176. doi:10.1053/prrv.2000.0126

209. Noguchi M, Furukawa KT, Morimoto M. Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells: physiology, tissue homeostasis and disease. Dis Model Mech. 2020;13:12. doi:10.1242/dmm.046920

210. Kobayashi Y, Tata PR. Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells: sensors and sentinels of the lung. Dev Cell. 2018;45(4):425–426. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2018.05.009

211. Johnson DE, Georgieff MK. Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells. Their secretory products and their potential roles in health and chronic lung disease in infancy. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989;140(6):1807–1812. doi:10.1164/ajrccm/140.6.1807

212. Sui P, Wiesner DL, Xu J, et al. Pulmonary neuroendocrine cells amplify allergic asthma responses. Science. 2018;360:6393. doi:10.1126/science.aan8546

213. Goldfarbmuren KC, Jackson ND, Sajuthi SP, et al. Dissecting the cellular specificity of smoking effects and reconstructing lineages in the human airway epithelium. Nat Commun. 2020;11(1):2485. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16239-z

214. Montoro DT, Haber AL, Biton M, et al. A revised airway epithelial hierarchy includes CFTR-expressing ionocytes. Nature. 2018;560(7718):319–324. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0393-7

215. Plasschaert LW, Zilionis R, Choo-Wing R, et al. A single-cell atlas of the airway epithelium reveals the CFTR-rich pulmonary ionocyte. Nature. 2018;560(7718):377–381. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0394-6

216. Ruan YC, Wang Y, Da Silva N, et al. CFTR interacts with ZO-1 to regulate tight junction assembly and epithelial differentiation through the ZONAB pathway. J Cell Sci. 2014;127(Pt 20):4396–4408. doi:10.1242/jcs.148098

217. Shah VS, Meyerholz DK, Tang XX, et al. Airway acidification initiates host defense abnormalities in cystic fibrosis mice. Science. 2016;351(6272):503–507. doi:10.1126/science.aad5589

218. Vieira Braga FA, Kar G, Berg M, et al. A cellular census of human lungs identifies novel cell states in health and in asthma. Nat Med. 2019;25(7):1153–1163. doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0468-5

219. Deprez M, Zaragosi LE, Truchi M, et al. A single-cell atlas of the human healthy airways. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;202(12):1636–1645. doi:10.1164/rccm.201911-2199OC

220. Schneider C, O’Leary CE, Locksley RM. Regulation of immune responses by tuft cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2019;19(9):584–593. doi:10.1038/s41577-019-0176-x

221. Krasteva G, Canning BJ, Hartmann P, et al. Cholinergic chemosensory cells in the trachea regulate breathing. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(23):9478–9483. doi:10.1073/pnas.1019418108

222. O’Leary CE, Schneider C, Locksley RM. Tuft cells-systemically dispersed sensory epithelia integrating immune and neural circuitry. Annu Rev Immunol. 2019;37:47–72. doi:10.1146/annurev-immunol-042718-041505

223. Kohanski MA, Workman AD, Patel NN, et al. Solitary chemosensory cells are a primary epithelial source of IL-25 in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;142(2):460–469 e467. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2018.03.019

224. Patel NN, Kohanski MA, Maina IW, et al. Solitary chemosensory cells producing interleukin-25 and group-2 innate lymphoid cells are enriched in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2018;8(8):900–906. doi:10.1002/alr.22142

Creative Commons License © 2022 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.