The Effect of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Neuropsychological Symptoms in Chinese Early Alzheimer’s Disease Population
Authors Shi Q, Zhou F, Mei J, Yang H, Li H
Received 29 November 2019
Accepted for publication 1 March 2020
Published 26 March 2020 Volume 2020:16 Pages 829—836
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Jun Chen
Qianqian Shi, Faying Zhou, Jing Mei, Haimei Yang, Huiyun Li
Department of Neurology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Huiyun Li
Department of Neurology, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, People’s Republic of China
Tel +86 23 68757851
Fax +86 23 68711956
Objective: To explore the effect of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) on the development of neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS) in early Alzheimer’s disease (AD).
Methods: From September 2017 to March 2019, a cross-sectional study was conducted on the clinical data of 158 early AD patients over 65 years old in the Department of Neurology of Daping Hospital. All early stage of AD patients were divided into early stage of AD with NPS group and early stage of AD without NPS group according to the presence or absence of NPS. Clinical data of age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking and alcohol consumption, history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, white matter leisure (WML) and T2DM, MMSE, CDR and NPI-Q scores were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the relationship between T2DM and NPS in early AD.
Results: Compared with the early stage of AD group without NPS, the early stage of AD group with NPS was older, the proportion of women was higher, the proportion of T2DM, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and WML was higher, and the MMSE score was lower (P< 0.05). T2DM was an independent risk factor for NPS in early stage of AD patients (OR 3.48, 95% CI 2.91– 3.84). The incidence of T2DM in AD patients with depression, anxiety, nighttime behavioral disturbances, and appetite disturbances was significantly higher than in AD patients without these symptoms. T2DM was an independent risk factor of depression (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.71– 2.38), anxiety (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.38– 1.97), nighttime behavioral disturbances (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.75– 2.13) and appetite disturbances (OR 1.62, 95% CI 1.33– 1.94) in early AD patients.
Conclusion: T2DM was an important independent risk factor for NPS in early AD, which promotes the occurrence of depression, anxiety, nighttime behavioral disturbances and appetite disturbances in early AD.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, type 2 diabetes, neuropsychiatric symptoms
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a common disease that causes dementia, and by 2050 there will be more than 100 million AD patients worldwide.1 Cognitive decline is the core symptom of AD, but most AD patients are often accompanied by neuropsychiatric symptoms (NPS), and some patients even seek treatment at the first time because of NPS. In recent years, more attention has been paid to NPS of AD patients, but the early stage of AD patients may have different and atypical NPS, which are easily overlooked clinically. Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic metabolic disease mainly manifested as hyperglycemia, characterized by insulin resistance and relative reduction of insulin. Studies have found that T2DM often causes a variety of NPS, such as anxiety and depression which are about twice as common as normal people.2 When AD patients are combined with T2DM, their pathological changes are aggravated and their cognitive impairment is accelerated.3 It is not clear whether T2DM has any effect on the occurrence of NPS in the early stage of AD patients. This study provides an important clinical basis for the prevention and treatment of NPS by analyzing the risk factors associated with NPS in the early stage of AD patients.
Materials and Methods
Continuously collected 158 early stage of AD patients who were treated at Daping Hospital from September 2017 to March 2019. Inclusion criteria: 1) age ≥ 65 years; 2) diagnosis of AD; 3) clinical dementia rating (CDR) score of 0.5 or 1; 4) completion of the Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q) assessment; 5) completion of laboratory inspection and imaging examination. Exclusion criteria: 1) a clear history of stroke, brain trauma, and intracranial tumors; 2) a clear history of psychosis; 3) non-AD dementia patients; 4) other neurological diseases that may affect cognition or cause NPS; 5) unfinished MMSE, CDR or NPI-Q assessment. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Daping Hospital of the Army Medical University (numbered: Medical Research (2018) No. 60), and all participants or guardians provided written informed consent to be included in this study, and that this study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Clinical Data Collection
Age, gender, BMI, smoking and alcohol consumption, history of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, WML, T2DM and MMSE, CDR and NPI-Q scores were collected.
Diagnostic Criteria for AD
The diagnostic criteria for AD are based on the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association diagnostic criteria (NINCDS-ADRDA criteria).4 Vascular dementia and mixed dementia were excluded using the Hachinski Ischemic Scale (HIS score ≥ 4).5 Lewy body dementia was excluded using by the fourth edition of the Lewy Body Dementia Diagnosis and Management Consensus.6 The use of frontotemporal dementia clinical diagnostic guidelines to exclude frontotemporal dementia.7
Diagnosis of the Early Stage of AD
The CDR scale was evaluated in AD patients, and the CDR score of 0.5 or 1 was defined as the early stage of AD.8 Scoring criteria: Memory (M) is the main item and the others are the secondary items. CDR=M, if at least three secondary items scores are the same as the M scores; CDR=most secondary items score when three or more secondary items are scored higher or lower than the M score; three secondary items are scored on one side of M, two secondary items are scored on the other side of M, CDR=M; when M=0.5, if at least three other items are scored 1 or above, CDR=1; when M=0.5, the CDR cannot be 0, only 0.5 or 1.
Assessment of Cognitive Function
MMSE is used to measure cognitive function. The boundary score of MMSE was defined as <17 (illiteracy), <20 (primary school), <24 (middle school and higher). If the MMSE scale is lower or equal to the normal threshold, it will be judged as cognitive impairment, and the higher threshold is normal.9
Assessment of NPS
NPS were assessed based on the NPI-Q questionnaire:10 NPI-Q consisted of 12 items (delusions, hallucinations, agitation, depression, anxiety, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor behaviors, nighttime behavioral disturbances, appetite disturbances), the insider indicates whether each symptom is present (yes or no). For each “yes” response, the person is asked to assess the severity (1–3) and frequency (1–4) of the symptoms, yielding a composite symptom domain score (frequency×severity). Frequency and severity rating scales have defined anchor points to enhance the reliability of caregiver responses.
T2DM Diagnosis and Exclusion Criteria
T2DM was based on the 2019 American Diabetes Diagnostic Criteria (fasting blood glucose ≥7.0mmol/l or OGTT 2 hr blood glucose ≥11.1mmol/l or HbAlc≥6.5%).11 Exclude type 1 diabetes and diabetes caused by other causes such as monogenic diabetes syndrome, exocrine pancreatic disease, drugs or chemically induced diabetes.
Observation Projects and Grouping
The early stage of AD patients was divided into groups with and without NPS according to the patient’s NPI-Q score. If any of the NPI-Q 12 items receives a “yes” response, the patient is considered to be accompanied by NPS. Observed whether there were differences in age, gender, BMI, smoking and alcohol consumption, etc. between the two groups, and whether there were differences in blood glucose, blood pressure, blood lipids and other indicators. To explore the relationship between T2DM and NPS in the early stage of AD patients.
Data analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 statistical software, and the usage rate of the count data was expressed. The chi-square test was used for comparison between the two groups. The measurement data obeying the normal distribution are represented by x±S, and the t-test is used for comparison between the two groups, and the non-parametric test is used without the normal distribution. Multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between T2DM and NPS in the early stage of AD patients. The difference was statistically significant with P<0.05.
Baseline Characteristics of Patients with Early Stage of AD
Compared with the early stage of AD group without NPS, the early stage of AD group with NPS was older, the proportion of women was higher, the proportion of T2DM, hypertension, hyperlipidemia and WML was higher, and the MMSE score was lower (P< 0.05). However, there were no significant differences in smoking history, drinking history, body mass index (BMI), and CDR scores between the two groups (P>0.05) (Table 1).
Table 1 Baseline Characteristics of the Early AD Patients with or Without NPS
The Independent Risk Factors for NPS in Early AD Patients
In the multivariate logistic regression analysis model, after adjusting for age, gender, T2DM, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and WML, T2DM (OR: 3.48, 95% CI: 2.91–3.84), hypertension (OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.31–1.89) and WML (OR: 3.13, 95% CI: 2.75–3.52) were significantly associated with the early stage of AD with NPS, and T2DM had the highest risk factor (Table 2).
Table 2 The Independent Risk Factors for NPS in Early AD Patients (Logistic Regression Analysis)
The Incidence of T2DM in AD Patients with Various Psychiatric Symptoms
We also calculated the incidence of T2DM in various neuropsychiatric symptoms, and the results showed that the incidence of T2DM in AD patients with depression, anxiety, nighttime behavioral disturbances, and appetite disturbances was significantly higher than in AD patients without these symptoms (P< 0.01). The incidence of T2DM in AD patients with agitation is higher than in AD patients without agitation (P< 0.05) (Figure 1).
Figure 1 Incidence of T2DM in AD patients with various psychiatric symptoms. Abbreviations: AD, Alzheimer’s disease; T2DM, type 2 diabetes; NPS, neuropsychological symptoms.
The Relationship Between T2DM and Various NPS in Early AD Disease
In the multi-factor logistic regression analysis model, after adjusting the relevant confounding factors, T2DM was an independent risk factor for depression (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.71–2.38), anxiety (OR: 1.69, 95% CI: 1.38–1.97), nighttime behavioral disturbances (OR: 1.95, 95% CI: 1.75–2.13), and appetite disturbances (OR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.33–1.94) in the early stage of AD patients. It was not an independent risk factor delusions, hallucinations, agitation, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor behaviors (Table 3).
Table 3 The Relationship Between T2DM and Various NPS in Early AD Disease
This different type of non-cognitive disorder, also known as behavioral and psychological symptoms in dementia or NPS, affects approximately 90% of AD patients.12 Previous studies have shown that with advancing cognitive decline in AD patients, neuropsychiatric symptoms include apathy, depression, agitation, and aggression, to psychosis. With the gradual decline in cognition and function in patients with AD dementia, the presence of NPS is thought to represent neurodegeneration in the nervous system.13–16 However, different neuropsychiatric measurements and clinical definitions have blurred the true incidence and progression of NPS in AD patients. Our results showed that T2DM, hypertension and WML were significantly correlated with the development of NPS in patients with early AD, and T2DM had the highest risk of promoting the development of NPS in patients with early AD. And we also found that the incidence of T2DM in AD patients with depression, anxiety, nighttime behavioral disturbances, and appetite disturbances were significantly higher than in AD patients without these symptoms. It was further found that T2DM is an independent risk factor for anxiety, depression, nighttime behavioral disturbances and appetite disturbances in AD patients, rather than independent risk factors for delusions, hallucinations, agitation, euphoria, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor behaviors.
Eustace et al13 found that the NPS symptoms of AD trend into 3 “phases”: first, irritability, depression, and nighttime behavioral disturbances; then, anxiety, appetite disturbances, agitation and apathy; finally, excitement, dyskinesia, hallucinations, delusion and disinhibition. More serious non-cognitive symptoms, such as excitation, dyskinesia, hallucinations, delusions and disinhibition appear in progressive ad dementia. Our results showed that T2DM is a risk factor for anxiety, depression, nighttime behavioral disturbances and appetite disturbances in early AD patients, which is consistent with the above views. Aβ load, neuron apoptosis and glucocorticoid level rise are all the possible mechanisms of various NPS in early AD. The progressive deposition of Aβ and local neurodegeneration of subcortical structure affects the activity of limbic system and neocortex,17 destroy the brain circuit involved in emotional response;18 the deposition of Aβ weakens the inhibition of hippocampus on HPA axis, and increases the level of glucocorticoids.19 The amyloid peptide of T2DM can aggregate or form a molecular hybrid with Aβ, participate in the formation of amyloid plaque, promote the abnormal modification of tau, and damage the activity of neurons;20,21 hyperglycemia and insulin resistance increase the generation of Aβ,22 make the dendrites at the top of neurons shrink, and reduce presynaptic vesicles.23
AD is also known as type 3 diabetes, which shows that there is a close relationship between AD and diabetes. Many studies have found that T2DM is an important risk factor for AD. A study by Barbagallo et al found that T2DM increased the risk of ad at least twice.24 Cheng et al studied 1488 diabetic patients in New York and found that T2DM was closely related to the development of AD. Their study also found that the relationship between T2DM and AD may be mediated by pathological changes of cerebral vessels.25 Huang et al found that after adjusting for age, patients with T2DM had a significantly higher risk of developing AD than those without T2DM.26 Moran et al performed a brain MRI scan of 350 T2DM patients and 363 controls. They found that the volume of gray matter, white matter, and hippocampus in T2DM patients was significantly reduced compared with non-diabetic patients. It is further observed that the loss of gray matter in T2DM patients mainly occurs in medial temporal, anterior, cingulate, and medial frontal lobes.27
Other studies have found that T2DM can impair the non-cognitive function of CNS. The study found that 12% of patients with T2DM developed severe depression and 31% had mild or subclinical depression.28 T2DM increased the production of inhibitory neurotransmitters in the brain,29 active HPA axis increased the production of glucocorticoids,30 and promoted the occurrence of depression. Studies have shown that poor glycemic control promotes depression in patients with T2DM.31 For every 1% increase in HbA1c mean, the incidence of depressive symptoms increases by 1.31 times, and the mean HbA1c>7% is significantly associated with the number of T2DM depressive symptoms.17 Kruse et al found that T2DM had an effect on the occurrence of NPS, especially anxiety, which was consistent with our findings. However, they also found that T2DM with HbA1c greater than 7% had no significance, while T2DM with HbA1c less than 7% had significance.32 This is not consistent with the supposed effect of the severity of T2DM on NPS, because HbA1c is only one aspect of T2DM control, and patients who are well controlled may be severely treated with insulin, while patients who are poorly controlled may still be on diet, exercise or medication in the early stages of T2DM.
Some scholars have screened more than 2000 diabetic patients and found that 32.0% of patients exceeded the “mild to severe” anxiety score of HADS, which was significantly higher than the general population sample.33 Trento et al studied the relationship between diabetes and cognitive function, anxiety, depression, and found that depression was associated with female not modified by diabetes duration or switching to insulin therapy. Diabetes duration and lower schooling may affect anxiety and cognitive impairment.34 T2DM can increase the level of serum CRP. The study found that there is a positive correlation between anxiety symptoms and high CRP level in serum, which may be one of the mechanisms of the relationship between T2DM and anxiety symptoms.35,36
Fasting blood glucose directly affects the expression of clock genes (related to the regulation of circadian rhythm),37 and insulin resistance increases with time to increase somatic autonomic symptoms (such as fatigue, sleep disorders, and appetite changes).38 The pineal gland in the brain acts as a “zeitgeber” by secreting melatonin to drive the circadian rhythm. Melatonin and insulin regulate the expression of core clock genes through feedback from various transcription factors.39–41 Recent studies have found that mutations near the core clock gene member CRY2 are associated with elevated fasting blood glucose in humans.42 On the other hand, studies have found that insulin resistance can increase somatic autonomic symptoms (such as fatigue, sleep disorders, and appetite changes) as the disease progresses. Our study supports the view that T2DM promotes nighttime behavioral disturbances in early AD patients.
Typical symptoms of T2DM include eating more and drinking more, highly coordinated interactions between the brain and peripheral metabolic organs are critical for the maintenance of energy and glucose homeostasis.43 The use of diabetes drugs, such as GLP-1 and its analogues, can lead to reduced food intake. A concern about the specificity of the feeding-inhibitory actions of GLP-1 has arisen due to the idea that the decreases in food intake after treatment with GLP-1, or a synthetic analog, are attributable to visceral illness or feelings of nausea. GLP-1 is able to induce a conditioned taste aversion (CTA) under a variety of conditions, but the satiety and CTA effects appear to be nuclei-specific.44
This study has some limitations. First, this study was a cross-sectional study, which concluded that T2DM was associated with onset of mental symptoms in the early stage of AD patients, rather than a causal relationship. Second, in the assessment of NPI-Q, informed persons have certain subjectivity in the assessment and evaluation of AD patients’ conditions,45 which may have an impact on the results. Third, in the early stage of AD, the CDR scores usually fluctuate between 0 and 0.5.46 In conclusion, our study found that T2DM had a significant effect on the occurrence of NPS in the early stage of AD patients, and preventing the occurrence of T2DM might reduce the incidence of NPS, providing a theoretical basis for clinical treatment of AD patients with T2DM.
Ethics and Consent Statement
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Daping Hospital of the Third Military Medical University. The subjects received oral and written information regarding the study and provided informed consent prior to their inclusion in this study.
We would like to thank all the patients and their families who participated in this study. We are deeply indebted to National Natural Science Foundation of China for providing the grants for this study.
All authors contributed to data analysis, drafting or revising the article, gave final approval of the version to be published, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81971033). The study funders had no role in the interpretation of the data.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in this work.
1. Chan KY, Wang W, Wu JJ, et al. Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia in China, 1990-2010: a systematic review and analysis. Lancet. 2013;381(9882):2016–2023. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60221-4
2. Ducat L, Philipson LH, Anderson BJ. The mental health comorbidities of diabetes. JAMA. 2014;312(7):691–692. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.8040
3. Willette AA, Bendlin BB, Starks EJ, et al. Association of insulin resistance with cerebral glucose uptake in late middle-aged adults at risk for Alzheimer disease. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(9):1013–1020. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2015.0613
4. Dubois B, Feldman HH, Jacova C, et al. Research criteria for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: revising the NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(8):734–746. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70178-3
5. Johnson LA, Cushing B, Rohlfing G, et al. The Hachinski ischemic scale and cognition: the influence of ethnicity. Age Ageing. 2014;43(3):364–369. doi:10.1093/ageing/aft189
6. McKeith IG, Boeve BF, Dickson DW, et al. Diagnosis and management of dementia with lewy bodies: fourth consensus report of the DLB consortium. Neurology. 2017;89(1):88–100. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004058
7. Rascovsky K, Hodges JR, Knopman D, et al. Sensitivity of revised diagnostic criteria for the behavioural variant of frontotemporal dementia. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 9):2456–2477. doi:10.1093/brain/awr179
8. Morris JC. The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology. 1993;43(11):2412–2414. doi:10.1212/WNL.43.11.2412-a
9. Zhou H, Deng J, Li J, Wang Y, Zhang M, He H. Study of the relationship between cigarette smoking, alcohol drinking and cognitive impairment among elderly people in China. Age Ageing. 2003;32(2):205–210. doi:10.1093/ageing/32.2.205
10. Kaufer DI, Cummings JL, Ketchel P, et al. Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the Neuropsychiatric Inventory. J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000;12(2):233–239. doi:10.1176/jnp.12.2.233
11. American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes: standards of medical care in diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care. 2019;42(Suppl 1):S13–S28. doi:10.2337/dc19-S002
12. Savva GM, Zaccai J, Matthews FE, Davidson JE, McKeith I, Brayne C. Prevalence, correlates and course of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia in the population. Br J Psychiatry. 2009;194(3):212–219. doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.108.049619
13. Eustace A, Coen R, Walsh C, et al. A longitudinal evaluation of behavioural and psychological symptoms of probable Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;17(10):968–973. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1166
14. Mok WY, Chu LW, Chung CP, Chan NY, Hui SL. The relationship between non-cognitive symptoms and functional impairment in Alzheimer’s disease. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;19(11):1040–1046. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1166
15. Raudino F. Non-cognitive symptoms and related conditions in the Alzheimer’s disease: a literature review. Neurol Sci. 2013;34(8):1275–1282. doi:10.1007/s10072-013-1424-7
16. Li XL, Hu N, Tan MS, Yu JT, Tan L. Behavioral and psychological symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:927804. doi:10.1155/2014/927804
17. Leal SL, Noche JA, Murray EA, Yassa MA. Disruption of amygdala-entorhinal-hippocampal network in late-life depression. Hippocampus. 2017;27(4):464–476. doi:10.1002/hipo.22705
18. Loonen AJ, Ivanova SA. Circuits regulating pleasure and happiness in major depression. Med Hypotheses. 2016;87:14–21. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2015.12.013
19. Ulrich-Lai YM, Herman JP. Neural regulation of endocrine and autonomic stress responses. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(6):397–409. doi:10.1038/nrn2647
20. Ridler C. Alzheimer disease: misfolded diabetes-mellitus peptide seeds amyloid-beta aggregation. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(3):128. doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2017.5
21. Leboucher A, Laurent C, Fernandez-Gomez FJ, et al. Detrimental effects of diet-induced obesity on tau pathology are independent of insulin resistance in tau transgenic mice. Diabetes. 2013;62(5):1681–1688. doi:10.2337/db12-0866
22. Willette AA, Johnson SC, Birdsill AC, et al. Insulin resistance predicts brain amyloid deposition in late middle-aged adults. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11(5):504–510.e501. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2014.03.011
23. Roberts RO, Knopman DS, Przybelski SA, et al. Association of type 2 diabetes with brain atrophy and cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2014;82(13):1132–1141. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000000269
24. Barbagallo M, Dominguez LJ. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and Alzheimer’s disease. World J Diabetes. 2014;5(6):889–893. doi:10.4239/wjd.v5.i6.889
25. Cheng D, Noble J, Tang MX, Schupf N, Mayeux R, Luchsinger JA. Type 2 diabetes and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2011;31(6):424–430. doi:10.1159/000324134
26. Huang CC, Chung CM, Leu HB, et al. Diabetes mellitus and the risk of Alzheimer’s disease: a nationwide population-based study. PLoS One. 2014;9(1):e87095. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0087095
27. Moran C, Beare R, Phan TG, Bruce DG, Callisaya ML, Srikanth V. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and biomarkers of neurodegeneration. Neurology. 2015;85(13):1123–1130. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001982
28. Roy T, Lloyd CE. Epidemiology of depression and diabetes: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2012;142(Suppl):S8–S21. doi:10.1016/S0165-0327(12)70004-6
29. Moulton CD, Pickup JC, Ismail K. The link between depression and diabetes: the search for shared mechanisms. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3(6):461–471. doi:10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00134-5
30. Stetler C, Miller GE. Depression and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activation: a quantitative summary of four decades of research. Psychosom Med. 2011;73(2):114–126. doi:10.1097/PSY.0b013e31820ad12b
31. Gonzalez JS, Peyrot M, McCarl LA, et al. Depression and diabetes treatment nonadherence: a meta-analysis. Diabetes Care. 2008;31(12):2398–2403. doi:10.2337/dc08-1341
32. Kruse J, Schmitz N, Thefeld W. On the association between diabetes and mental disorders in a community sample: results from the German National Health Interview and Examination Survey. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(6):1841–1846. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.6.1841
33. Collins MM, Corcoran P, Perry IJ. Anxiety and depression symptoms in patients with diabetes. Diabet Med. 2009;26(2):153–161. doi:10.1111/dme.2009.26.issue-2
34. Trento M, Trevisan M, Raballo M, et al. Depression, anxiety, cognitive impairment and their association with clinical and demographic variables in people with type 2 diabetes: a 4-year prospective study. J Endocrinol Invest. 2014;37(1):79–85. doi:10.1007/s40618-013-0028-7
35. Copeland WE, Shanahan L, Worthman C, Angold A, Costello EJ. Cumulative depression episodes predict later C-reactive protein levels: a prospective analysis. Biol Psychiatry. 2012;71(1):15–21. doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.09.023
36. Naicker K, Øverland S, Johnson JA, et al. Symptoms of anxiety and depression in type 2 diabetes: associations with clinical diabetes measures and self-management outcomes in the Norwegian HUNT study. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;84(undefined):116–123. doi:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.07.002
37. Stamenkovic JA, Olsson AH, Nagorny CL, et al. Regulation of core clock genes in human islets. Metabolism. 2012;61(7):978–985. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2011.11.013
38. Khambaty T, Stewart JC, Muldoon MF, Kamarck TW. Depressive symptom clusters as predictors of 6-year increases in insulin resistance: data from the pittsburgh healthy heart project. Psychosom Med. 2014;76(5):363–369. doi:10.1097/PSY.0000000000000063
39. Lyssenko V, Nagorny CL, Erdos MR, et al. Common variant in MTNR1B associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes and impaired early insulin secretion. Nat Genet. 2009;41(1):82–88. doi:10.1038/ng.288
40. Peschke E, Peschke D, Hammer T, Csernus V. Influence of melatonin and serotonin on glucose-stimulated insulin release from perifused rat pancreatic islets in vitro. J Pineal Res. 1997;23(3):156–163. doi:10.1111/jpi.1997.23.issue-3
41. Picinato MC, Haber EP, Cipolla‐Neto J, et al. Melatonin inhibits insulin secretion and decreases PKA levels without interfering with glucose metabolism in rat pancreatic islets. J Pineal Res. 2002;33(3):156–160. doi:10.1034/j.1600-079X.2002.02903.x
42. Miller Y, Ma B, CJ T, Nussinov R. Hollow core of Alzheimer’s Abeta42 amyloid observed by cryoEM is relevant at physiological pH. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(32):14128–14133. doi:10.1073/pnas.1004704107
43. Roh E, Song DK, Kim MS. Emerging role of the brain in the homeostatic regulation of energy and glucose metabolism. Exp Mol Med. 2016;48:e216. doi:10.1038/emm.2016.4
44. Thiele TE, Van Dijk G, Campfield LA, et al. Central infusion of GLP-1, but not leptin, produces conditioned taste aversions in rats. Am J Physiol. 1997;272(2 Pt 2):R726–R730. doi:10.1152/ajpregu.1997.272.2.R726
45. Babulal GM, Stout SH, Head D, et al. Neuropsychiatric symptoms and Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers predict driving decline: brief report. J Alzheimers Dis. 2017;58(3):675–680. doi:10.3233/JAD-170067
46. Masters MC, Morris JC, Roe CM. “Noncognitive” symptoms of early Alzheimer disease: a longitudinal analysis. Neurology. 2015;84(6):617–622. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000001238
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF]