Back to Journals » Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management » Volume 16

The Double Burden of the COVID-19 Pandemic and Polypharmacy on Geriatric Population – Public Health Implications

Authors Rahman S, Singh K, Dhingra S, Charan J, Sharma P, Islam S, Jahan D, Iskandar K, Samad N, Haque M

Received 20 July 2020

Accepted for publication 21 September 2020

Published 20 October 2020 Volume 2020:16 Pages 1007—1022

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S272908

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Garry Walsh


Sayeeda Rahman,1 Keerti Singh,2 Sameer Dhingra,3 Jaykaran Charan,4 Paras Sharma,5 Salequl Islam,6 Dilshad Jahan,7 Katia Iskandar,8 Nandeeta Samad,9 Mainul Haque10

1School of Medicine, American University of Integrative Sciences, Bridgetown, Barbados; 2Faculty of Medical Science, The University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Wanstead, Barbados; 3School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The University of the West Indies, St. Augustine Campus, Eric Williams Medical Sciences Complex, Mount Hope, Trinidad & Tobago; 4Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India; 5Department of Pharmacognosy, BVM College of Pharmacy, Gwalior, India; 6Department of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Dhaka 1342, Bangladesh; 7Department of Hematology, Asgar Ali Hospital, Dhaka 1204, Bangladesh; 8School of Pharmacy, Lebanese University, Beirut, Lebanon; 9Department of Public Health, North South University, Bashundhara, Dhaka 1229, Bangladesh; 10The Unit of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health Universiti Pertahanan, Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kuala Lumpur, Kem Perdana Sungai Besi, Malaysia

Correspondence: Mainul Haque
Unit of Pharmacology Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health Universiti Pertahanan, Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kem Perdana Sungai Besi, Kuala Lumpur, 57000, Malaysia
Tel +60109265543
Email runurono@gmail.com

Abstract: COVID-19 pandemic is inducing acute respiratory distress syndrome, multi-organ failure, and eventual death. Respiratory failure is the leading cause of mortality in the elderly population with pre-existing medical conditions. This group is particularly vulnerable to infections due to a declined immune system, comorbidities, geriatric syndrome, and potentially inappropriate polypharmacy. These conditions make the elderly population more susceptible to the harmful effects of medications and the deleterious consequences of infections, including MERS-CoV, SARS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2. Chronic diseases among elderlies, including respiratory diseases, hypertension, diabetes, and coronary heart diseases, present a significant challenge for healthcare professionals. To comply with the clinical guidelines, the practitioner may prescribe a complex medication regimen that adds up to the burden of pre-existing treatment, potentially inducing adverse drug reactions and leading to harmful side-effects. Consequently, the geriatric population is at increased risk of falls, frailty, and dependence that enhances their susceptibility to morbidity and mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 respiratory syndrome, particularly interstitial pneumonia. The major challenge resides in the detection of infection that may present as atypical manifestations in this age group. Healthy aging can be possible with adequate preventive measures and appropriate medication regimen and follow-up. Adherence to the guidelines and recommendations of WHO, CDC, and other national/regional/international agencies can reduce the risks of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Better training programs are needed to enhance the skill of health care professionals and patient’s caregivers. This review explains the public health implications associated with polypharmacy on the geriatric population with pre-existing co-morbidities during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Keywords: elderly, COVID-19, pandemic, viral infection, polypharmacy, co-morbidity, public health

Introduction

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), the world’s population of individuals over 60 years will nearly double from 12% to 22% between the years 2015 and 2050. All countries will struggle to ensure adequate health and social care to meet the needs of this age group.1 Older age is associated with a high incidence of comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, arthritis, chronic heart disease, renal diseases, and Alzheimer’s disease.28 Treating communicable and non-communicable diseases in the elderly requires multiple medication regimens known as polypharmacy.9,10 There is an ambiguity that remains in defining polypharmacy.11,12 Polypharmacy as a word in medical science is quite an old terminology related to the consumption of multiple medicines often without any scientific basis or evidence-based practice. It is over one hundred fifty years before first-ever the term polypharmacy has been described in the medical journal.1316 Nevertheless, the majority of researchers’ most frequently stated definition of polypharmacy based on mathematical calculation, ie, five or more medicine prescribed per day. However, some researchers defined the range as low as two or more to eleven or more medicines per day.12

Polypharmacy and Quality of Life

The prevalence of polypharmacy is increasing,4,6, mainly in patients above sixty-five years.1721 Multinational studies conducted showed that adults with advanced age are taking an average of 2–9 medications/day.22 Aronson of the University of Oxford has reported that polypharmacy often advantageous and itself is not a noticeable problematic clinical issue. However, the tricky issue remains in the event the particular medicine has been prescribed improperly or adequately, ie, careful selection or imprudent selection of drugs. Thereby, equally discretely and in the background of the entire prescribing medicines.2325 Subsequently, polypharmacy may enhance the quality of life of the patient and improve his health status and functionality,26,27, while inappropriate polypharmacy is associated with harmful side effects and the leading cause of frailty and dependence.28,29

Polypharmacy and Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing

However, research in the filed demonstrated showed an alarming increase in the prevalence of inappropriate polypharmacy that ranges from 11.5% to 62.5% in this age group.30 Numerous risk factors (eg, obesity, chronic diseases, tobacco, alcohol use) associated with aging are positively linked with polypharmacy.3135 Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is the leading cause for adverse clinical outcomes and increased healthcare costs,31,32,3438 estimated at a total value of US$ 18 billion, which accounts for 0.3% of the global total health expenditure.39 Inappropriate polypharmacy, particularly among the elderly population, increasers and executes a considerable liability of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Thereby initiate poor health status, incapacity, hospitalization, and even lead to death. The distinct most imperative prognosticator of inappropriate polypharmacy or irrational prescribing and risk of ADRs among the geriatric community is the numerical issue of prescribed medicines.40 Polypharmacy has been identified as a prevalent issue among the elderly population, and an increase in the number of medicines was significantly correlated with worse clinical outcomes and prognosis. The risk of worse clinical results was increased considerably as reported; the odds ratios (OR) were 1.21, 1.16, and 1.19 for ADRs, falls, disability, and mortality.41 Patients of institutional care, typically living at home due to illness or old age, are also at a complex risk of polypharmacy complications with higher cost and hospitalization.26,4248 Polypharmacy often leads to unpleasant to dangerous, life-threatening penalties for patients and the community that includes probable drug interactions, drug-disease interactions, ADRs, non-complaisance, drug-associated complications, adversative clinical consequences such as renal failure and falls leading to fractures, lower quality of life, increase healthcare costs both of individuals and society, as well as an increased risk of mortality.22,26,36,42,49 The complexities of polypharmacy are gravely problematic among geriatric patients as these groups of patients are particularly weak and susceptible.4,5 The dangerous hazards with life-threatening issues of polypharmacy are higher among these patients in comparison to others, due to the presence of one or more additional comorbidities.68

Aging is typically accompanied by physiological changes, including a declined immune system, increased susceptibility to infections, deteriorated kidney function, and geriatric syndrome. These conditions, added to the burden of polypharmacy, may enhance the risk of morbidity and mortality, especially in cases of acute infections. The Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS-CoV), severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS-CoV), SARS-related coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), and coronavirus disease (COVID-19) are members of the same family as coronavirus.50 These viruses may lead to fatal outcomes in humans, including acute respiratory distress syndrome, multiorgan failure, and death, particularly in geriatrics patients with multiple morbidities.4,2236,49,53 Various studies reported that COVID-19 has a similar pathogenic potential to cause respiratory complications, disability, and death as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV.54,55 A recent Chinese study showed that out of 138 hospitalized COVID-19 patients with pneumonia, 26.1% geriatric patients with multiple co-morbidities were transferred to the intensive care unit (ICU) compared with younger adults with fewer co-morbidities.56 This review evaluates the public health implications of the double burden of polypharmacy and COVID-19 pandemic on morbidity and mortality the geriatric population with pre-existing comorbidities.

Materials and Methods

The literature search for this narrative review was performed by searching bibliographic databases (including Google Scholar and PubMed). We principally depend on free downloads as this research did not obtain any financial support. Additionally, the link provided by the Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia [(UPNM) the National Defence University of Malaysia], Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The search terms used were: “Elderly”, “Aging Process”, “Geriatric Community”, “Aged Population”, “Treatment Options”, “Treatment Difficulty”, “COVID-19”, “Pandemic”, “Viral infection”, “Polypharmacy”, “Co-morbidity”, “Public health”, and “Global” followed by snowballing references from high-ranking reputed leading journals around the planet and persuasive highly cited manuscript. Only peer-reviewed articles published in English were included. Articles for which the full text was not available and those not written in English were excluded. The articles retrieved in the first round of search; further references were spotted by a manual search among the cited references. As this is a narrative review, whilst we have included predominantly recent papers, those with historical significance (which are older papers) to the narrative have also been included. There was no attempt to develop a systematic review or meta-analysis.

The Epidemiology of COVID-19 Pandemic in Older Age

The China National Health Commission had already reported that mortality mainly occurred amongst patients of 75 years’ age group.57 The high risk of morbidities in old elders due to the COVID-19 pandemic is also seen in Europe and the UK. The excess mortality data and its comparison between different European countries where the first wave of the global pandemic now seems to be receding.58 Excess mortality is a count of additional deaths due to all causes in comparison to what is expected under normal circumstances. It is evident from that the percentage of deaths due to the COVID-19 concerning excess death has varied between different European countries. The highest rate of excess deaths was reported in Belgium (110%). The excess more than 100% may suggest that the most excess deaths were due to the COVID-19, and the deaths due to other reasons may have declined. The P-score, which is the ratio or percentage of excess deaths concerning normal average deaths, is very high for many European countries like the UK and Spain. The P-scores reflect the impact of the pandemic over an eleven (11) weeks’ time frames with Spain and England’s values being almost the same.58 The cumulative P-scores for “all ages” data show that England and Spain reported a practically similar rate of excesses deaths. Belgium and Italy followed Spain in Europe, whereas in the UK, Scotland and Wales followed England. It is interesting to observe that although variant P-scores followed the cumulative p-score in all the groups but remained little below the cumulative p-score. This is because the variant P-scores provide an assumption for historical data variance that defines the threshold for an average number of deaths. It represents the maximum number of deaths associated with that threshold and calculates a percentage. So, the variance P-score is always slightly below the simple P-score. P-score data for all age groups across the weeks of the COVID-19 pandemic.58 It is evident from the above figure that the consequences of the peak level occurrence of the pandemic are more severe in Spain in comparison to the rest of the countries in Europe and the UK. However, it is lasted longer in England (which caused the high numbers of deaths) in comparison to all the other countries followed by Belgium and Italy. The age-wise P-scores ratio for the groups of working-age adults (15–64 years) and the group of adults who are more than 85 years.58 There is a clear trend of more “excess deaths” in old age as compared to a younger generation. The cumulative p-scores for the working adults, those are between 15–64 years was negative in France. This might be due to preventive measures such as social distancing, lockdown, and many more measures locally implemented which might have reduced the number of deaths from other causes such as road accidents for the working population. England and Wales reported the highest mortalities in this age group. The p-score was high for the 85+ age group in all the six countries, and Spain reported the highest cumulative P-score over the pandemic weeks in this category. The geriatric population is severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic in comparison to working-age adults. This might be due to the presence of other comorbidities, weak immunity, and concurrent administration of several drugs. The comparison of the p-scores over the weeks for different age groups, ie, 15–65 years and 85+ years adults. The old-age adults who belong to the 85+ age group affected severely throughout Europe and the UK throughout the peak of the pandemic.44 The similar trend is seen in the USA, where 48.7% to total confirmed deaths due to COVID-19 are reported in old adults (75+ years and over).59

Polypharmacy and the Risk of Infections in the Elderly Population

The number of people aged 65 or older is estimated to increase twofold from 524 million in 2010 to nearly 1.5 billion in 2050.60 Current statistics show that people 80 years of age and above accounts for approximately people in the 80-years age group, comprise approximately 10% of the world’s population.61,62 The aging process is accompanied by physiologic changes that vary among individuals and become more critical with advanced age. Older age may be accompanied by multiple comorbidities, including geriatric syndrome, frailty, and dependence. These conditions are associated with the high economic and clinical burden in a world struggling for cost containments due to increasingly scarce resources.11,63 Co-morbidities in the aging population can pose unusual challenges Ranging from complex medication regimen, inappropriate polypharmacy, non-compliance, ADRs, drug-drug, and drug-food or herbal remedies interactions. This can potentially contribute to further prescribing cascade and prescribing vortex and to significant complications in the elderly leading to frailty and a weakened immune system.64,65 The physiologic changes typically occurring with age can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of medications and alters the bioavailability of the medications and, ultimately, the effectiveness of the treatment. As a result, the geriatric population may be at higher risk of hospitalization, a major contributory factor to low immunity, pneumonia, sarcopenia, depression, fall, and malnutrition. In other terms to geriatric syndrome and potentially irreversible dependence. Other risk factors include age predilection (ie, male gender), living in nursing homes, social factors, and family factors.66,67 This may constitute a tremendous challenge and puts extra pressure on prescribers that struggle to optimize medication use in geriatrics and avoid dependence. The literature review that the elderly susceptibility to communicable diseases, mainly to viral illnesses, is well documented. Patients are usually immunocompromised and, after that, suffer a lot even from the common cold (rhinovirus) in comparison to younger patients.68 A study revealed that respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is a significant health issue among elderly and high-risk (chronic heart or lung disease) adults.69 Furthermore, RSV infection is correlated with hospitalizations for pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and asthma accounting for 10.6%, 11.4%, 5.4%, and 7.2% of hospitalizations, respectively.69 RSV and influenza virus remain as top respiratory viruses responsible for the highest morbidity and mortality,70 with influenza being an engrained reason for periodic hospital admissions among the elderly population worldwide,7173 and in the USA.55 Although influenza has been principally classified as one of the predominant clinical complications of elderly patients with co-morbidities, it is often under-assessed and, its diagnosis could be challenging.74,75 In addition to this, the patient’s predominant cause of morbidity obscures the identification of essential symptoms and signs of influenza; furthermore, medical professionals tend to focus more on patients’ known pathology.74,7679 Outcomes in these patients aging 65 years or over, are usually fatal, some even do not develop pneumonia, and 89% die either because of pneumonia and influenza; pneumonia was equally responsible for high death reports during the Spanish flu of 1918.80,81 Morbidity increases considerably among survivors, and up to 10–12% of these aged patient groups need a higher level of support for day to day work after discharge from hospital for acute respiratory diseases.55 In the USA, the average rates of influenza and RSV hospitalizations were 63.5 and 55.3 per 100,000 person-years, respectively, with the highest hospitalization rates among patients aged ≥65.82 Another research involving sixteen countries of the American continent revealed that the mean pooled rate of influenza-related respiratory issues that needed hospital care was 90/100,000 population among children aged below five years, 21/100,000 population among persons aged 5–64 years, and 141/100,000 population among persons aged 65 years or above. This study appraised the mean per yearly influenza-related respiratory pathologies that needed admissions in hospitals among the Americas to be 772,000.83

Aging, Polypharmacy and COVID-19 Pandemic

On December 12, 2019, the first COVID case with apparent pneumonia was identified in Wuhan, China, and on December 31, 27 cases of severe viral pneumonia were confirmed. Medical history revealed the possibility of a viral outbreak of Novel SARS-COV-2 from wild bats and Gp 2-B-CoVs comprising of severe acute respiratory syndrome-related (SARS-COV).84 According to recent reports, the elderly population with a higher prevalence of frailty and co-morbidities is at utmost risk from COVID-19,85 due to a decrease in intrinsic capacity and resilience, which undermines their resistance to any disease/infection.86 Eight out of 10 deaths among confirmed COVID cases in the USA are reported in elderly persons above 65 years.85 Pneumonia is the most severe complication of the influenza virus or COVID-19; any infectious disease like COVID-19, especially in the elderly patient with multiple co-morbidities and polypharmacy, has the potential to turn into pneumonia.87,88 Therefore, it may be possible that in the elderly population, polypharmacy acts as a risk factor for the death procession of COVID-19. It has been observed that COVID-19 and influenza viruses have comparable symptoms and signs of respiratory disease, which often remain asymptomatic or mild to severe illness and death. Equally, both viruses are communicated by contact, droplets, and fomites. Accordingly, the identical non-pharmaceutical public health interventions, for instance, hand hygiene and good respiratory custom, stay at home, restrict visitors are precautionary measures every individual should practice averting infection.85,89 Not enough time has passed to explore the detailed epidemiology of COVID-19; so far, it is known to be non-comprehensive. Phylogenetic analysis revealed SARS-CoV-2 to have significant sequence similarity to the SARS-like bat virus. Bats could be the possible primary reservoir, intermediate host, and further transfer is unknown, though human to human transmission is confirmed.90 WHO reports,91 95% of COVID-19 deaths occurred in older adults > 60years, more than 50% of all deaths were in people >80years; 8 of 10 deaths had at least one underlying co-morbidity, in particular cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, and a range of other chronic conditions.92,93 Lab confirmed COVID-19 cases presenting with any co-morbidity resulted in poorer clinical outcomes than those without; an increasing number of co-morbidities correlate with poorer clinical outcomes.94 COVID-19 is highly infectious and can result in fatal co-morbidities, particularly acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS),95 involving bilateral pneumonia (75% cases) complicated by ARDS (17%),86,9698 a clear indication of ICU admission and mortality in elderly. Currently, the installation of the mechanical ventilator and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) systems are lifesaving measures for COVID-19 patients with severe pneumonia or ARDS.99101 A recent study102 from New York (USA) of COVID −19 cases reported of the mortality rate of 97.2% in ICU patients >65 years of age who received mechanical ventilation compared to a rate of only 26.6% for the same age patients who did not receive mechanical ventilation. Weaning from mechanical ventilation posed a risk of myopathy of critical illness and prolonged ICU stay due to acute lung injury, especially in patients above 70 years of age, which is a subsequent challenge.103 On some occasions, COVID-19 patients developed sepsis, shock, septic shock, and multiple organ failure.104106 Unfortunately, the typical pathological progression in COVID-19 is still not a well-determined fact.107 Furthermore, among deceased cases, low lymphocyte counts, high C-reactive protein, or D-dimer levels were found, which are linked to poor prognosis.86 Still, it offers no conclusive evidence about the definite cause of death.96,108,109 Latest reports highlight differences between the ARDS related to COVID-19 and ARDS that are caused by other factors as defined by Berlin criteria,110 which are suggestive of difference in treatment. COVID-19 clinical symptoms were not consistent with the laboratory and imaging findings. Nevertheless, these patients may deteriorate rapidly and need close monitoring, which is noteworthy and critical for the elderly.95

COVID-19 Pandemic: Comorbidities and Atypical Presentation in Elderly Population

In addition to respiratory diseases, hypertension, diabetes, and coronary heart diseases have rapidly emerged as a significant co-morbidity for COVID-19 infection.1 Patients suffering from these chronic diseases were also vulnerable, with an increased risk of being infected by the coronavirus and experience severe forms of COVID-19 related complications.1,36,111115 Treatment of these chronic disease conditions in COVID-19 patients need careful consideration as these patients have already been treated with multiple drugs. Polypharmacy may aggravate the clinical condition of COVID-19 patients. Hypertensive patients with other associated cardiovascular morbidities are often treated with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs). The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors may cause severe COVID-19 infection by binding to ACE2 in the lung to enter cells and replicate.116,117 A study demonstrated that ACE2 expression increased further in diabetes due to treatment with ACE inhibitors and ARBs.23 This increased expression facilitates infection in COVID-19 patients, which hypothesized that ACEI and ARB treatment might enhance the access of SARS-CoV-2 into cells, increase the risk of infection or increase the severity of COVID-19.1,111,112 Although another study stated that these agents are neither found to have harmful nor beneficial effects over COVID-19; therefore, it was advised to continue treatment.32 De Abajo et al also demonstrated that the use of RAAS inhibitors neither increased the risk of COVID-19 nor required admission to hospital compared with other antihypertensive drugs.118 However, patients receiving these medications require additional monitoring.119

Patients with diabetes have an increased risk of contracting influenza and pneumonia.120,121 High death rates among diabetic patients were noted with H1N1 influenza and MERS-CoV viruses.122,123 It is now well established that diabetes is one of the significant comorbidities associated with COVID-19.113115,124 The prevalence of diabetes in patients with COVID-19 was reported 520%, 17%, 28.3% in China, Italy, and the USA.99101 A recent French study found that 10.6% of COVID-19 patients with diabetes died within the first seven days of hospitalization, and 20.1% required tracheal intubation for mechanical ventilation.124 In older adults, patients diagnosed with COVID-19 infections may not present with typical clinical symptoms such as cough, dyspnea, and fever. Studies have shown that only 20–30% of infected elderly may have a fever.125 Atypical manifestations of COVID-19 infection include generalized weakness, delirium, malaise, dizziness, functional decline, fall, headache, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain, anorexia, increased sputum production, rhinorrhea, chest pain, hemoptysis, nasal congestion, anosmia.125127 These atypical symptoms and signs are quite similar among elderly individuals with co-morbidities and inappropriate polypharmacy. Thereby, increases the possibility of admitted to a general medicine or geriatric care ward.128 Subsequently, several geriatric groups including WHO raise their voice regarding the need for watchfulness and cognizance to avert delayed diagnosis of COVid-19 among senior members of the community and minimizing both morbidity and mortality.127,129,130

Strategies to Reduce and Prevent Polypharmacy in Older Patients

Inappropriate polypharmacy is a significant public health concern in the care of the geriatric population. It is reported that approximately 11% of unplanned hospital admissions attribute to harm from medicines, and over 70% of these were due to elderly patients on polypharmacy.109 The world can save around 0.3% of the global health budget by appropriate management of polypharmacy with timely and effective interventions.131 Several assessment instruments have been developed to minimize inappropriate polypharmacy and ADRs.132 Additionally, Medication review, patient and family interview, searching for signs of frailty, patient fall, malnutrition, and geriatric syndrome may serve as baseline information to optimize medication use in the geriatric population.132 Dwyer et al reported that proper surveillance of those patients consuming multiple medications and its forfeits improves the quality of life in the elderly population.133 It is also essential to identify frail older individuals with polypharmacy; a study reported a significant correlation between the Frailty Index (FI) score and both PIP and ADRs in hospitalized elderly patients.134 Medical interventions are intended to benefit patients. However, medication also possesses the risk of ADRs leading to death, resulting in increased public health burden worldwide. Patient safety culture should be promoted to prevent healthcare-associated harms.135 The WHO Universal Health Coverage (UHC) plan and the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) have included patient safety as a significant component of health care delivery.136 “Medication without Harm 2017”, to reduce 50% of avoidable ADRs in the next five years, was launched as WHO is the third Global Patient Safety Challenge.137 Polypharmacy was included among three priority areas, the other two being medication safety in high-risk situations and transitions of care.136,137 It is equally critical to reducing medication harms; this could be achieved by considering appropriate pharmacy and reducing polypharmacy. Prescribing error rate increases with the number of drugs prescribed,138,139, and the incidence of patient-reported errors increase with the number of medicines consumed.140 Inappropriate medications can be avoided in older adults utilizing Beers criteria.132 Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) such as medication errors including suspected errors should be reported to ensure patient safety and promote prudent prescribing.141 Medication reconciliation is necessary at transitions of care to decrease medication discrepancies, potential adverse effects, and ADEs in especially the high-risk group of patients receiving polypharmacy.136 It is reported that nursing homes are at higher risk from polypharmacy (often reported topmost) among elderly individuals and ADRs complications due to inappropriate prescribing.36,142 Moreover, consumption of non-prescribed medications and traditional and complementary medicines contribute to the polypharmacy burden causing Drug-Drug Interactions (DDIs).142

Medication reviews are popularly used to tackle inappropriate polypharmacy by providing a structured evaluation to prevent harm, treatments, and medicine use that can be optimized to improve outcomes for each patient.136 Ideally, medication reviews should be performed in collaboration with the patient or their caregiver. There are reports suggesting medication reviews can reduce the number of preventable ADEs and averts the number of emergency department contacts; however, there was no improvement in mortality rates.136 The NO TEARS tool can be used by physicians to make the medication review exercise simpler.132 A recent article highlights the importance of medication optimization and deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in elderly individuals; by decreasing the use of PIMs and thereby reducing polypharmacy, this population can be better prepared for inclusion in trials, corroborated by pharmacologic treatment or prevention of COIVD-19.144 A drug-by-drug elimination trial, using risks versus benefit criteria, should be used for discontinuing any drugs used for the treatment of chronic ailments. Finally, a Good Palliative-Geriatric Practice algorithm can be used to guide cessation of any inappropriate medications in older adults.130

ADEs in the elderly need to access the emergency department (ED) urgently; therefore, the emergency physicians must be skilled in detecting any ADRs, DDIs including interactions between prescribed and self-medicated medicines.145 Currently, a significant trend of management by computerized discharge instructions and prescriptions is followed in ED.145 McDonald et al,146 recommended that patients having multidisciplinary co-morbidities need multidimensional assessment (MDA) and interdisciplinary strategy in the management of the geriatric population. Clinicians should regularly educate regarding medical errors, prescribed medication, traditional medicines, and polypharmacy to their elderly patients and their caregivers.85,145 A multidisciplinary collaboration amongst health care providers is an essential need.104

As older people are most vulnerable and at highest risk for fatality with COVID-19, screening and triage are crucial for early recognition when suspecting COVID-19 infection, especially in elderly patients with co-morbidities who are at risk of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI);147 polypharmacy can also be detected at this point. WHO recommended that early detection of inappropriate medication prescriptions in elderly patients being treated for COVID-19 to prevent any ADEs and DDIs. All health professionals must be cautious of the correct choice and dosage of the medicine with its’ potential ADRs. At the same time, safer alternative drug therapies should be considered.145 Recently, Smith et al,148 reported the challenge of reliable clinical advice to guide COVID-19 therapy in individuals with one or more co-medications. In many cases, critically ill COVID-19 patients are receiving either single or a combination of drugs which may cause cardiovascular side effects such as torsades de pointes (TdP), prolonged QT interval, or may have other risk factors (eg, hypokalemia, female gender, age >70 years). Although there are websites (eg, www.covid19-druginteractions.org, CredibleMeds) that classify drugs having a known risk, possible risk, and a conditional risk, still appropriate clinical advice must be given about the safe use of one or more co-medications in elderly patients.67

Elderly persons with probable or suspected COVID-19 infection should be provided person-centered assessment through multidisciplinary collaboration and involvement of caregivers and family members throughout the management.146 CDC recommends the development of patient care plans for the elderly patients, which can be completed in consultation with the treating physician; this can be updated yearly.85 Further extra precautions are needed for older adults during COVID-19 at seniors living facilities; long term care facilities ought to limit guests, frequently check care staff and residents for fevers and symptoms of COVID-19, and eventually limit activities at intervals the power to stay residents safe. Unfortunately, DDIs can occur even after discontinuing the drugs due to a very long half-life.149 At the time of discharge, pharmacists mediate with the medical team/primary care provider to prevent polypharmacy, to strictly avoid excessive dispensing and irrational medication, and prevent any likelihood of ADRs.150 Moreover, a copy of discharge instructions is also provided for a follow-up visit. Extra care is needed as polypharmacy is almost a reality among elderly patients; primary care physicians must have a better understanding of aging physiology and pharmacology and provide person-centered assessment because they are the primary prescribers in the community.104 Newly diagnosed patients should be followed by scheduled visits within a limited period of starting a new medication. Primary care physicians can utilize a non-pharmaceutical approach that includes changes in lifestyle based on scientific evidence in selected cases. It was reported that elderly patients with higher literacy were more informed about their medicament and health condition and were more likely to be involved in self-monitoring and accepting medical interventions to avoid polypharmacy; thus, resulting in fewer medications.65,151 The critical point to remember is that medicines often cause ADRs beside their therapeutic benefits and effects on the improvement of quality of life; they increase both morbidity and mortality in the elderly.141

Deprescribing as One Strategy to Reduce Inappropriate Polypharmacy

The term deprescribing (or de‐prescribing) at first described in the English health-related scientific manuscript 2003 in an Australian Hospital Pharmacy journal in an article titled, ‘Deprescribing: achieving better health outcomes for older people through reducing medications.152 Deprescribing is defined as the systematic process of identifying and discontinuing drugs in instances in which existing or potential harms outweigh existing or potential benefits within the context of an individual patient’s care goals, the current level of functioning, life expectancy, values, and preferences.40 Other researchers defined as “deprescribing is the process of withdrawal of an inappropriate medication, supervised by a health care professional to manage polypharmacy and improve outcomes”.153 Multiple studies evidenced that of the ADRs related to polypharmacy among the elderly community, concomitantly ropes the necessity for deprescribing especially in ageing population.26,154158

Several instruments were developed to support the deprescribing process.134,159 The Beers criteria,160 STOPP tool,161 Improved Prescribing in the Elderly Tool,162 McLeod criteria,163 Medication Inappropriateness Index,164 Fit for the Aged Criteria,165 and the PRISCUS166 has been registered as the screening instruments to recognize drugs those were imprudently prescribed and causative factor for ADRs. However, the Beers criteria and STOPP tool are extensively utilized because of more suitability and reliability in categorizing possible inappropriate polypharmacy among the elderly community.167 The Drug Burden Index,168, and the Anticholinergic Risk Scale,169 both were evolved to measure risk scales comprehensively regarding the anticholinergic and sedative problem of all the medications. Both instruments were strongly correlated with anticholinergic effects in declining physical and cognitive function.170,171 Although, these two scales were not widely used in clinical practice because of their complex nature.172 Additionally, risk Scores173,175 or clinical probability assessment176,179 assessed the hazard of ADEs in specific patients depending on multivariate statistics which include sociodemographic parameters, number of prescribed and consumed medicine, renal physiological status, and other comorbidities. Furthermore, deprescribing guiding principles are principally focused on how safely to stop a particular medicine (or classes) which have been recognizing inappropriate/imprudent selection for particular clinical need. These guidelines are flourishing,143,180183 nevertheless, the quality of these guidelines on clinical decision-making and outcome is not appraised as a whole.172

Appropriate Polypharmacy’ and Medicine Safety During COVID-19 Pandemic

Polypharmacy is one of the most significant prescribing challenges within all health care settings worldwide.13,184,185 According to WHO: Health care interventions are intended to benefit patients, but they can also cause harm. Every year, a significant number of patients are harmed or die because of unsafe health care, resulting in a high public health burden worldwide. Most of this harm is preventable.186 Medication safety in polypharmacy needs to be ensured at all levels of healthcare settings. Though polypharmacy intensifies the risk of adverse health events, WHO reported that there are cases where polypharmacy is required and has noticeable advantages.149 Polypharmacy has beneficial effects in specific clinical conditions, eg, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and patients with multiple-morbidity.187 Polypharmacy is also identified as a risk factor for under-prescribing, which may compromise patients’ safety and well-being.187 Healthcare professionals often prescribe many drugs to match the complex needs of their older patients with multi-modalities as per disease-specific clinical practice guidelines.188 It is sometimes problematic to assess the correct selection of medicine, its’ beneficial effect, and ADRs in the clinical need.12,189

The treatment of COVID‐19 patients with co-morbidities may result in problematic polypharmacy and an increased risk of DDIs.67 The use of safe medication in older adults during the current COVID-19 pandemic is highly essential to prevent avoidable drug-related adverse events and facilitate quick recovery of COVID-19 elderly patients, especially during unplanned and emergency hospital admission.190 However, it has been recommended to use the evidence-based practice to reduce inappropriate polypharmacy and promote “appropriate polypharmacy”.2,12,13,26,27 To promote appropriate polypharmacy, multiple sustainable programs have been implemented worldwide, particularly in high-income countries.191,192 Evidence-based guidelines should be developed on appropriate pharmacies, and more research is needed on patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Better training programs need to be developed and implemented for healthcare professionals to manage complex multimorbidity and polypharmacy in elderly patients. Though there are no specific recommendations for older adults, COVID‐19 should be clinically managed by following the WHO and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines.193,194

Conclusion

The prevalence of polypharmacy is abruptly increasing in the elderly. Frail and comorbid elderly populations are at the utmost risk due to a decrease in intrinsic capacity and resilience, which undermines their resistance to any disease/infection. Majority of COVID-19 patients with pneumonia who require ICU treatment were geriatric patients with multiple co-morbidities. Currently, the detail of the epidemiology of COVID-19 is still emerging, and the typical pathological progression is not well-determined. COVID-19 has similar pathogenic potential to cause respiratory complications, disability, and death as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. Pneumonia is the most severe complication of the Influenza virus or COVID-19, and any infection in the elderly patient can turn into fatal pneumonia. Respiratory failure due to ARDs is the leading cause of death in the elderly. Polypharmacy may be required in some cases, and “appropriate polypharmacy” is the key to success. The treatment of COVID‐19 patients with co-morbidities may result in problematic polypharmacy. The consequence of polypharmacy among the aged population is often correlated with poor compliance, DDIs, medication errors, and ADRs, which includes falls, skeletal bone fractures, confusion, and delirium. A multidisciplinary approach with pharmacists mediating with the medical team/primary care provider to prevent polypharmacy should be followed; excessive dispensing and irrational medication should be strictly avoided in order to prevent any likelihood of ADRs and reduce health care costs; computerized discharge instructions and prescriptions are essential for follow up. Better Training programs are needed for health care professionals and patient’s caregivers. Clinical management should follow the WHO, CDC, and other national/regional/international guidelines and recommendations. Overall, the global pandemic gives us a lesson to overhaul total healthcare based on primary health care all over our planet.195198,200,207

Recommendations

During the COVID-19 crisis, non-pharmaceutical interventions, eg, maintain good personal hygiene and good respiratory practice, maintain regular physical activity, and consume natural immunity boosters, especially of food origins, should be practiced; safer alternative therapies should be explored, when available. Clinicians must avoid over-prescription of needless drugs, use simplified regimens with the lowest possible effective dose to prevent ADRs and cost constraints in elderly patients. Excellent communication amongst health care personals with computerized discharge instructions and medications with reporting of any adverse drug event is needed. The telemedicine system with the service of respective health care workers known adverse consequences of polypharmacy is suggested. All stakeholders play pivotal roles in the management of polypharmacy, including multifaceted decision-making, amalgamated knowledge of physicians, nurses, pharmacists, and other health care workers, along with structured involvement, engagement, and empowerment of the patient. The use of easily accessible, updated databases, and software is imperative. Patient and family education regarding medication usage is recommended. WHO suggests that countries and stakeholders focus on three priority areas for effective management: medication safety in high-risk situations, medication safety in polypharmacy, and medication safety in transitions of care. Above all, the guidelines and recommendations prescribed by WHO, CDC, and other national/regional/international should be strictly followed for treatment and prevention of COVID-19 infection. Guidelines established by WHO, CDC, and other leading health-related institutions should be followed and maintained properly to combat the pandemic.

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to Professor (Dr.) M. S. Razzaque, MBBS, Ph.D. of Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pennsylvania, USA, and Dr. Md Anwarul Azim Majumder, MBBS, Ph.D. of Director of Medical Education in the Faculty of Medical Sciences, Cave Hill Campus, The University of the West Indies, Barbados for their valuable suggestions to develop the paper. Authors express heartfelt gratitude to Mr. Scott Bryant, Freelance Editor Ontario, Canada, who was kind enough to read and edit the manuscript. He has taken special care regarding the English language.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis, and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they do not have any financial involvement or affiliations with any organization, association, or entity which has a direct or indirect relationship with the subject matter or materials presented in this article. This also includes honoraria, expert testimony, employment, ownership of stocks or options, patents or grants received or pending, or royalties.

References

1. O’Mara G. Could ACE inhibitors and particularly ARBs increase susceptibility to COVID-19 infection? BMJ. 2020;368:m406.

2. Nobili A, Garattini S, Mannucci PM. Multiple diseases and polypharmacy in the elderly: challenges for the internist of the third millennium. J Comorb. 2011;1:28–44. doi:10.15256/joc.2011.1.4

3. Prithviraj GK, Koroukian S, Margevicius S, Berger NA, Bagai R, Owusu C. Patient characteristics associated with polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing of medications among older adults with cancer. J Geriatr Oncol. 2012;3(3):228–237. doi:10.1016/j.jgo.2012.02.005

4. Zelko E, Klemenc-Ketis Z, Tusek-Bunc K. Medication adherence in elderly with polypharmacy living at home: a systematic review of existing studies. Mater Sociomed. 2016;28(2):129–132. doi:doi.10.5455/msm.2016.28.129-132.

5. Herr M, Sirven N, Grondin H, Pichetti S, Sermet C. Frailty, polypharmacy, and potentially inappropriate medications in old people: findings in a representative sample of the French population. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2017;73(9):1165–1172. doi:10.1007/s00228-017-2276-5.

6. Stocks SJ, Kontopantelis E, Akbarov A, Rodgers S, Avery AJ, Ashcroft DM. Examining variations in prescribing safety in UK general practice: cross-sectional study using the clinical practice research datalink. BMJ. 2015;351:h5501. doi:10.1136/bmj.h5501

7. Hanlon P, Nicholl BI, Jani BD, et al. Examining patterns of multimorbidity, polypharmacy, and risk of adverse drug reactions in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional UK Biobank study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e018404. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018404

8. Dookeeram D, Bidaisee S, Paul JF, et al. Polypharmacy and potential drug-drug interactions in emergency department patients in the Caribbean. Int J Clin Pharm. 2017;39(5):1119‐27. doi:10.1007/s11096-017-0520-9

9. Kantor ED, Rehm CD, Haas JS, Chan AT, Giovannucci EL. Trends in prescription drug use among adults in the United States from 19992012. JAMA. 2015;314(17):1818–1831. doi:10.1001/jama.2015.13766

10. Hovstadius B, Hovstadius K, Astrand B, Petersson G. Increasing polypharmacy - an individual-based study of the Swedish population 20052008. BMC Clin Pharmacol. 2010;10:16. doi:10.1186/1472-6904-10-16

11. Bushardt RL, Massey EB, Simpson TW, Ariail JC, Simpson KN. Polypharmacy: misleading, but manageable. Clin Interv Aging. 2008;3(2):383–389. doi:10.2147/cia.s2468

12. Masnoon N, Shakib S, Kalisch-Ellett L, Caughey GE. What is polypharmacy? A systematic review of definitions. BMC Geriatr. 2017;17(1):230. doi:10.1186/s12877-017-0621-2

13. Duerden M, Avery T, Payne R Polypharmacy and medicines optimization: making it safe and sound. London: the King’s Fund; 2013. Available from http://www.volgmed.ru/uploads/files/2014-12/35099-prilozhenie_1-3_k_informacionnomu_pismu_2.pdf. [Accessed September 10, 2020.]

14. Friend DG. Polypharmacy; multiple-ingredient and shotgun prescriptions. N Engl J Med. 1959;260(20):1015–1018. doi:10.1056/NEJM195905142602005

15. De Las Cuevas C, Sanz EJ. Polypharmacy in psychiatric practice in the Canary Islands. BMC Psychiatry. 2004;4:18. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-4-18

16. Riker GI, Setter SM. Polypharmacy in older adults at home: what it is and what to do about it–implications for home healthcare and hospice. Home Healthc Nurse. 2012;30(8):474–487. doi:10.1097/NHH.0b013e31826502dd

17. Guthrie B, Makubate B, Hernandez-Santiago V, Dreischulte T. The rising tide of polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions: population database analysis 19952010. BMC Med. 2015;13:74. doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0322-7

18. Walckiers D, Van der Heyden J, Tafforeau J. Factors associated with excessive polypharmacy in older people. Arch Public Health. 2015;73:50. doi:10.1186/s13690-015-0095-7

19. Moriarty F, Hardy C, Bennett K, Smith SM, Fahey T. Trends and interaction of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in primary care over 15 years in Ireland: a repeated cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(9):e008656. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008656

20. Ong SM, Lim YMF, Sivasampu S, Khoo EM. Variation of polypharmacy in older primary care attenders occurs at the prescriber level. BMC Geriatr. 2018;18(1):59. doi:10.1186/s12877-018-0750-2

21. Beuscart JB, Petit S, Gautier S, et al. Polypharmacy in older patients: identifying the need for support by a community pharmacist. BMC Geriatr. 2019;19(1):277. doi:10.1186/s12877-019-1276-y

22. Hajjar ER, Cafiero AC, Hanlon JT. Polypharmacy in elderly patients. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2007;5(4):345–351. doi:10.1016/j.amjopharm.2007.12.002

23. Aronson JK. Polypharmacy, appropriate, and inappropriate. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(528):484–485.

24. Aronson JK. In defense of polypharmacy. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57:119–120. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02067.x

25. Aronson JK. Rational prescribing, appropriate prescribing. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57:229–230. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02090.x

26. Dagli RJ, Sharma A. Polypharmacy: a global risk factor for elderly people. J Int Oral Health. 2014;6(6):i–ii.

27. Molokhia M, Majeed A. Current and future perspectives on the management of polypharmacy. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):70. doi:10.1186/s12875-017-0642-0

28. Gutiérrez-Valencia M, Izquierdo M, Cesari M, Casas-Herrero Á, Inzitari M, Martínez-Velilla N. The relationship between frailty and polypharmacy in older people: A systematic review. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;84(7):1432–1444. doi:10.1111/bcp.13590

29. Porter B, Arthur A, Savva GM. How do potentially inappropriate medications and polypharmacy affect mortality in frail and non-frail cognitively impaired older adults? A cohort study. BMJ Open. 2019;9(5):e026171. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026171

30. Kwan D, Farrell B. Polypharmacy: optimizing medication use in elderly patients. Can Geriatr J. 2014;4(1):21–27.

31. Pappa E, Kontodimopoulos N, Papadopoulos AA, Tountas Y, Niakas D. Prescribed-drug utilization and polypharmacy in a general population in Greece: association with sociodemographic, health needs, health-services utilization, and lifestyle factors. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;67(2):185–192. doi:10.1007/s00228-010-0940-0

32. Charlesworth CJ, Smit E, Lee DS, Alramadhan F, Odden MC. Polypharmacy Among Adults Aged 65 Years and Older in the United States: 19882010. J Gerontol, a Biol Sci Med Sci. 2015;70(8):989–995. doi:10.1093/gerona/glv013

33. Wong H, Heuberger R, Logomarsino J, Hewlings S. Associations between alcohol use, polypharmacy, and falls in older adults. Nurs Older People. 2016;28(1):30–36.

34. Hovstadius B, Petersson G. Factors leading to excessive polypharmacy. Clin Geriatr Med. 2012;28(2):159–172. doi:10.1016/j.cger.2012.01.001

35. Carmona-Torres JM, Cobo-Cuenca AI, Recio-Andrade B, Laredo-Aguilera JA, Martins MM, Rodríguez-Borrego MA. Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy in the older people: 20062014. J Clin Nurs. 2018;27(1516):2942–2952. doi:10.1111/jocn.14371

36. Maher RL, Hanlon J, Hajjar ER. Clinical consequences of polypharmacy in elderly. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2014;13(1):57–65. doi:10.1517/14740338.2013.827660

37. Cahir C, Fahey T, Teeling M, Teljeur C, Feely J, Bennett K. Potentially inappropriate prescribing and cost outcomes for older people: a national population study. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69(5):543–552. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03628.x

38. Bradley MC, Fahey T, Cahir C, et al. Potentially inappropriate prescribing and cost outcomes for older people: a cross-sectional study using the Northern Ireland Enhanced Prescribing Database. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;68(10):1425–1433. doi:10.1007/s00228-012-1249-y

39. Aitken M, Gorokhovich L. Advancing the Responsible Use of Medicines: Applying Levers for Change. Parsippany (NJ): IMS Institute for Healthcare Informatics; 2012.

40. Scott IA, Hilmer SN, Reeve E, et al. Reducing inappropriate polypharmacy: the process of deprescribing. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(5):827–834. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.0324

41. Wang R, Chen L, Fan L, et al. Incidence and effects of polypharmacy on clinical outcome among patients aged 80+: a five-year follow-up study. PLoS One. 2015;10(11):e0142123. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142123

42. Tiihonen J, Suokas JT, Suvisaari JM, Haukka J, Korhonen P. Polypharmacy with antipsychotics, antidepressants, or benzodiazepines and mortality in schizophrenia. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(5):476‐83. doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.1532

43. Tjia J, Velten SJ, Parsons C, Valluri S, Briesacher BA. Studies to reduce unnecessary medication use in frail older adults: a systematic review. Drugs Aging. 2013;30(5):285‐307. doi:10.1007/s40266-013-0064-1

44. Sönnichsen A, Trampisch US, Rieckert A, et al. Polypharmacy in chronic diseases-reduction of inappropriate medication and adverse drug events in older populations by electronic decision support (PRIMA-eDS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2016;17:57. doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1177-8

45. Uchida M, Suzuki S, Sugawara H, et al. A nationwide survey of hospital pharmacist interventions to improve polypharmacy for patients with cancer in palliative care in Japan. J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2019;5:14. doi:10.1186/s40780-019-0143-5

46. Alarcón T, Bárcena A, González-Montalvo JI, Penãlosa C, Salgado A. Factors predictive of outcome on admission to an acute geriatric ward. Age Ageing. 1999;28(5):429‐32. doi:10.1093/ageing/28.5.429

47. Unutmaz GD, Soysal P, Tuven B, Isik AT. Costs of medication in older patients: before and after comprehensive geriatric assessment. Clin Interv Aging. 2018;13:607‐13. doi:10.2147/CIA.S159966

48. Flaherty JH, Perry HM 3rd, Lynchard GS, Morley JE. Polypharmacy and hospitalization among older home care patients. J Gerontol a Biol Sci Med Sci. 2000;55(10):M554–M559. doi:10.1093/gerona/55.10.m554

49. Franchi C, Marcucci M, Mannucci PM, et al. Changes in clinical outcomes for community-dwelling older people exposed to incident chronic polypharmacy: a comparison between 2001 and 2009. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25(2):204–211. doi:10.1002/pds.3938

50. Alsuwaidan A, Almedlej N, Alsabti S, et al. A comprehensive overview of polypharmacy in elderly patients in Saudi Arabia. Geriatrics. 2019;4(2):36. doi:10.3390/geriatrics4020036

51. Zumla A, Hui DS, Perlman S. Middle East respiratory syndrome. Lancet. 2015;386(9997):995–1007. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60454-8

52. Chan-Yeung M, Xu RH. SARS: epidemiology. Respirology. 2003;8(Suppl):S9–S14. doi:10.1046/j.1440-1843.2003.00518.x

53. Wastesson JW, Morin L, Tan ECK, Johnell K. An update on the clinical consequences of polypharmacy in older adults: a narrative review. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018;17(12):1185–1196. doi:10.1080/14740338.2018.1546841

54. Mahase E. China coronavirus: what do we know so far? BMJ. 2020;368:m308. doi:10.1136/bmj.m308

55. Thompson WW, Shay DK, Weintraub E, et al. Mortality associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States. JAMA. 2003;289(2):179–186. doi:10.1001/jama.289.2.179

56. Wang D, Hu B, Hu C, et al. Clinical characteristics of 138 hospitalized patients with 2019 Novel Coronavirus-Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA. 2020:e201585. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.1585.

57. Wang W, Tang J, Wei F. Updated understanding of the outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in Wuhan, China. J Med Virol. 2020;92(4):441–447. doi:10.1002/jmv.25689

58. Aron J, Muellbauer J A pandemic primer on excess mortality statistics and their comparability across countries. Our World in Data; 2020. Available from https://ourworldindata.org/covid-excess-mortality. [Accessed July 11, 2020.]

59. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Daily Data Summary; 2020. Available from https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/doh/downloads/pdf/imm/covid-19-daily-data-summary-deaths-05132020-1.pdf. [Accessed July 11, 2020.]

60. World Health Organization. Global Health and Aging. Geneva: WHO; 2011. Available athttps://www.who.int/ageing/publications/global_health.pdf?ua=1. Accessed 21 June 2020.

61. Rich MW. Heart failure in the 21st century: a cardiogeriatric syndrome. J Gerontol a Biol Sci Med Sci. 2001;56(2):M88‐M96. doi:10.1093/gerona/56.2.m88

62. Boumendil A, Maury E, Reinhard I, Luquel L, Offenstadt G, Guidet B. Prognosis of patients aged 80 years and over admitted in medical intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2004;30(4):647‐54. doi:10.1007/s00134-003-2150-z

63. Chiatti C, Bustacchini S, Furneri G, et al. The economic burden of inappropriate drug prescribing, lack of adherence and compliance, adverse drug events in older people: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2012;35(Suppl 1):73–87. doi:10.1007/BF03319105

64. Back DJ, Marzolini C. The challenge of HIV treatment in an era of polypharmacy. J Int AIDS Soc. 2020;23:e25449. doi:10.1002/jia2.25449

65. Al Ameri MN, Makramalla E, Albur U, Kumar A, Rao P. Prevalence of polypharmacy in the elderly: implications of age, gender, co-morbidities, and drug interactions. SOJ Pharm Sci. 2014;1(3):1–7.

66. Fukuba N, Nishida M, Hayashi M, et al. The relationship between polypharmacy and hospital-stay duration: a retrospective study. Cureus. 2020;12(3):e7267. doi:10.7759/cureus.7267

67. Back D, Marzolini C, Hodge C, et al. COVID-19 treatment in patients with co-morbidities: awareness of drug-drug interactions. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020. doi:10.1111/bcp.14358

68. Hung IF, Zhang AJ, To KK, et al. Unexpectedly higher morbidity and mortality of hospitalized elderly patients associated with rhinovirus compared with influenza virus respiratory tract infection. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(2):259. doi:10.3390/ijms18020259

69. Falsey AR, Hennessey PA, Formica MA, Cox C, Walsh EE. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly and high-risk adults. N Engl J Med. 2005;352(17):1749‐59. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa043951

70. Elliot AJ, Fleming DM. Influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the elderly. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2008;7(2):249‐58. doi:10.1586/14760584.7.2.249

71. Clayville LR. Influenza update: a review of currently available vaccines. P T. 2011;36(10):659‐84.

72. Goel MK, Goel M, Khanna P, Mittal K. Pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009 vaccine: an update. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2011;29(1):13‐18. doi:10.4103/0255-0857.76517

73. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. People 65 years and older & influenzas. National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases (NCIRD); 2019. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/flu/highrisk/65over.htm. (Accessed May 15, 2020.)

74. Haber N, Khelili D, Martineau D, Dekimeche S, Szekely C, Lebon P. Delay in diagnosis of influenza virus in an elderly hospitalized patient: a fatal outcome. Clin Med Insights Case Rep. 2012;5:5‐8. doi:10.4137/CCRep.S8460

75. Régis C, Voirin N, Escuret V, et al. Five years of hospital-based surveillance of influenza-like illness and influenza in a short-stay geriatric unit. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:99. doi:10.1186/1756-0500-7-99

76. Ison MG. Influenza in hospitalized adults: gaining insight into a significant problem. J Infect Dis. 2009;200(4):485‐88. doi:10.1086/600384

77. van den Dool C, Hak E, Wallinga J, van Loon AM, Lammers JW, Bonten MJ. Symptoms of influenza virus infection in hospitalized patients. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2008;29(4):314‐19. doi:10.1086/529211

78. Fried TR, Vaz Fragoso CA, Rabow MW. Caring for the older person with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. JAMA. 2012;308(12):1254‐63. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.12422

79. Wilhelm M. Influenza in older patients: a call to action and recent updates for vaccinations. Am J Manag Care. 2018;24(2 Suppl):S15‐S24.

80. Brundage JF, Shanks GD. Deaths from bacterial pneumonia during 191819 influenza pandemic. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14(8):1193‐99. doi:10.3201/eid1408.071313

81. Shanks GD, Mackenzie A, McLaughlin R, et al. Mortality risk factors during the 191819 influenza pandemic in the Australian army. J Infect Dis. 2010;201(12):1880‐9. doi:10.1086/652868

82. Zhou H, Thompson WW, Viboud CG, et al. Hospitalizations associated with influenza and respiratory syncytial virus in the United States, 19932008. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(10):1427‐36. doi:10.1093/cid/cis211

83. Palekar RS, Rolfes MA, Arriola CS, et al. Burden of influenza-associated respiratory hospitalizations in the Americas, 20102015. PLoS One. 2019;14(9):e0221479. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221479

84. Amawi H, Abu Deiab GI, An Aljabali AA. COVID-19 pandemic: an overview of epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostics, and potential vaccines and therapeutics.. Ther Deliv. 2020;11((4)):245‐68. doi:10.4155

85. Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), people who are at higher risk: older Adults. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/need-extra-precautions/older-adults.html. (Accessed June 21, 2020.)

86. Bonanad C, García-Blas S, Tarazona-Santabalbina FJ, et al. Coronavirus: la emergencia geriátrica de 2020. Documento conjunto de la sección de cardiología geriátrica de la sociedad española de cardiología y la sociedad española de geriatría y gerontología [coronavirus: the geriatric emergency of 2020. Joint document of the geriatric cardiology section of the spanish society of cardiology and the spanish society of geriatrics and gerontology]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2020. doi:10.1016/j.recesp.2020.03.027

87. Li W, Ding C, Yin S. Severe pneumonia in the elderly: a multivariate analysis of risk factors. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015;8(8):12463‐75.

88. Simonetti AF, Viasus D, Garcia-Vidal C, Carratalà J. Management of community-acquired pneumonia in older adults. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2014;2(1):3‐16. doi:10.1177/2049936113518041

89. World Health Organization. Regional office for the western pacific. Calibrating long-term non-pharmaceutical interventions for COVID-19: principles and facilitation tools. Manila: WHO. Regional Office for the Western Pacific; (‎2020)‎. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332099. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. (Accessed June 21, 2020.)

90. Hamid S, Mir MY, Rohela GK. Novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19): a pandemic (epidemiology, pathogenesis, and potential therapeutics). New Microbes New Infect. 2020;35:100679. doi:10.1016/j.nmni.2020.100679

91. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Statement- Older people are at higher risk from COVID-19, but all must act to prevent community spread; 2020. Avaialablr from:. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/statements/statement-older-people-are-at-highest-risk-from-covid-19,-but-all-must-act-to-prevent-community-spread.

92. Fischer F, Raiber L, Boscher C, Winter MH. COVID-19 and the elderly: who cares? Front Public Health. 2020;8:151. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2020.00151

93. Koff WC, Williams MA. Covid-19 and immunity in aging populations - a new research agenda. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:804–805. doi:10.1056/NEJMp2006761

94. Guan WJ, Liang WH, Zhao Y, et al. Comorbidity and its impact on 1590 patients with COVID-19 in China: a nationwide analysis. Eur Respir J. 2020;55(5):2000547. doi:10.1183/13993003.00547-2020

95. Li X, Ma X. Acute respiratory failure in COVID-19: is it “typical” ARDS? Crit Care. 2020;24(198). doi:10.1186/s13054-020-02911-9

96. Ruan Q, Yang K, Wang W, Jiang L, Song J. Clinical predictors of mortality due to COVID-19 based on an analysis of data of 150 patients from Wuhan, China. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(5):846‐8. doi:10.1007/s00134-020-05991-x

97. Singhal TA. Review of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Indian J Pediatr. 2020;87(4):281‐6. doi:10.1007/s12098-020-03263-6

98. Greenland JR, Michelow MD, Wang L, London MJ. COVID-19 Infection: implications for perioperative and critical care physicians. Anesthesiology. 2020;132(6):1346‐61. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000003303

99. Iyengar K, Bahl S, Vaishya R, Vaish A. Challenges and solutions in meeting up the urgent requirement of ventilators for COVID-19 patients. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2020;14(4):499–501. doi:10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.048.

100. Mora Carpio AL, Mora JI Ventilator Management. [Updated 2020 Mar 28.]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020 Jan. Available at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK448186. [Accessed May 15, 2020.]

101. Langer T, Santini A, Bottino N, et al. “Awake” extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO): pathophysiology, technical considerations, and clinical pioneering. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):150. doi:10.1186/s13054-016-1329-y

102. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, et al. Presenting characteristics, co-morbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the New York City Area. JAMA. 2020;323(20):2052–2059. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.6775

103. Mert E, Arzu T, Balam YB, Murat A. Infections in the elderly critically ill patients. Frontiers Medicine. 2019;6:118. doi:10.3389/fmed.2019.00118

104. World Health Organization. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) when COVID-19 disease is suspected. Interim Guidance; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/clinical-management-of-novel-cov.pdf. (Accessed June 21, 2020.)

105. Zaim S, Chong JH, Sankaranarayanan V, Harky A. COVID-19, and multi-organ response. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2020;45:100618. doi:10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2020.100618

106. Cao X. COVID-19: immunopathology and its implications for therapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(5):269‐70. doi:10.1038/s41577-020-0308-3

107. Corona Tracker Community Research Group. Corona tracker: worldwide COVID-19 outbreak data analysis and prediction. WHO; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/bulletin/online_first/20-255695.pdf. (Accessed May 15, 2020.)

108. Zhou F, Yu T, Du R, et al. Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1054‐62. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30566-3

109. Guan WJ, Ni ZY, Hu Y, et al. Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(18):1708‐20. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2002032

110. Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, et al.; ARDS Definition Task Force. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–2533. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.5669.

111. Sommerstein R. Preventing a COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ. 2020;368:m810.

112. Fang L, Karakiulakis G, Roth M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:e21. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30116-8

113. Yang J, Zheng Y, Gou X, et al. Prevalence of co-morbidities in the novel Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;94:91–95. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.01

114. Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcome of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(16):1674–1681. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.5394

115. Garg S, Kim L, Whitaker M, et al. Hospitalization rates and characteristics of patients hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 – COVID-NET, 14 States, March 1–30. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(15):458–464. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6915e3

116. Wan Y, Shang J, Graham R, Baric RS, Li F. Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS Coronavirus. J Virol. 2020;94(7):e00127–20. doi:10.1128/JVI.00127-20

117. Cell Editorial Team. Embracing the Landscape of Therapeutics. Cell. 2020 Apr 2;181(1):1-3. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.025

118. De Abajo FJ, Rodríguez-Martín S, Lerma V, et al. Use of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and risk of COVID-19 requiring admission to hospital: a case-population study. Lancet. 2020;395(10238):1705‐14. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31030-8

119. Schiffrin EL, Flack JM, Ito S, Muntner P, Webb RC. Hypertension and COVID-19. Am J Hypertens. 2020;33(5):373‐4. doi:10.1093/ajh/hpaa057

120. Shah BR, Hux JE. Quantifying the risk of infectious diseases for people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(2):510–513. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.2.510

121. Muller LM, Gorter KJ, Hak E, et al. Increased risk of common infections in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Infect Dis. 2005;41(3):281–288. doi:10.1086/431587

122. Yang JK, Feng Y, Yuan MY. Plasma glucose levels and diabetes are independent predictors for mortality and morbidity in patients with SARS. Diabet Med. 2006;23(6):623–628. doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01861.x

123. Alqahtani FY, Aleanizy FS, Ali El Hadi Mohamed R, et al. Prevalence of co-morbidities in cases of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a retrospective study. Epidemiol Infect. 2018;147::1–5. doi:10.1017/S0950268818002923

124. Cariou B, Hadjadj S, Wargny M, et al. Phenotypic characteristics and prognosis of inpatients with COVID-19 and diabetes: the CORONADO study. Diabetologia. 2020:1‐16. doi:10.1007/s00125-020-05180-x.

125. Jung YJ, Yoon JL, Kim HS, Lee AY, Kim MY, Cho JJ. Atypical clinical presentation of geriatric syndrome in elderly patients with pneumonia or coronary artery disease. Ann of Geri Med and Res. 2017;21(4):158–163. doi:10.4235/agmr.2017.21.4.158

126. D’Adamo H, Yoshikawa T, Ouslander JG. Coronavirus disease 2019 in geriatrics and long-term care: the ABCDs of COVID-19. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(5):912–917. doi:10.1111/jgs.16445

127. Holroyd-Leduc J, Gandell D, Alana Miller A, Dmitriy Petrov D. COVID-19 in Older Adults. University of Toronto; 2020. Available from https://www.rgptoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/COVID-19-Presentations-in-Frail-Older-Adults-U-of-C-and-U-fo-T.pdf. (Accessed July 19, 2020.)

128. Malone ML, Hogan TM, Perry A, et al. COVID-19 in older adults: key points for emergency department providers. J Geri Emerg Med. 2020;1(4):1–11.

129. Greenhalgh T, Koh GCH, Car J. Covid-19: a remote assessment in primary care. BMJ. 2020;368:m1182. doi:10.1136/bmj.m1182

130. World Health Organization. Strengthening the health system response to covid-19 preventing and managing the Covid-19 pandemic across long-term care services in the WHO. European Region; 2020. Available from https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/333067/WHO-EURO-2020-804-40539-54460-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. (Accessed July 19, 2020.)

131. Mair A, Fernandez-Llimos F, Alonso A, et al. The sympathy consortium. Polypharmacy management by 2030: a patient safety challenge. Coimbra: SYMPATHY Consortium. 2017.

132. Mlodinow SG, Linn BS, Mahvan T, Ramer LN, Ngaima NM. Strategies to reduce and prevent polypharmacy in older patients. J Fam Pract. 2019;68(8):429‐40.

133. Dwyer LL, Han B, Woodwell DA, Rechtsteiner EA. Polypharmacy in nursing home residents in the United States: results of the 2004 national nursing home survey. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2010;8(1):63‐72. doi:10.1016/j.amjopharm.2010.01.001

134. Cooper JA, Cadogan CA, Patterson SM, et al. Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy in older people: a Cochrane systematic review. BMJ Open. 2015;5(12):e009235. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009235

135. World Health Organization. Regional strategy for patient-safety in the WHO South-East Asia Region; (2016–2025). Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/205839/B5215.pdf?sequence=1. (Accessed June 21, 2020.)

136. World Health Organization. Medication safety in polypharmacy. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/325454/WHO-UHC-SDS-2019.11-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. (Accessed June 21, 2020.)

137. World Health Organization (WHO). Medication Without Harm - Global Patient Safety Challenge on Medication Safety. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017.

138. Yang J, Liao Y, Lin W-B, et al. Prescribing errors in electronic prescriptions for outpatients intercepted by pharmacists and the impact of prescribing workload on error rate in a Chinese tertiary-care women and children’s hospital. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019;19:1013. doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4843-1

139. Avery A, Barber N, Ghaleb M, et al. Investigating the prevalence and causes of prescribing errors in general practice: the PRACtICe study. London: General Medical Council. 2012;227p.

140. Sears K, Scobie A, Mackinnon NJ. Patient-related risk factors for self-reported medication errors in hospital and community settings in 8 countries. Can Pharm J. 2012;145(2):88–93. doi:10.3821/145.2.cpj88

141. Sabzwari SR, Qidwai W, Bhanji S. Polypharmacy in elderly: a cautious trail to tread. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013;63(5):624‐27.

142. Arnoldo L, Cattani G, Cojutti P, Pea F, Brusaferro S. Monitoring polypharmacy in healthcare systems through a multi-setting survey: should we put more attention on long term care facilities? J Public Health Res. 2016;5(3):745. doi:10.4081/jphr.2016.745

143. Duncan P, Duerden M, Payne RA. Deprescribing: a primary care perspective. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017;24(1):37–42. doi:10.1136/ejhpharm-2016-000967

144. Ross SB, Wilson MG, Papillon‐Ferland L, et al. COVID-SAFER deprescribing guidance for hydroxychloroquine drug interactions in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68:1636–1646. doi:10.1111/jgs.1662.;.

145. Prybys KM, Melville KA, Hanna JR Polypharmacy in the elderly: clinical challenges in emergency practice. Part i: overview, etiology, and drug interactions. Available from: https://www.reliasmedia.com/articles/119992-polypharmacy-in-the-elderly-clinical-challenges-in-emergency-practice-part-i. (Accessed June 21, 2020).

146. McDonald VM, Simpson JL, Higgins I, Gibson PG. Multidimensional assessment of older people with asthma and COPD: clinical management and health status. Age Ageing. 2011;40(1):42‐9. doi:10.1093/ageing/afq134

147. World Health Organization. Clinical management of severe acute respiratory infection (SARI) when COVID-19 disease is suspected. Interim guidance; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/clinical-management-of-novel-cov.pdf. (Accessed June 21, 2020.)

148. Smith PF, Dodds M, Bentley D, Yeo K. Dosing will be a key success factor in repurposing antivirals for COVID-19. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2020. doi:10.1111/bcp.14314

149. Reeve E, Moriarty F, Nahas R, Turner JP, O’Donnell LK, Hilmer SN. A narrative review of the safety concerns of deprescribing in older adults and strategies to mitigate potential harms. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2018;17(1):39–49. doi:10.1080/14740338.2018.1397625

150. Vande Griend JP Common Polypharmacy Pitfalls. Pharmacy Times; 2009. Available from: https://www.pharmacytimes.com/publications/issue/2009/2009-01/2009-01-9968. (Accessed May 16, 2020).

151. Sarwar MR, Iftikhar S, Sarfraz M. Influence of education level of older patients on polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications listed in beer’s criteria, and unplanned hospitalization: a cross-sectional study in Lahore, Pakistan. Medicina. 2018;54(4):57. doi:10.3390/medicina54040057

152. Woodward M. Deprescribing: achieving better health outcomes for older people through reducing medications. J Pharm Pract Res. 2003;33:323–328. doi:10.1002/jppr2003334323

153. Reeve E, Gnjidic D, Long J, Hilmer S. A systematic review of the emerging definition of ‘deprescribing’ with network analysis: implications for future research and clinical practice. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80(6):1254–1268. doi:10.1111/bcp.12732

154. Budnitz DS, Lovegrove MC, Shehab N, Richards CL. Emergency hospitalizations for adverse drug events in older Americans. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(21):2002–2012. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa1103053

155. Bennett A, Gnjidic D, Gillett M, et al. Prevalence and impact of fall-risk-increasing drugs, polypharmacy, and drug-drug interactions in robust versus frail hospitalised falls patients: a prospective cohort study. Drugs Aging. 2014;31(3):225–232. doi:10.1007/s40266-013-0151-3

156. Zechmann S, Trueb C, Valeri F, Streit S, Senn O, Neuner-Jehle S. Barriers and enablers for deprescribing among older, multimorbid patients with polypharmacy: an explorative study from Switzerland. BMC Fam Pract. 2019;20(1):64. doi:10.1186/s12875-019-0953-4

157. Lavan AH, Gallagher P. Predicting risk of adverse drug reactions in older adults. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2016;7(1):11–22. doi:10.1177/2042098615615472

158. Stevenson JM, Williams JL, Burnham TG, et al. Predicting adverse drug reactions in older adults; a systematic review of the risk prediction models. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:1581–1593. doi:10.2147/CIA.S65475

159. Thompson W, Lundby C, Graabaek T, et al. Tools for deprescribing in frail older persons and those with limited life expectancy: a systematic review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(1):172–180. doi:10.1111/jgs.15616

160. American geriatrics society 2012 beers criteria update expert panel. American geriatrics society updated beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2012;60(4):616–631. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2012.03923.x

161. Gallagher P, Ryan C, Byrne S, Kennedy J, O’Mahony D. STOPP (screening tool of older person’s prescriptions) and start (screening tool to alert doctors to right treatment). Consensus validation. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008;46(2):72–83. doi:10.5414/cpp46072

162. Naugler CT, Brymer C, Stolee P, Arcese ZA. Development and validation of an improving prescribing in the elderly tool. Can J Clin Pharmacol. 2000;7(2):103–107.

163. McLeod PJ, Huang AR, Tamblyn RM, Gayton DC. Defining inappropriate practices in prescribing for elderly people: a national consensus panel. CMAJ. 1997;156(3):385–391.

164. Hanlon JT, Schmader KE, Samsa GP, et al. A method for assessing drug therapy appropriateness. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(10):1045–1051. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90144-c

165. Wehling M. Multimorbidity and polypharmacy: how to reduce the harmful drug load and yet add needed drugs in the elderly? Proposal of a new drug classification: fit for the aged. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57(3):560–561. doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2009.02131.x

166. Holt S, Schmiedl S, Thürmann PA. Potentially inappropriate medications in the elderly: the PRISCUS list. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(3132):543–551. doi:10.3238/arztebl.2010.0543

167. Patterson SM, Cadogan CA, Kerse N, et al. Interventions to improve the appropriate use of polypharmacy for older people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;10:CD008165. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD008165.pub3

168. Hilmer SN, Mager DE, Simonsick EM, et al. A drug burden index to define the functional burden of medications in older people. Arch Intern Med. 2007;167(8):781–787. doi:10.1001/archinte.167.8.781

169. Rudolph JL, Salow MJ, Angelini MC, McGlinchey RE. The anticholinergic risk scale and anticholinergic adverse effects in older persons. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(5):508–513. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2007.106

170. Lowry E, Woodman RJ, Soiza RL, Mangoni AA. Associations between the anticholinergic risk scale score and physical function: potential implications for adverse outcomes in older hospitalized patients. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2011;12(8):565–572. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2011.03.006

171. Lowry E, Woodman RJ, Soiza RL, Hilmer SN, Mangoni AA. Drug burden index, physical function, and adverse outcomes in older hospitalized patients. J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;52(10):1584–1591. doi:10.1177/0091270011421489

172. Scott I, Anderson K, Freeman C. Review of structured guides for deprescribing. Eur J Hosp Pharm. 2017;24(1):51–57. doi:10.1136/ejhpharm-2015-000864

173. Onder G, Petrovic M, Tangiisuran B, et al. Development and validation of a score to assess risk of adverse drug reactions among in-hospital patients 65 years or older: the GerontoNet ADR risk score. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(13):1142–1148. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2010.153

174. Saedder EA, Lisby M, Nielsen LP, et al. Detection of patients at high risk of medication errors: development and validation of an algorithm. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2016;118(2):143–149. doi:10.1111/bcpt.12473

175. Urbina O, Ferrández O, Grau S, et al. Design of a score to identify hospitalized patients at risk of drug-related problems. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2014;23(9):923–932. doi:10.1002/pds.3634

176. Sakuma M, Bates DW, Morimoto T. Clinical prediction rule to identify high-risk inpatients for adverse drug events: the JADE Study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2012;21(11):1221–1226. doi:10.1002/pds.3331

177. Cook CE. Potential pitfalls of clinical prediction rules. J Man Manip Ther. 2008;16(2):69–71. doi:10.1179/106698108790818477

178. Iyer S, Goss E, Browder C, Paccione G, Arnsten J. Development and evaluation of a clinical reasoning curriculum as part of an internal medicine residency program. Diagnosis. 2019;6(2):115–119. doi:10.1515/dx-2018-0093

179. McGinn T, Jervis R, Wisnivesky J, Keitz S, Wyer PC. Evidence-based Medicine Teaching Tips Working Group. Tips for teachers of evidence-based medicine: clinical prediction rules (CPRs) and estimating pretest probability. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(8):1261–1268. doi:10.1007/s11606-008-0623-z

180. Lindsay J, Dooley M, Martin J, et al. The development and evaluation of an oncological palliative care deprescribing guideline: the ‘OncPal deprescribing guideline’. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(1):71–78. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2322-0

181. Reeve E, Gnjidic D, Hilmer S. The role of the OncPal deprescribing guideline in end-of-life care. Support Care Cancer. 2015;23(4):899. doi:10.1007/s00520-014-2445-3

182. Bjerre LM, Farrell B, Hogel M, et al. Deprescribing antipsychotics for behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia and insomnia: evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Can Fam Physician. 2018;64(1):17–27.

183. Thillainadesan J, Gnjidic D, Green S, Hilmer SN. Impact of deprescribing interventions in older hospitalised patients on prescribing and clinical outcomes: a systematic review of randomised trials. Drugs Aging. 2018;35(4):303–319. doi:10.1007/s40266-018-0536-4

184. Payne RA, Avery AJ. Polypharmacy: one of the greatest prescribing challenges in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(583):83–84. doi:10.3399/bjgp11X556146

185. Khezrian M, McNeil CJ, Murray AD, Myint PK. An overview of prevalence, determinants and health outcomes of polypharmacy. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2020;11:2042098620933741. doi:10.1177/2042098620933741

186. World Health Organization. Medication safety in polypharmacy. Technical Report; 2019. (WHO/UHC/SDS/2019.11). License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1235792/retrieve. (Accessed May 16, 2020.)

187. Cadogan CA, Ryan C, Hughes CM. Appropriate polypharmacy and medicine safety: when many is not too many. Drug Safety. 2016;39(2):109–116. doi:10.1007/s40264-015-0378-5

188. Rochon PA Drug prescribing for older adults. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/drug-prescribing-for-older-adults. (Accessed June 21, 2020.)

189. Wilfling D, Hinz A, Steinhäuser J. Big data analysis techniques to address polypharmacy in patients - a scoping review. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):180. doi:10.1186/s12875-020-01247-1

190. Ailabouni NJ, Hilmer SN, Kalisch L, Braund R, Reeve E. COVID-19 pandemic: considerations for safe medication use in older adults with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. J Gerontol. doi:10.1093/gerona/glaa104

191. SYMPATHY project: innovation for appropriate polypharmacy in the elderly. In: Digital Single Market [Website]. Brussels: European Commission. 2016. Available at: (https://ec.europa.eu/digital-singlemarket/en/news/simpathy-project-innovationappropriate-polypharmacy-elderly.) (accessed 21 June 2020.)

192. Wilson M, Mair A, Dreischulte T, Witham M. Prescribing to fit the needs of older people: the NHS Scotland Polypharmacy Guidance, 2nd edition. J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015;45(2):108–113. doi:10.4997/JRCPE.2015.204

193. World Health Organization. Advice on the use of masks in the community, during home care and in health care settings in the context of the novel coronavirus (2019‐nCoV) outbreak: Interim Guidance; 2020. Available from: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/documents/advice-on-the-use-of-masks-2019-ncov.pdf. (Accessed June 21, 2020.)

194. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2019‐nCoV: prevention & Treatment; 2020. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/about/prevention-treatment.html. (Accessed June 21, 2020.)

195. Haque M, Islam T, Rahman NAA, McKimm J, Abdullah A, Dhingra S. Strengthening Primary Health-Care Services to Help Prevent and Control Long-Term (Chronic) Non-Communicable Diseases in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2020;13:409-426. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S239074

196. Lim WH, Wong WM. COVID-19: notes from the front line, singapore’s primary health care perspective. Ann Fam Med. 2020;18(3):259–261. doi:10.1370/afm.2539

197. Lee VJ, Chiew CJ, Khong WX. Interrupting transmission of COVID-19: lessons from containment efforts in Singapore. J Travel Med. 2020;27(3):taaa039. doi:10.1093/jtm/taaa039

198. Paudel S, Dangal G, Chalise A, Bhandari TR, Dangal O. The coronavirus pandemic: what does the evidence show? J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2020;18(1):1–9. doi:10.33314/jnhrc.v18i1.2596

199. Qian X, Ren R, Wang Y, et al. Fighting against the common enemy of COVID-19: a practice of building a community with a shared future for mankind. Infect Dis Poverty. 2020;9(1):34. doi:10.1186/s40249-020-00650-1

200. Chang BB, Chiu TY. Ready for a long fight against the COVID-19 outbreak: an innovative model of tiered primary health care in Taiwan. BJGP Open. 2020;4(2):bjgpopen20X101068. doi:10.3399/bjgpopen20X101068

201. Lin C, Braund WE, Auerbach J, et al. Policy decisions and use of information technology to fight COVID-19, Taiwan. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(7):1506–1512. doi:10.3201/eid2607.200574

202. Kumar P. How to strengthen primary health care. J Family Med Prim Care. 2016;5(3):543–546. doi:10.4103/2249-4863.197263

203. Watkins DA, Jamison DT, Mills T, et al. Universal health coverage and essential packages of care. In: Disease Control Priorities: Improving Health and Reducing Poverty. Jamison DT, Gelband H, Horton S, et al., eds. 3rd ed. Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank; 2017.

204. Haque M. Combating covid-19: a coordinated efforts of healthcare providers and policy makers with global participation are needed to achieve the desired goals. Bang J Med Sci. 2020;19(Special Issue on Covid19):01–05.

205. Haque M. The COVID-19 pandemic - a global public health crisis: a brief overview regarding pharmacological interventions. Pesquisa Brasileira Em Odontopediatria e Clínica Integrada. 2020;20(\(Supp1)):e0146. doi:10.1590/pboci.2020.137

206. Thomas SL, Wakerman J, Humphreys JS. What core primary health care services should be available to Australians living in rural and remote communities? BMC Fam Pract. 2014;15:143. doi:10.1186/1471-2296-15-143

207. Lyle D, Saurman E, Kirby S, Jones D, Humphreys J, Wakerman J. What do evaluations tell us about implementing new models in rural and remote primary health care? Findings from a narrative analysis of seven service evaluations conducted by an Australian Centre of Research Excellence. Rural Remote Health. 2017;17(3):3926. doi:10.22605/RRH329

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]