The cost utility and budget impact of adjuvant racecadotril for acute diarrhea in children in Thailand
Authors Rautenberg TA, Zerwes U
Received 2 May 2017
Accepted for publication 14 June 2017
Published 17 July 2017 Volume 2017:9 Pages 411—422
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Akshita Wason
Peer reviewer comments 6
Editor who approved publication: Professor Giorgio Lorenzo Colombo
Tamlyn Anne Rautenberg,1,2 Ute Zerwes3
1IGES Institut, Berlin, Germany; 2Health Economics and HIV/AIDS Research Division (HEARD), School of Accounting, Economics and Finance, University of KwaZulu Natal, KwaZulu Natal, South Africa; 3Assessment in Medicine GmbH, Lörrach, Germany
Objective: To evaluate the cost utility and the budget impact of adjuvant racecadotril for the treatment of acute diarrhea in children in Thailand.
Methods: A cost utility model has been adapted to the context of Thailand to evaluate racecadotril plus oral rehydration solution (R+ORS) versus oral rehydration solution (ORS) alone for acute diarrhea in children <5 years old. The decision tree Excel model evaluates the costs and effects (quality-adjusted life years) over a 6-day time horizon from a public health care payer’s perspective in Thailand. Deterministic sensitivity analysis and budget impact analysis have been undertaken.
Results: According to the cost utility model, the intervention (R+ORS) is less costly and more effective than the comparator (ORS) for the base case with a dominant incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of −2,481,390฿ for the intervention. According to the budget impact analysis (assuming an increase of 5% market share for R+ORS over 5 years), the year-on-year reduction for diarrhea as a percentage of the total health care expenditure is −0.0027%, resulting in potential net cost savings of −35,632,482฿ over 5 years.
Conclusion: Subject to the assumptions and limitations of the models, adjuvant racecadotril versus ORS alone is potentially cost-effective for children in Thailand and uptake could translate into savings for the Thailand public health care system.
Keywords: economic evaluation, cost utility, decision analysis, health technology assessment
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]
Other articles by this author:
Methods to construct a step-by-step beginner’s guide to decision analytic cost-effectiveness modeling
Rautenberg T, Hulme C, Edlin R
Published Date: 11 October 2016
Evaluating the cost utility of racecadotril for the treatment of acute watery diarrhea in children: the RAWD model
Rautenberg TA, Zerwes U, Foerster D, Aultman R
Published Date: 20 April 2012