Technology Meets Tradition: CO2 Laser Circumcision versus Conventional Surgical Technique
Authors Ronchi P, Manno S, Dell'Atti L
Received 7 May 2020
Accepted for publication 24 June 2020
Published 16 July 2020 Volume 2020:12 Pages 255—260
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Jan Colli
Piero Ronchi,1 Stefano Manno,2 Lucio Dell’Atti1
1Department of Urology, University Hospital “Ospedali Riuniti”, Ancona, Italy; 2Urology Unit, Hospital “Pugliese Ciaccio”, Catanzaro, Italy
Correspondence: Lucio Dell’Atti
Department of Urology, University Hospital “Ospedali Riuniti”, 71 Conca Street, Ancona 60126, Italy
Tel +39 071 5966523
Fax +39 071 5963367
Purpose: We wished to present the clinical applications and to evaluate the benefits of the use of a carbon dioxide (CO2) laser versus the conventional procedure for circumcision in adults, in terms of duration of surgery, surgical techniques, complications, pain and cosmetic appearance.
Patients and Methods: The medical records of 482 patients who had been circumcised were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were divided into two groups: 168 patients (Group A) were circumcised with traditional techniques; and 314 patients (Group B) were circumcised using a CO2 laser. All the patients were circumcised under local anesthesia. Pain was evaluated using a verbal numerical rating scale for pain assessment. Postoperative wound swelling, bleeding, infection and pain were assessed at 4 hours, 24 hours and 7 days after surgery.
Results: There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of bleeding and infections. The difference in operating times between the groups was significant (p< 0.001). Wound disruptions occurred in one patient in Group A at 3 days and two patients in Group B at 1 week. Pain scores were low and there was less pain in Group B than in Group A during the first 4 hours (1.8 vs 3.7; p< 0.002). Compared with the conventional method, the CO2 laser technique was associated with much less pain at both 1 day (p< 0.002) and 7 days (p< 0.001) postoperatively. The cosmetic results were superior in Group B; a linear surgical scar developed in 94.9% of patients in Group B versus 61.3% in Group A (p< 0.001).
Conclusion: Our results show that the use of a CO2 laser was associated with a shorter operative time, less wound irritation and better cosmetic appearance compared with standard surgical techniques for circumcision.
Keywords: CO2 laser, circumcision, surgical technique, outcomes
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]