Teaching methods used by internal medicine residents on rounds: what works?
Authors Kulkarni VT, Salgado SM, Pelletier SR, Shields HM
Received 22 August 2018
Accepted for publication 23 December 2018
Published 21 January 2019 Volume 2019:10 Pages 15—21
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Andrew Yee
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Anwarul Azim Majumder
Vivek T Kulkarni,1 Sanjay M Salgado,2,3 Stephen R Pelletier,4 Helen M Shields3,5,6
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA; 2Hospitalist Service, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 4Office of Educational Quality Improvement, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; 5Division of Medical Communications, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA; 6Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endoscopy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
Background: The specific teaching methods used by internal medicine residents on walk rounds are unknown.
Objectives: 1) To characterize in real time the specific teaching methods used by internal medicine residents on rounds and 2) to identify attributes of successful resident teaching on rounds.
Materials and methods: We conducted a prospective mixed-methods study on inpatient medical services at a single academic medical center from September 2016 to January 2017. Participants were internal medicine residents (postgraduate year [PGY]-1, PGY-2, and PGY-3) and attending physicians. Teachers were PGY-2 and PGY-3 residents, and learners were PGY-1 residents. Residents’ teaching on rounds was observed and characterized according to resident demographics, specific teaching methods, and length of time. Participants completed a survey with Likert scale and free-text questions.
Results and conclusion: Among 136 surveys across 28 separate teaching encounters, we noted that PGY-3 residents’ teaching was rated significantly better than PGY-2 residents’ teaching. Teaching lasting >1 minute was rated significantly better than teaching lasting
Keywords: internal medicine, resident teaching, mixed methods, direct observation
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]