Back to Journals » Core Evidence » Volume 9

Targeted therapy in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors Clark O, Botrel T, Paladini L, Ferreira M

Received 30 July 2013

Accepted for publication 26 September 2013

Published 6 January 2014 Volume 2014:9 Pages 1—11


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 5

Otávio Clark,1 Tobias Engel Ayer Botrel,1 Luciano Paladini,1 Mariana Bhering Andrade Ferreira2

1Evidências Consulting, Campinas, Brazil; 2Roche do Brasil, São Paulo, Brazil

Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared the efficacy of targeted therapy to conventional chemotherapy (CT) in patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Methods: Several databases were searched, including Medline, Embase, LILACS, and CENTRAL. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). We performed a meta-analysis of the published data. The results are expressed as hazard ratio (HR) or risk ratio, with their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).
Results: The final analysis included twelve trials comprising 2,054 patients with TNBC, which compared conventional CT alone against CT combined with targeted therapy (bevacizumab [Bev], sorafenib [Sor], cetuximab, lapatinib, and iniparib). PFS was superior in previously untreated patients with TNBC who received Bev plus CT compared to CT alone (fixed effect, HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51–0.75; P<0.00001). Also, PFS was higher in one study that tested Bev plus CT combination in previously treated patients (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.33–0.74; P=0.0006). Sor plus CT was also tested as first-line and second-line treatments. The pooled data of PFS favored the combination CT plus Sor (fixed effect, HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49–0.98; P=0.04). Comparisons of iniparib plus CT also had a better PFS than CT alone (fixed effect, HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.62–0.90; P=0.002).
Conclusion: Targeted therapy, when associated with conventional CT, demonstrated gains in the PFS of patients with TNBC.

Keywords: triple-negative, chemotherapy, breast cancer, systematic review

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]