Sociodemographic differences in diabetic retinopathy screening; using patient-level primary care data for health equity audit
Simon DS Fraser1, GE Watkinson2, CA Rennie3, D King2, H Sanderson2, L Edwards4, P Roderick1
1Public Health Sciences and Medical Statistics, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, 2NHS Southampton City, Southampton, 3Southampton Eye Unit, Southampton General Hospital, Southampton, 4NHS Hampshire, Eastleigh, Hampshire, UK
Background: The prevalence of diabetes is increasing worldwide and there is inequality in the distribution of diabetic complications. Diabetic retinopathy is the leading cause of blindness in adults of working age in the UK, and certain risk factors are recognized. Retinopathy screening in the UK involves annual digital retinal photography and image grading. Auditing equity in retinopathy screening poses unique challenges, and screening program data are often incomplete for variables relevant to equity. Using two sources of patient-level primary care data, we conducted a health equity audit comparing the access and uptake of screening between groups of people with diabetes in each of three screening programs covering this area of southern England.
Methods: A patient-level dataset using data from general practices and a combined health record was used to compare dimensions of equity (gender, age, length of time since diabetes diagnosis, type of diabetes, presence of hypertension, socioeconomic deprivation, ethnicity, and screening program) between people with and without a record of retinopathy screening within three years in Hampshire and the Isle of Wight, UK.
Results: Anonymized data for 70,004 people with diabetes were obtained from 205 (88%) general practices. In total, 62,836 people (89.8%) had a record of screening within three years and 7168 (10.2%) did not. Lower uptake of screening was independently associated with the youngest and oldest age groups (compared with 50–79-year-olds), recent diabetes diagnosis, and deprived areas. Diagnosed hypertension was positively associated with screening.
Conclusion: Evaluating equity in screening programs is important to help reduce inequalities. We found evidence of inequity in access and uptake of retinopathy screening. Primary care data contained more information than screening program data. Using a combined health record was more efficient than obtaining data directly from general practices, but data were incomplete for deprivation measures at the time of this audit. Our audit informed subsequent efforts to improve equity in local diabetic retinopathy screening services.
Keywords: inequality, diabetes, eye, complications, screening
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF]
Other article by this author:
Fraser SD, George S
Published Date: 17 June 2015
Readers of this article also read:
Lin SC, Xu YC, Gan ZH, Han K, Hu HY, Yao Y, Huang MZ, Min DL
Published Date: 11 February 2016
Tunio MA, Al Asiri M, Al-Qahtani KH, Aldandan S, Riaz K, Bayoumi Y
Published Date: 25 June 2015
Qin J, Wu SG, Sun JY, Lin HX, He ZY, Li Q
Published Date: 23 April 2015
Samarium-153-ethylene diamine tetramethylene phosphonate, a beta-emitting bone-targeted radiopharmaceutical, useful for patients with osteoblastic bone metastases
Longo J, Lutz S, Johnstone C
Published Date: 13 August 2013
Brueseke TJ, Tewari KS
Published Date: 23 May 2013
Rosenberg AR, Wolfe J
Published Date: 24 March 2013
Cantrell MA, Ruble K
Published Date: 30 May 2011
Controversies on cosmetic outcomes in black women after breast conservation therapy: hyperperception or hyperpigmentation?
Sophia M Edwards-Bennett, Carol L Brown
Published Date: 15 March 2011
Gabriella Ferrandina, Giacomo Corrado, Angelo Licameli, et al
Published Date: 29 September 2010
Gena Kanas, Libby Morimoto, Fionna Mowat, et al
Published Date: 24 February 2010