Scenarios to Manage the Demand for N95 Respirators for Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Authors Sun Y, Otomaru H, Quaye SED, Somani J, Bagdasarian N, Beh DLL, Fisher DA, Cook AR, Dickens BL
Received 4 August 2020
Accepted for publication 24 September 2020
Published 5 November 2020 Volume 2020:13 Pages 2489—2496
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Professor Marco Carotenuto
Yinxiaohe Sun,1 Hirono Otomaru,1,2,* Sharon Esi Duoduwa Quaye,1 Jyoti Somani,3 Natasha Bagdasarian,3 Darius LL Beh,3 Dale A Fisher,3,4 Alex R Cook,1 Borame L Dickens1,*
1Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore; 2Department of Virology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; 3Division of Infectious Diseases, National University Hospital, Singapore; 4Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Correspondence: Hirono Otomaru Email [email protected]
Background: By estimating N95 respirator demand based on simulated epidemics, we aim to assist planning efforts requiring estimations of respirator demand for the healthcare system to continue operating safely in the coming months.
Methods: We assess respiratory needs over the course of mild, moderate and severe epidemic scenarios within Singapore as a case study using a transmission dynamic model. The number of respirators required within the respiratory isolation wards and intensive care units was estimated over the course of the epidemic. We also considered single-use, extended-use and prolonged-use strategies for N95 respirators for use by healthcare workers treating suspected but negative (misclassified) or confirmed COVID-19 patients.
Results: Depending on the confirmed to misclassified case ratio, from 1:0 to 1:10, a range of 117.1 million to 1.1 billion masks are required for single-use. This decreases to 71.6– 784.4 million for extended-use and 12.8– 148.2 million for prolonged-use, representing a 31.8– 38.9% and 86.5– 89.1% reduction, respectively.
Conclusion: An extended-use policy should be considered when short-term supply chains are strained but planning measures are in place to ensure long-term availability. With severe shortage expectations from a severe epidemic, as some European countries have experienced, prolonged use is necessary to prolong supply.
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic, mathematical modelling, policy, healthcare resources, N95 respirators
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]