Back to Journals » Patient Related Outcome Measures » Volume 9

Satisfied patients and pediatricians: a cross-sectional analysis

Authors Patel I, Chapman T, Camacho F, Shrestha S, Chang J, Balkrishnan R, Feldman SR

Received 5 January 2018

Accepted for publication 16 May 2018

Published 28 August 2018 Volume 2018:9 Pages 299—307

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S161621

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Ms Justinn Cochran

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Robert Howland


Isha Patel,1,* Travis Chapman,2,* Fabian Camacho,3 Shameen Shrestha,4 Jongwha Chang,5 Rajesh Balkrishnan,3 Steven R Feldman6

1Department of Pharmacy Practice, Administration and Research, Marshall University School of Pharmacy (MUSOP), Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA; 2Walgreens DBA Rite Aid, Winchester, VA, USA; 3Department of Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA; 4Bernard J Dunn School of Pharmacy, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, USA; 5Department of Pharmacy Practice and Clinical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA; 6Department of Dermatology, Pathology and Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Background: There is a lack of research in the USA comparing patient satisfaction with pediatricians and other primary care physicians (PCPs). We examined and compared patient satisfaction toward their pediatricians and PCPs and characterized factors associated with higher patient satisfaction in these two groups.
Methods: A random coefficient model with random slope and intercept was fit to the data, with patient satisfaction as a function of pediatrician/PCP, covariates, and physician random effects. Effect heterogeneity was assessed by allowing slope to vary as a function of covariates. Mediation analysis using the random coefficient model was conducted to calculate average total effect, average natural direct effect, and average indirect effect of pediatrician/PCP on satisfaction mediated by waiting/visit times.
Results: Pediatricians had higher predicted satisfaction ratings than PCPs (total effect = 4.8, 95% CI 3.7–5.9), with population-averaged mean of 82.2 (0.54) vs 77.4 (0.13). The direct effect was 3.9 (2.8–5.0) and the indirect effect was 0.9 (0.9–0.9), suggesting that part but not all of the total effect can be explained by pediatricians having decreased waiting/visit times leading to increased satisfaction. Predictions by subgroup suggested that pediatricians had lower ratings than PCPs for first visit, but higher ratings for all other covariate strata considered. Having longer waiting times and decreased visit times coincided with closer mean ratings between pediatricians and PCPs, other significant effect modifiers included patient sex, provider sex, and region of practice.
Conclusion: Pediatricians scored higher patient satisfaction ratings than the combined group of other PCPs. Pediatricians had shorter wait times to see their patients compared to PCPs. Shorter wait times and longer visit times were associated with higher patient satisfaction ratings.

Keywords: patient satisfaction, waiting time, office visits, surveys, questionnaires, humans

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]