Back to Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 4

Safety and efficacy of changing to the travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination (DuoTrav) from prior mono- or adjunctive therapy

Authors Pfeiffer N, Scherzer M, Maier H, Schoelzel S, Jasek MC, Stewart JA, Stewart W

Published 6 May 2010 Volume 2010:4 Pages 459—466

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S10694

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2


Norbert Pfeiffer1, Maria-Luise Scherzer2, Hubert Maier3, Sonja Schoelzel4, Mark C Jasek5, Jeanette A Stewart6, William C Stewart6 On behalf of the DuoTravMED study group

1Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz, Germany; 2Regenstauf, Germany; 3Gerolzhofen, Germany; 4Institutes of Molecular Medicine, University of Freiburg, Department of Surgery, Freiburg, Germany; 5Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Fort Worth, TX, USA; 6PRN Pharmaceutical Research Network, LLC, Charleston, SC, USA

Purpose: To assess the safety and efficacy of changing to the travoprost/timolol fixed combination (TTFC) from other mono- or adjunctive therapies.

Patients and methods: A prospective, open-label, observational cohort of primary open-angle glaucoma and ocular hypertensive patients whose intraocular pressure (IOP) was uncontrolled on prior therapy or was not on target. Patients were changed from prior mono- or adjunctive treatment at Day 0 to TTFC dosed every evening and underwent active treatment efficacy and safety evaluations at Week 12.

Results: In 474/522 (91%) patients who completed this trial an IOP (mm Hg) of 21.9 ± 2.0 on prior treatment was reduced by TTFC at Month 3: from all prior treatments 5.6 ± 2.6; from monotherapy 5.9 ± 2.3; from adjunctive treatments 4.5 ± 2.9; and from several of the most frequent individual treatments: timolol 5.7 ± 2.2; latanoprost 6.3 ± 2.6; and latanoprost/timolol fixed combination 4.4 ± 1.9. Ocular hyperemia was the most frequent adverse effect (n = 21, 4%). Both patients and physicians preferred TTFC compared to all prior and common individual treatments. The solicited symptom survey showed, following a modified Bonferroni correction (α/5), a reduced incidence with TTFC of ocular pain (P = 0.01) while the prior medicine had a lower incidence of burning on instillation (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Changing patients from prior mono- or adjunctive therapy to TTFC can provide on average a further reduction in IOP while demonstrating a favorable safety profile and a high patient preference.

Keywords: travoprost/timolol fixed combination, primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension, safety, efficacy, intraocular pressure

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]